Soil Resilient Modulus Regressed from Physical Properties and Influence of Seasonal Variation on Asphalt Pavement Performance

Subgrade soil, as the critical underlying support for other pavement layers and traffic loads, should be stiff enough to maintain the integrity of pavement structures and the smoothness of pavement surface. The resilient modulus, as an indicator of subgrade stiffness, is an essential input in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). At input level 1 of MEPDG, the MEPDG generalized model is required to describe resilient modulus of subgrade soil, and the coefficients of this model are used for pavement design. The change of the resilient modulus model has raised the interest of many state highway agencies and made it necessary to convert old resilient modulus test data into new ones required for the MEPDG model. In this study, the coefficients of the generalized and the universal models for soil resilient modulus were obtained through regression of the results of 13 soils in Tennessee. The coefficients of the two models were also compared. There is a potential risk that the coefficients from the universal model may be mistakenly used in the MEPDG instead of those coefficients from the generalized model. The consequence of this improper use was demonstrated in the comparison between the miscalculated and the real resilient moduli. The coefficients of the generalized model were correlated to soil physical properties, which provided an alternate time-saving and economical method to obtain soil resilient modulus as level 2 inputs. The coefficients were obtained at different post-compaction water contents, to allow the estimation of pavement response under seasonal moisture variation of subgrade. Rutting and roughness of two typical pavement sections were analyzed to investigate the influence of the seasonal variation of soil resilient modulus on pavement performance. The results showed that moisture variation had a significant effect on subgrade resilient modulus and, subsequently, on pavement performance. It is recommended that seasonal change in soil resilient modulus be considered in the analysis on pavement performance.

[1]  M Shabbir Hossain.  Characterization of Subgrade Resilient Modulus for Virginia Soils and Its Correlation with the Results of Other Soil Tests , 2008 .

[2]  W. Y. Gehling,et al.  Seasonal Variations of a Subgrade Soil Resilient Modulus in Southern Brazil , 2004 .

[3]  Anand J. Puppala,et al.  Regression Model for Resilient Modulus of Subgrade Soils , 1999 .

[4]  K P George,et al.  PREDICTION OF RESILIENT MODULUS FROM SOIL INDEX PROPERTIES , 2004 .

[5]  Chaney,et al.  Alternative test method for resilient modulus of fine-grained subgrades , 1996 .

[6]  Robert L. Lytton,et al.  Development and validation of realistic pavement response models , 1992 .

[7]  W. Ping,et al.  A Rational Approach for Estimating the Resilient Modulus of Constructed Granular Subgrade Materials , 2012 .

[8]  Roy H. Borden,et al.  Inverse Analysis of Plate Load Tests to Assess Subgrade Resilient Modulus , 2009 .

[9]  Matthew W Witczak,et al.  PREDICTION OF SUBGRADE MODULI FOR SOIL THAT EXHIBITS NONLINEAR BEHAVIOR , 1981 .

[10]  H Von Quintus,et al.  Analysis Relating to Pavement Material Characterizations and their Effects on Pavement Performance , 1998 .

[11]  Tommy C. Hopkins,et al.  Resilient Modulus of Kentucky Soils , 2004 .

[12]  Syed Waqar Haider,et al.  Backcalculated and Laboratory-Measured Resilient Modulus Values , 2009 .

[13]  Ramesh B. Malla,et al.  Subgrade resilient modulus prediction models for coarse and fine-grained soils based on long-term pavement performance data , 2008 .

[14]  Edward T. Harrigan,et al.  NAtioNAl CooperAtive HigHwAy reseArCH progrAm , 2013 .

[15]  Louay N. Mohammad,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Subgrade Resilient Modulus from Non-destructive, In-situ, and Laboratory Methods , 2007 .

[16]  Biqing Sheng,et al.  Developing Correlation Relationship between Modulus of Subgrade Reaction and Resilient Modulus for Florida Subgrade Soils , 2011 .

[17]  Fouad Bayomy,et al.  Implementation of the MEPDG for Flexible Pavements in Idaho , 2012 .

[18]  Eric C. Drumm,et al.  Subgrade Resilient Modulus Correction for Saturation Effects , 1999 .

[19]  Harold L. Von Quintus,et al.  Predicting Elastic Response Characteristics of Unbound Materials and Soils , 2004 .

[20]  Sam Helwany,et al.  Determination of Typical Resilient Modulus Values for Selected Soils in Wisconsin , 2006 .

[21]  Eric C. Drumm,et al.  RESILIENT RESPONSE OF TENNESSEE SUBGRADES, PHASE II: VERIFICATION OF PREDICTION METHODS - VOLUME 2: DESIGN HANDBOOK OF INDEX PROPERTIES AND RESILIENT RESPONSE. FINAL REPORT , 1995 .

[22]  Ahmed Shalaby,et al.  Characterising the elastic behaviour of fine-grained subgrade soils under traffic loading , 2014 .

[23]  E. Drumm,et al.  Environmental Effects on the Predicted Service Life of Flexible Pavements , 2007 .

[24]  J L Figueroa.  MONITORING AND ANALYSIS OF DATA OBTAINED FROM MOISTURE TEMPERATURE RECORDING STATIONS , 2001 .

[25]  S. Emerson,et al.  AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials). 2001. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Fourth Edition. Washington, D.C. , 2007 .

[26]  Louay N. Mohammad,et al.  Estimation of Resilient Modulus of Subgrade Soils Using Falling Weight Deflectometer , 2010 .