Continuous evaluation of dairy cattle with a random regression test-day model requires a fast solving method and algorithm. A new computing technique feasible in Jacobi and conjugate gradient based iterative methods using iteration on data is presented. In the new computing technique, the calculations in multiplication of a vector by a matrix were recorded to three steps instead of the commonly used two steps. The three-step method was implemented in a general mixed linear model program that used preconditioned conjugate gradient iteration. Performance of this program in comparison to other general solving programs was assessed via estimation of breeding values using univariate, multivariate, and random regression test-day models. Central processing unit time per iteration with the new three-step technique was, at best, one-third that needed with the old technique. Performance was best with the test-day model, which was the largest and most complex model used. The new program did well in comparison to other general software. Programs keeping the mixed model equations in random access memory required at least 20 and 435% more time to solve the univariate and multivariate animal models, respectively. Computations of the second best iteration on data took approximately three and five times longer for the animal and test-day models, respectively, than did the new program. Good performance was due to fast computing time per iteration and quick convergence to the final solutions. Use of preconditioned conjugate gradient based methods in solving large breeding value problems is supported by our findings.
[1]
W. G. Hill,et al.
Estimating the covariance structure of traits during growth and ageing, illustrated with lactation in dairy cattle.
,
1994,
Genetical research.
[2]
Successive Overrelaxation, Block Iteration, and Method of Conjugate Gradients for Solving Equations for Multiple Trait Evaluation of Sires
,
1985
.
[3]
Gene H. Golub,et al.
Some History of the Conjugate Gradient and Lanczos Algorithms: 1948-1976
,
1989,
SIAM Rev..
[5]
Animal Model Evaluation in Finland: Experience with Two Algorithms
,
1992
.
[6]
Continuous Genetic Evaluation of Holsteins for Type
,
1991
.
[7]
L. R. Schaeffer,et al.
Computing Strategies for Solving Mixed Model Equations
,
1986
.
[8]
Richard Barrett,et al.
Templates for the Solution of Linear Systems: Building Blocks for Iterative Methods
,
1994,
Other Titles in Applied Mathematics.
[9]
Daniel Gianola,et al.
Indirect Solution of Mixed Model Equations
,
1987
.
[10]
E. Groeneveld,et al.
PEST, a general purpose BLUP package for multivariate prediction and estimation.
,
1990
.
[11]
Eildert Groeneveld,et al.
A Generalized Computing Procedure for Setting Up and Solving Mixed Linear Models
,
1990
.