AN INTRODUCTION TO INNOVATION ADOPTION THEORIES FOR THE DESIGN OF A PRODUCT FAMILY INFORMATION MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE

As new computer technologies emerge for the design and development of product platforms, applied theories of innovation diffusion and technology acceptance will become increasingly important for securing user cooperation with an information management system for product families. Incorporation of human factors therein will shorten the time required to reach return on investment and increase the depth and breath of information. The history of innovation adoption theories are explored and extended to include commercially available enterprise management software and the proposed product family infrastructure. Six practices, which can be included in the infrastructure in its experimental stages, are described for improving user likelihood of adoption. One efficient way to reuse design knowledge is by leveraging product platforms. Robertson and Ulrich define a product platform as “the collection of assets [i.e., components, processes, knowledge, people and relationships] that are shared by a set of products” [5]. They point out that “by sharing components and production processes across a platform of products, companies can develop differentiated products efficiently, increase the flexibility and responsiveness of their manufacturing processes, and take market share away from competitors that develop only one product at a time” [5]. An effective product platform strategy puts stress on engineers, though, to recognize and capitalize on those elements. It requires both hindsight to examine previously successful products and foresight to predict the shape and appeal of similar products in the future.

[1]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[2]  John Shine,et al.  Extending the New Technology Acceptance Model to Measure the End User Information Systems Satisfaction in a Mandatory Environment: A Bank's Treasury , 2003, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[3]  Steven B. Shooter,et al.  A Review of Software Solutions for the Management of New Product Development and Product Family Planning , 2005, DAC 2005.

[4]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[5]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  William Theodore Bolton,et al.  The perception and potential adoption of Channel 2000 : implications for diffusion theory and videotex technology / , 1981 .

[7]  Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah,et al.  An Empirical Investigation on End-Users' Acceptance of Enterprise Systems , 2004, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[8]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Product platform design and customization: Status and promise , 2004, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[9]  K. Ulrich,et al.  Planning for Product Platforms , 1998 .

[10]  Janis Terpenny,et al.  Toward an Information Management Infrastructure for Product Family Planning and Mass Customization , 2004, DAC 2004.

[11]  Chih-Hung Tsai,et al.  An empirical study on the correlation between the knowledge management method and new product development strategy on product performance in Taiwan’s industries , 2005 .

[12]  Dov Te'eni Determinants and Consequences of Perceived Complexity in Human-Computer Interaction* , 1989 .

[13]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[14]  Jean Thilmany Share the wealth , 2004 .

[15]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  INFORMATION CHANNEL DISPOSITION AND USE , 1987 .

[16]  Ronald E. Day,et al.  Clearing up implicit knowledge: Implications for Knowledge Management, information science, psychology, and social epistemology , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[18]  H. Khan Effectiveness of a Strategic Management Development Program , 2002 .

[19]  Mike Reynolds,et al.  The development of a theoretical framework and design tool for process usability assessment , 2003, Ergonomics.

[20]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[21]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[22]  Thomas Hill,et al.  Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. , 1987 .

[23]  Peter Caputi,et al.  Issues in predicting and explaining usage behaviors with the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior when usage is mandatory , 2000, ICIS.

[24]  H. Thomas Hurt,et al.  The systematic measurement of the perceived characteristics of information technologies I: Microcomputers as innovations , 1989 .

[25]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Exploring Semantic Web Technologies for Product Family Modeling , 2004 .

[26]  L. Beach,et al.  A Contingency Model for the Selection of Decision Strategies , 1978 .

[27]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[28]  Mark Keil,et al.  Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..