Linking Moose Population and Plant Growth Models with a Moose Energetics Model

ABSTRACT Selective foraging by large mammals can change ecosystem properties such as plant species composition, nutrient cycling rates, and soil fertility. These changes, in turn, alter the availability of forage and could affect the relative efficiencies of foraging strategies used by these animals. We used a simulation model to predict how alternate foraging strategies affected the net annual energy balance of moose (Alces alces), moose density, and distribution of browse across the landscape. The model simulates the spatial distribution of vegetation in an 8-ha landscape of 1-m2 cells with seasonal changes in the energetic needs of free-ranging moose and plant phenology. The energetics model was integrated with a moose population model and a plant-growth model for long-term simulations. Changes in bite density in each feeding station are predicted with height and biomass logistic curves modified by a quadratic response to browsing. We tested foraging strategies using random, fractional, and marginal value theorem (MVT) algorithms on landscapes with a range of bite densities and differing spatial distributions. Small-scale disturbances (that is, tree-fall gaps) were required to maintain browse supply and prevent moose population extinction under all foraging strategies. Populations using a fractional stopping rule survived the 100-year simulations because moose browsed across much of the landscape and did not overbrowse patches with high bite density. Populations using random and MVT stopping rules became extinct in about 25 and about 50 years, respectively. Moose using a random stopping rule were in negative energy balance because travel time was high and the net energy intake rate was low on an annual basis. Moose using the MVT stopping rule were initially in positive energy balance, but as the high-density browse patches were overbrowsed and low-density unbrowsed patches grew out of reach, bite density decreased, and energy balance became negative in subsequent years. Thus, the foraging strategy used by individual moose resulted in creation of landscapes that strongly affected browse density, browse distribution, moose population density, and moose survival.

[1]  Peter B. Reich,et al.  Spatial Patterns and Succession in a Minnesota Southern‐Boreal Forest , 1995 .

[2]  P. Lundberg,et al.  Partial prey consumption by browsers: trees as patches , 1990 .

[3]  Mark A. White,et al.  SPATIAL PATTERNS IN THE MOOSE–FOREST–SOIL ECOSYSTEM ON ISLE ROYALE, MICHIGAN, USA , 1998 .

[4]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  A landscape simulation model of winter foraging by large ungulates , 1993 .

[5]  S. E. Aldous.  DEER BROWSE CLIPPING STUDY IN THE LAKE STATES REGION , 1952 .

[6]  Warren B. Ballard,et al.  Population dynamics of moose in South-central Alaska , 1991 .

[7]  P. Lundberg,et al.  An experimental test of frequency-dependent food selection: winter browsing by moose , 1990 .

[8]  R. Hudson,et al.  Seasonal foraging rates of free-ranging moose , 1986 .

[9]  W. Grant,et al.  Physiologically based landscape use model for large herbivores , 1992 .

[10]  O. Hjeljord,et al.  Moose and vegetation interactions in northwestern Europe and Poland , 1987 .

[11]  E. Reimers.  Reproduction in wild reindeer in Norway , 1983 .

[12]  A. T. Bergerud,et al.  Aerial Census of Moose in Central Newfoundland , 1969 .

[13]  Y. Cohen,et al.  Accuracy of GPS telemetry collar locations with differential correction , 1997 .

[14]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Methods to evaluate the performance of spatial simulation models , 1989 .

[15]  G. Pyke.  Optimal Foraging Theory: A Critical Review , 1984 .

[16]  Yosef Cohen,et al.  A SPATIALLY EXPLICIT MODEL OF MOOSE FORAGINGAND ENERGETICS , 1997 .

[17]  G. Cederlund,et al.  The development of the Swedish moose population, 1970-1983 , 1987 .

[18]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  Simulating Winter Interactions Among Ungulates, Vegetation, and Fire in Northern Yellowstone Park , 1994 .

[19]  R. D. Boertje,et al.  The role of predation in limiting moose at low densities in Alaska and Yukon and implications for conservation , 1992 .

[20]  J. Bédard,et al.  Short-term influence of moose upon woody plants of an early seral wintering site in Gaspé Peninsula, Quebec , 1978 .

[21]  R. Bergström,et al.  Effects of large mammalian browsers on architecture, biomass, and nutrients of woody plants , 1994 .

[22]  E. T. Thorne,et al.  Nutrition during Gestation in Relation to Successful Reproduction in Elk , 1976 .

[23]  R. Naiman,et al.  Effects of Moose Browsing on Vegetation and Litter of the Boreal Forest, Isle Royale, Michigan, USA , 1992 .

[24]  B. Saether,et al.  INTERACTIONS BETWEEN A GENERALIST HERBIVORE, THE MOOSE ALCES ALCES, AND ITS FOOD RESOURCES: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF WINTER FORAGING BEHAVIOUR IN RELATION TO BROWSE AVAILABILITY , 1987 .

[25]  M. Crête.  Approximation of K carrying capacity for moose in eastern Quebec , 1989 .

[26]  R. White.  Foraging patterns and their multiplier effects on productivity of northern ungulates , 1983 .

[27]  R. Bergström,et al.  Effects of Simulated Winter Browsing by Moose on Morphology and Biomass of Two Birch Species , 1987 .

[28]  Yosef Cohen,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneities, Carrying Capacity, and Feedbacks in Animal-Landscape Interactions , 1997 .

[29]  B. Mitchell,et al.  FERTILITY AND BODY WEIGHT IN FEMALE RED DEER: A DENSITY-DEPENDENT RELATIONSHIP , 1983 .

[30]  J. Roese,et al.  Habitat heterogeneity and foraging efficiency: an individual-based model , 1991 .

[31]  N. Hobbs.  Modification of Ecosystems by Ungulates , 1996 .

[32]  O. Loucks,et al.  WHITE-TAIL DEER (ODOCOILEUS VIRGINIANUS) INFLUENCE ON STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION OF TSUGA CANADENSIS FORESTS , 1979 .

[33]  F. Messier,et al.  UNGULATE POPULATION MODELS WITH PREDATION: A CASE STUDY WITH THE NORTH AMERICAN MOOSE' , 1994 .

[34]  D. DeAngelis,et al.  A model of herbivore feedback on plant productivity , 1986 .

[35]  A. Allen.  Habitat Suitability Index Models: Moose, Lake Superior Region. , 1987 .

[36]  F. Messier,et al.  THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LIMITING AND REGULATING FACTORS ON THE DEMOGRAPHY OF MOOSE AND WHITE-TAILED DEER , 1991 .

[37]  R. White,et al.  Calving success of female caribou in relation to body weight , 1993 .

[38]  John E. Gross,et al.  Functional Response of Herbivores in Food‐Concentrated Patches: Tests of a Mechanistic Model , 1993 .

[39]  J. R. Bray,et al.  Effects of long term deer exclusion on a Pinus resinosa forest in north central Minnesota. , 1970 .

[40]  G. Shaver,et al.  Vertebrate Herbivores and Northern Plant Communities: Reciprocal Influences and Responses , 1994 .

[41]  C. C. Schwartz,et al.  Reproductive characteristics of Alaskan moose , 1993 .

[42]  W. Ballard.  BEAR PREDATION ON MOOSE: A REVIEW OF RECENT NORTH AMERICAN STUDIES AND THEIR MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS , 2021 .

[43]  L. W. Krefting,et al.  Effect of Simulated and Natural Deer Browsing on Mountain Maple , 1966 .