The digital divide shifts to differences in usage

In a representative survey of the Dutch population we found that people with low levels of education and disabled people are using the Internet for more hours a day in their spare time than higher educated and employed populations. To explain this finding, we investigated what these people are doing online. The first contribution is a theoretically validated cluster of Internet usage types: information, news, personal development, social interaction, leisure, commercial transaction and gaming. The second contribution is that, based on this classification, we were able to identify a number of usage differences, including those demonstrated by people with different gender, age, education and Internet experience, that are often observed in digital divide literature. The general conclusion is that when the Internet matures, it will increasingly reflect known social, economic and cultural relationships of the offline world, including inequalities.

[1]  Ioana Boghian.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste , 2013 .

[2]  Veronika Kalmus,et al.  MOTIVES FOR INTERNET USE AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS WITH PERSONALITY TRAITS AND SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS , 2011 .

[3]  D. Hindman,et al.  Does the Digital Divide Matter More? Comparing the Effects of New Media and Old Media Use on the Education-Based Knowledge Gap , 2011 .

[4]  Petter Bae Brandtzæg,et al.  Towards a unified Media-User Typology (MUT): A meta-analysis and review of the research literature on media-user typologies , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  Jr. Leon Nolan,et al.  The Internet and Social Inequalities , 2010 .

[6]  Roderick Graham.  The Stylisation of Internet Life?: Predictors of Internet Leisure Patterns Using Digital Inequality and Status Group Perspectives , 2008 .

[7]  E. Hargittai,et al.  Digital Inequality , 2008, Commun. Res..

[8]  Sharon Meraz,et al.  Women, men and news: Divided and disconnected in the news media landscape , 2007 .

[9]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide , 2007, New Media Soc..

[10]  P. Valkenburg,et al.  Preadolescents' and adolescents' online communication and their closeness to friends. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[11]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[12]  José Manuel Ortega Egea,et al.  Diffusion and usage patterns of Internet services in the European Union , 2007, Inf. Res..

[13]  Ragnar Andreas Audunson,et al.  Technology and Social Inclusion. Rethinking the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Documentation.

[14]  Richard N. Landers,et al.  An investigation of Big Five and narrow personality traits in relation to Internet usage , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  N. Selwyn,et al.  Is It Only About Internet Access? An Empirical Test of a Multi-dimensional Digital Divide , 2006, EGOV.

[16]  I. Wasserman,et al.  Gender and the Internet: Causes of Variation in Access, Level, and Scope of Use , 2005 .

[17]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society , 2005 .

[18]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Internet Gratifications and Internet Addiction: On the Uses and Abuses of New Media , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[19]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide , 2004, New Media Soc..

[20]  Paul Shafer,et al.  From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use: A Literature Review and Agenda for Research on Digital Inequality , 2004 .

[21]  Wallace Koehler,et al.  Virtual inequality: Beyond the digital divide , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[22]  Frank Parry,et al.  Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction , 2003 .

[23]  John P. Robinson,et al.  NEW SOCIAL SURVEY PERSPECTIVES ON THE DIGITAL DIVIDE , 2003 .

[24]  Shana M. Mason,et al.  APPLYING COMMUNICATION THEORY TO DIGITAL DIVIDE RESEARCH , 2003 .

[25]  S. Tefft.  Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2002 .

[26]  James B. Hittner,et al.  Relationships among Internet use, personality, and social support , 2002, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Douglas Raber,et al.  The Digital Divide: Facing a Crisis or Creating a Myth , 2002 .

[28]  P. Howard,et al.  Days and Nights on the Internet , 2001 .

[29]  Jong-Kil Kim,et al.  Digital Divide: Conceptual Discussions and Prospect , 2001, Human.Society@Internet.

[30]  Paul DiMaggio,et al.  From the 'Digital Divide' to 'Digital Inequality': Studying Internet Use as Penetration Increases , 2001 .

[31]  Kelly S. Ervin,et al.  Gender and the Internet: Women Communicating and Men Searching , 2001 .

[32]  Phyllis Schumacher,et al.  Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Internet use in the contemporary media environment. , 2001 .

[34]  Elisheva F. Gross,et al.  The impact of computer use on children's and adolescents' development , 2001, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology.

[35]  Robert LaRose,et al.  Internet Self-Efficacy and the Psychology of the Digital Divide , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[36]  John D. Leckenby,et al.  Why We Need the Journal of Interactive Advertising , 2000 .

[37]  Blythe Suezann Harrell,et al.  Uses and gratifications of the internet , 2000 .

[38]  Y. Hamburger,et al.  The relationship between extraversion and neuroticism and the different uses of the Internet. , 2000 .

[39]  A. Rubin,et al.  Predictors of Internet Use , 2000 .

[40]  Peter Golding,et al.  World Wide Wedge: Division and Contradiction in the Global Information Infrastructure , 1996 .

[41]  J. Sterne.  World Wide Web marketing , 1995 .

[42]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[43]  Philip Palmgreen,et al.  GRATIFICATIONS SOUGHT AND MEDIA EXPOSURE An Expectancy Value Model , 1982 .

[44]  Ian T. Jolliffe,et al.  Discarding Variables in a Principal Component Analysis. I: Artificial Data , 1972 .

[45]  P. J. Tichenor,et al.  MASS MEDIA FLOW AND DIFFERENTIAL GROWTH IN KNOWLEDGE , 1970 .