Mobile bearing knee kinematics change over time. A fluoroscopic study in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

BACKGROUND In a previous fluoroscopy study the motion of a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis was evaluated. That study showed that the axial rotation of the insert was limited. Three possible explanations are given for the limited rotation: low conformity between the femoral component and insert, the fixed anterior position of the insert-tibia pivot point leading to impingement and fibrous tissue formation. While the effect of the conformity on the axial rotation will not change over time, the effect of impingement and fibrous tissue is likely to increase, and thereby further decreasing the axial rotation. METHODS In order to accurately assess changes in axial rotation over time in a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis rheumatoid arthritis patient group, patients were evaluated 8 months and 3 years postoperatively using fluoroscopy. FINDINGS In comparison with the 8 months evaluation, the rotation of the femoral component (range: -10.8 degrees to 2.8 degrees) and the insert (range: -5.9 degrees to 1.4 degrees) were further limited at 3 years (respectively, -5.9 degrees to 4.9 degrees and -2.8 degrees to 5.4 degrees). Patterns of axial rotation for the femoral component and insert varied considerably between the trials within patients while at the 8 months evaluation no significant difference within patients was observed. INTERPRETATION This study shows the importance of re-evaluating knee kinematics over time. The axial rotation of both the femoral component as the insert decreased over time, indicating a kinematic change caused by intrinsic factors. The decline in rotation of the insert could be explained by increased impingement and the formation of fibrous tissue.

[1]  D A Dennis,et al.  In Vivo Anteroposterior Femorotibial Translation of Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Analysis , 1998, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  Brendan Joss,et al.  Mobile vs. fixed bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: A randomized study on short term clinical outcomes and knee kinematics. , 2006, The Knee.

[3]  M. Huo,et al.  Rotating platform knees: an emerging clinical standard: in the affirmative. , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  R. Scott,et al.  Total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. An overview. , 1999 .

[5]  F. C. Ewald The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  E. Valstar,et al.  Limited rotation of the mobile-bearing in a rotating platform total knee prosthesis. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[8]  Johan Bellemans,et al.  Knee Motions During Maximum Flexion in Fixed and Mobile-Bearing Arthroplasties , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  J. Stiehl,et al.  Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior-cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[10]  A. Geurts,et al.  Postural control in rheumatoid arthritis patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  A. Leardini,et al.  Dynamic in-vivo tibio-femoral and bearing motions in mobile bearing knee arthroplasty , 2004, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[12]  R. Malhotra,et al.  A comparison of fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 4.5 years. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  M. Andrade,et al.  Isokinetic evaluation of the knee in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 2002, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[14]  S. Giannini,et al.  Mobile and fixed bearing total knee prosthesis functional comparison during stair climbing. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[15]  S R Simon,et al.  Early changes in gait and maximum knee torque following knee arthroplasty. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  J. Stiehl,et al.  In vivo determination of condylar lift-off and screw-home in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. , 1999, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[17]  D A Dennis,et al.  Mobile-bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. , 2000, Instructional course lectures.

[18]  E R Valstar,et al.  A new model-based RSA method validated using CAD models and models from reversed engineering. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  T. Dalen,et al.  Mobile Bearings Do Not Improve Fixation in Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[20]  M. Sakauchi,et al.  Kinematic approach to gait analysis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis involving the knee joint. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[21]  M P Murray,et al.  Kinesiologic measurements of functional performance before and after geometric total knee replacemtn: one-year follow-up of twenty cases. , 1977, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[22]  Benjamin J. Fregly,et al.  Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar knee replacements , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[23]  Guoan Li,et al.  The Kinematics of Fixed- and Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[24]  J. Liau,et al.  Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Fixed or Mobile-bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2022 .

[25]  J. Perry,et al.  Valgus deformities of the feet and characteristics of gait in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. , 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  Jiann-Jong Liau,et al.  The influence of surgical malalignment on the contact pressures of fixed and mobile bearing knee prostheses--a biomechanical study. , 2003, Clinical biomechanics.

[27]  Mohamed R Mahfouz,et al.  Mobile-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty: Do the Polyethylene Bearings Rotate? , 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[28]  Bart L Kaptein,et al.  Marker Configuration Model-Based Roentgen Fluoroscopic Analysis. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  W. A. Hodge,et al.  Polyethylene Damage and Knee Kinematics After Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2001, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  E. PedroPabloAmenábar,et al.  Artroplastia total de rodilla en pacientes con artritis reumatoide , 2004 .

[31]  S. Banks,et al.  A kinematic comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing knee replacements. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[32]  E. Valstar,et al.  Increased muscle activity to stabilise mobile bearing knees in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 2005, The Knee.

[33]  Richard D Komistek,et al.  Kinematic comparison of posterior cruciate sacrifice versus substitution in a mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. , 2002, The Journal of arthroplasty.