British Hegelianism: A Non-Metaphysical View?

Of all the major episodes in Hegel's Rezeptionsgeschichte, British Hegelianism can seem the most foreign and outmoded, to have the least relevance to our current understanding of Hegel's thought. Even today, we are lead back to the Young Hegelians for the problems they pose in reading his work; we can sympathise with the concerns of Peirce, Royce and Dewey that drew them to him, and the interpretative picture they developed; we can take seriously the attempts by Croce and Gentile to bring about their “reforms”, given our contemporary ambivalence to his project; and we can see how in different ways the influence of Hegel on Kojève, Sartre, Lukács and the Frankfurt School have made some of his ideas central to our times. But few feel this sense of identification and illumination on encountering the work of Hegel's British interpreters from the turn of the century; rather, in their writings we seem to find a Hegel that is darker, more distant, more difficult for us to relate to contemporary concerns. This is not true in every respect, of course. In particular, several recent commentators have stressed how far it is possible to find here a reading and assessment of Hegel's political thought that does connect directly with many current issues, and that in this respect the thought of T H Green, Bernard Bosanquet and Henry Jones is not dead, either as a tradition within political philosophy, or as an interpretative approach to Hegel's theory of the state. Nonetheless, even those who seek to defend the importance of British Hegelianism in this regard clearly recognize that this is a fairly modest claim: for it fails to resurrect and revitalize the more fundamental aspect of the their encounter with Hegel, which was with his metaphysics – on which, as for Hegel, their political theories were based, rather than being primary in themselves. Those concerned with the political thought of the British Hegelians have not tried to take on this wider issue, leaving unchallenged the assumption that in their appropriation of his metaphysics, the British Hegelians have little to offer us either interpretatively or philosophically.

[1]  A. Vincent,et al.  A Radical Hegelian: The Political and Social Philosophy of Henry Jones , 1994 .

[2]  Andrew Bowie,et al.  On the history of modern philosophy , 1994 .

[3]  K. Tribe,et al.  The Rise of Neo-Kantianism. German Academic Philosophy between Idealism and Positivism , 1993 .

[4]  Frederick C. Beiser The Cambridge companion to Hegel , 1993 .

[5]  M. Frank Der unendliche Mangel an Sein. Schellings Hegelkritik und die Anfänge der Marxschen Dialektik , 1992 .

[6]  S. Clark,et al.  The Political Philosophy of the British Idealists , 1991 .

[7]  R. Hollingdale,et al.  The Rise of Neo-Kantianism: German Academic Philosophy between Idealism and Positivism , 1991 .

[8]  Andrew Bowie The Actuality of Schelling's Hegel-Critique , 1990, Hegel Bulletin.

[9]  P. Hylton Russell, Idealism, And The Emergence Of Analytic Philosophy , 1990 .

[10]  Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften,et al.  Metaphysik nach Kant , 1988 .

[11]  Michael Rosen “From Vorstellung to Thought: Is a ‘Non-Metaphysical’ View of Hegel possible?” , 1988 .

[12]  L. Feuerbach,et al.  Principles of the philosophy of the future , 1986 .

[13]  D. Papineau Realism and Epistemology , 1985 .

[14]  A. White Absolute Knowledge: Hegel and the Problem of Metaphysics , 1983 .

[15]  P. Robbins The British Hegelians 1875–1925 , 1982 .

[16]  J. Bradley HEGEL IN BRITAIN: A BRIEF HISTORY OF BRITISH COMMENTARY AND ATTITUDES (2) , 1979 .

[17]  J. Bradley HEGEL IN BRITAIN : A BRIEF HISTORY OF BRITISH COMMENTARY AND ATTITUDES (1) , 1979 .

[18]  G. Bedell Bradley and Hegel , 1977 .

[19]  A. Macintyre Hegel: A collection of critical essays , 1976 .

[20]  L. Easton,et al.  The young Hegelians , 1971 .

[21]  J. Findlay,et al.  Hegel: A Re-examination. , 1960 .

[22]  Thomas Blakeley,et al.  Hegel. A Re–examination , 1959 .

[23]  J. Findlay Hegel, a re-examination , 1958 .

[24]  W. Schulz Die Vollendung des deutschen Idealismus in der Spätphilosophie Schellings , 1955 .

[25]  B. Russell History of Western philosophy , 1949 .

[26]  J. Horst Philosophical Fragments or a Fragment of Philosophy , 1937 .

[27]  F. Bradley Essays on Truth and Reality , 1914 .

[28]  F. Bradley The principles of logic , 1905 .

[29]  John McTaggart Ellis McTaggart,et al.  Studies In The Hegelian Dialectic , 1897 .

[30]  A. Seth HEGELIANISM AND ITS CRITICS , 1894 .

[31]  H. Jones III.— IDEALISM AND EPISTEMOLOGY. (II.) , 1893 .

[32]  Jones I.—IDEALISM AND EPISTEMOLOGY , 1893 .

[33]  D. G. Ritchie What is Reality , 1892 .

[34]  J. Mctaggart II.—THE CHANGES OF METHOD IN HEGEL'S DIALECTIC. (II.) , 1892 .

[35]  F. Schiller,et al.  Darwin and Hegel , 1891 .

[36]  A. Seth Hegelianism and Personality , 1887 .

[37]  A. Seth V.—HEGEL: AN EXPOSITION AND CRITICISM , 1881 .

[38]  J. Stirling The Secret of Hegel , 1865 .

[39]  S. Kierkegaard,et al.  Philosophical Fragments or a Fragment of Philosophy , 1844 .