Effects of straw polls on group decision making: Sequential voting pattern, timing, and local majorities.

[1]  P. R. Laughlin,et al.  Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. , 1986 .

[2]  N. Pennington,et al.  Inside the Jury. , 1985 .

[3]  N. Kerr,et al.  The effects of jury size and polling method on the process and product of jury deliberation. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Steven D. Penrod,et al.  Social Influence Model: A formal integration of research on majority and minority influence processes. , 1984 .

[5]  Clyde H. Coombs,et al.  An Empirical Study of Some Election Systems , 1984 .

[6]  Garold Stasser,et al.  Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model. , 1981 .

[7]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  The analysis of cross-classified categorical data , 1980 .

[8]  F. Levine,et al.  Law, Justice, and the Individual in Society: Psychological and Legal Issues , 1977 .

[9]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[10]  R. Bray,et al.  The empirical study of decision processes in juries: A critical review , 1976 .

[11]  Robert W. Holt,et al.  Changes in group members' decision preferences during discussion: An illustration with mock juries. , 1976 .

[12]  Stuart S. Nagel,et al.  Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis , 1976 .

[13]  Alan E. Gelfand,et al.  Analyzing the Decision-Making Process of the American Jury , 1975 .

[14]  M. Degroot.  Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[15]  Alan E. Gelfand,et al.  Modeling Jury Verdicts in the American Legal System , 1974 .

[16]  Alan E. Gelfand,et al.  A Study of Poisson's Models for Jury Verdicts in Criminal and Civil Trials , 1973 .

[17]  J. H. Davis.  Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. , 1973 .

[18]  P. Suppes,et al.  Mathematical methods in small group processes , 1963 .

[19]  N. Kerr,et al.  Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: jurors' bias for leniency. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  J. M. Dabbs,et al.  Dimensions of Group Process: Amount and Structure of Vocal Interaction , 1987 .

[21]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Thought experiments and the problem of sparse data in small-group performance research. , 1986 .

[22]  C. Nemeth.  Differential contributions of majority and minority influence , 1986 .

[23]  Carol Sherrard,et al.  The power of minorities , 1982 .

[24]  Norbert L. Kerr,et al.  Social transition schemes: Model, method, and applications , 1982 .

[25]  Paul B. Paulus,et al.  Psychology of Group Influence , 1981 .

[26]  Craig E. Spitzer,et al.  The effects of consensus requirements and multiple decisions on mock juror verdict preferences , 1981 .

[27]  M. Fishbein.  Progress in social psychology , 1980 .

[28]  Vernon L. Allen,et al.  Social Support for Nonconformity , 1975 .

[29]  S. Moscovici,et al.  Social Influence, Conformity Bias, and the Study of Active Minorities , 1972 .

[30]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[31]  R. Baron,et al.  Why do Groups Make Riskier Decisions Than Individuals?1 , 1970 .

[32]  V. L. Allen.  Situational Factors In Conformity1 , 1965 .

[33]  S. Asch.  Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .

[34]  H. Kelley,et al.  Communication And Persuasion , 1953 .