Social exchange, social capital and information sharing in online environments: lessons from three case studies

This paper covers the themes of exchange theory, social exchange theory and social capital as related to information and knowledge sharing in online environments. It presents findings from three cases where individuals were encouraged to share information online in the expectation that this would lead to new knowledge creation. The work presented aligns with that of others who have recognized that social exchange theory may be deployed as an innovative means of analyzing economic and non-economic transactions between individuals and organizations (Bignoux, 2006, p. 619). The findings both inform, and raise questions, about motivating information sharing in online environments with reference to both the provision of incentives to participate, and the management of social capital. From the analysis of the three case studies it is concluded that the degree to which information may be exchanged in online environments relies more heavily on the extent to which actors are socially integrated with one another than it does on other factors such as investment in technical infrastructure, dedicated staffing or financial incentives for information sharing. Thus these findings indicate that those who hope to enhance information sharing practice online need to pay more attention to the means by which they make it possible for potential participants to build relationships of trust with one another, and less attention to the design of formal incentive structures.

[1]  Steven L. Blader,et al.  Identity and Cooperative Behavior in Groups , 2001 .

[2]  Chun-Ming Chang,et al.  Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  Anna-Karin Tötterman,et al.  Information behaviour meets social capital: a conceptual model , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[4]  Betsy Van der Veer Martens,et al.  The scholar's courtesy: The role of acknowledgement in the primary communication process , 1997 .

[5]  Gunilla Widén-Wulff The challenges of knowledge sharing in practice : a social approach , 2007 .

[6]  Jörgen Skågeby,et al.  Gifting technologies , 2004, First Monday.

[7]  Gunilla Widén,et al.  Explaining knowledge sharing in organizations through the dimensions of social capital , 2004, J. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Wei-Li Wu,et al.  Fostering the determinants of knowledge transfer: a team-level analysis , 2007, J. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Blaise Cronin,et al.  The Scholar's Courtesy: The Role Of Acknowledgement In The Primary Communication Process , 1995 .

[10]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[11]  Eric L. Lesser Chapter 1 – Leveraging Social Capital in Organizations , 2000 .

[12]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Borrowed theory: Applying exchange theories in information science research , 2003 .

[13]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing , 2002, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[14]  Eric L. Lesser Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications , 2000 .

[15]  Stephen A. Stumpf,et al.  SOCIAL CAPITAL IN THE SUCCESS OF KNOWLEDGE WORKERS , 2003 .

[16]  Nazareno Andrade,et al.  Gifting technologies: A BitTorrent case study , 2006, First Monday.

[17]  Hazel Hall Sharing capability: the development of a framework to investigate knowledge sharing in distributed organisations , 2022 .

[18]  Neil M. Bruce The Challenges of Knowledge Sharing in Practice: A Social Approach , 2008 .

[19]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly , 2009 .

[20]  Stephane Bignoux,et al.  Short‐term strategic alliances: a social exchange perspective , 2006 .