How to solve quality problems by advanced fully-automated manufacturing systems

Companies devoted to manufacture operations of small sets for the automotive industry need to follow the usual quality standards, accomplishing with the delivery times. Commonly, these operations are performed with automatic or semi-automatic equipment in order to increase their competitiveness. Some partially automated systems allow complex manufacturing operations but cannot always ensure the required level of quality. This work was developed in order to solve quality problems reported on the transmission system of automotive windshield wipers, where a brass’s tube is inserted and partially deformed at one of the tips. However, tubes’ suppliers cannot ensure the dimensional accuracy needed by the semi-automatic system, and the manufacturing equipment is not able to detect and reject these components before the assembling process, resulting in the production of defective sets. In order to overcome this problem, impossible to solve using the current semi-automatic equipment, a new solution was developed through a fully automated system under controlled costs, enabling the set manufacturing operation in a competitive way.

[1]  Johan Stahre,et al.  Enabling flexible manufacturing systems by using level of automation as design parameter , 2009, Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[2]  P. M. S. Nunes,et al.  Increasing Flexibility and Productivity in Small Assembly Operations: A Case Study , 2013 .

[3]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Agile manufacturing: framework and its empirical validation , 2014, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[4]  Luis Ribeiro,et al.  Re-thinking diagnosis for future automation systems: An analysis of current diagnostic practices and their applicability in emerging IT based production paradigms , 2011, Comput. Ind..

[5]  Yoram Koren,et al.  Product variety and manufacturing complexity in assembly systems and supply chains , 2008 .

[6]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  AGILE MANUFACTURING: ENABLERS AND AN IMPLEMENTATION FRAMEWORK , 1998 .

[7]  Fei Tao,et al.  Big Data in product lifecycle management , 2015, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

[8]  Edward G. Schilling,et al.  Juran's Quality Handbook , 1998 .

[9]  Andrew W. H. Ip,et al.  An intelligent production workflow mining system for continual quality enhancement , 2006 .

[10]  G. Seliger,et al.  Development of Hybrid Assembly Workplaces , 2007 .

[11]  Jörn-Henrik Thun,et al.  Feel free to feel comfortable—An empirical analysis of ergonomics in the German automotive industry , 2011 .

[12]  Jeffrey M. Alden,et al.  Agile manufacturing systems in the automotive industry , 2004 .

[13]  Mehmet Savsar Reliability analysis of a flexible manufacturing cell , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Gurunath V Shinde,et al.  Ergonomic analysis of an assembly workstation to identify time consuming and fatigue causing factors using application of motion study , 2012 .

[15]  Sotiris Makris,et al.  Automotive assembly technologies review: challenges and outlook for a flexible and adaptive approach , 2010 .

[16]  Raul D.S.G. Campilho,et al.  A novel concept of agile assembly machine for sets applied in the automotive industry , 2017 .

[17]  Francisco Silva,et al.  Manufacturing cushions and suspension mats for vehicle seats: a novel cell concept , 2017 .