Tilt Angle Optimization in Dynamic TDD mmWave Cellular Scenarios

With the introduction of massive MIMO and directional transmissions, antenna configuration has arisen as a major factor influencing coverage and capacity in fifth generation mobile networks. In particular, mechanical tilting can yield performance advancements that cannot be achieved by purely electronic steering, due to the presence of grating lobes and antenna pattern attenuations. In this letter, the performance of mmWave cellular systems is evaluated in terms of SINR when an adjacent-channel node is interfering with an (UL) transmission. We examine a mobile scenario complete with dynamic (TDD) and highlight how the optimization of the antenna tilt angle can drastically improve the overall network performance. Antenna down-tilt can be properly optimized according to both the environment and the antenna settings, thus reducing the overall interference level. We propose a general methodology and discuss a number of important network considerations, towards an effective optimization of the tilt angle. Our evaluation makes it possible to determine the best tilting configuration to be used, according to the scenario considered.

[1]  Alexey Khoryaev,et al.  Performance analysis of dynamic adjustment of TDD uplink-downlink configurations in outdoor picocell LTE networks , 2012, 2012 IV International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems.

[2]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Study of Realistic Antenna Patterns in 5G mmWave Cellular Scenarios , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[3]  Mounir Ghogho,et al.  Tilt Angle Optimization in Two-Tier Cellular Networks—A Stochastic Geometry Approach , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[4]  PoulkovVladimir,et al.  Dynamic Self-Optimization of the Antenna Tilt for Best Trade-off Between Coverage and Capacity in Mobile Networks , 2017 .

[5]  Tommy Svensson,et al.  Effect of Users Height Distribution on the Coverage of mmWave Cellular Networks With 3D Beamforming , 2019, IEEE Access.

[6]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Performance Assessment of MIMO Precoding on Realistic mmWave Channels , 2019, 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops).

[7]  Inkyu Lee,et al.  Energy efficiency maximization in mmWave wireless networks with 3D beamforming , 2019, Journal of Communications and Networks.

[8]  Howard H. Xia Adjacent Channel Interference , 1999 .

[9]  Xiaolin Hou,et al.  Dynamic TDD and interference management towards 5G , 2018, 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC).

[10]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Millimeter Wave Channel Modeling and Cellular Capacity Evaluation , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[11]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Stochastic Geometric Coverage Analysis in mmWave Cellular Networks With Realistic Channel and Antenna Radiation Models , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[12]  Vangelis Angelakis,et al.  Adjacent channel interference in 802.11a is harmful: Testbed validation of a simple quantification model , 2011, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[13]  Anja Klein,et al.  Dynamic Self-Optimization of the Antenna Tilt for Best Trade-off Between Coverage and Capacity in Mobile Networks , 2016, Wireless Personal Communications.

[14]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  Millimeter-Wave Cellular Wireless Networks: Potentials and Challenges , 2014, Proceedings of the IEEE.