The many reasons your mileage may vary: Toward a unifying typology of eco-driving behaviors

Abstract The role of vehicle driver behavior has been ignored in prior energy and environmental policy making. Laboratory procedures that produce the fuel economy estimates posted on every new car sold in the US are designed to preclude the effects of differences between drivers. Yet, every vehicle states the caveat, “Actual results will vary for many reasons, including driving conditions and how you drive and maintain your vehicle.” Eco-driving as means of strategically taking advantage of this variability has been inconsistently defined in conceptual analyses and variously operationalized in empirical analyses. The present research clarifies, synthesizes, and expands on prior definitions of eco-driving to develop a comprehensive and precise definition and typology of eco-driving behaviors. The resultant typology includes six mutually exclusive classes of behavior: driving, cabin comfort, trip planning, load management, fueling, and maintenance. This typology establishes a basis for systematic research to determine energy and climate impacts and develop effective policies and interventions for different types of eco-driving.

[1]  Rochdi Trigui,et al.  Eco-driving: An economic or ecologic driving style? , 2014 .

[2]  Michael Sivak,et al.  Eco-driving: Strategic, tactical, and operational decisions of the driver that influence vehicle fuel economy , 2012 .

[3]  Aonghus McNabola,et al.  A critical review and assessment of Eco-Driving policy & technology: Benefits & limitations , 2014 .

[4]  Joonwoo Son,et al.  Analysis of three independent real-world driving studies : a data driven and expert analysis approach to determining parameters affecting fuel economy , 2014 .

[5]  Eva Ericsson,et al.  Independent driving pattern factors and their influence on fuel-use and exhaust emission factors , 2001 .

[6]  R. Malott,et al.  Principles of Behavior , 2007 .

[7]  Mascha C. van der Voort,et al.  A prototype fuel-efficiency support tool , 2001 .

[8]  P. Stern.  Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. , 2011, The American psychologist.

[9]  Hesham Rakha,et al.  Network-wide impacts of eco-routing strategies: A large-scale case study , 2013 .

[10]  Chris S Dula,et al.  Risky, aggressive, or emotional driving: addressing the need for consistent communication in research. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[11]  Anders af Wåhlberg,et al.  Long-term effects of training in economical driving: Fuel consumption, accidents, driver acceleration behavior and technical feedback , 2007 .

[12]  Kyoungho Ahn,et al.  COMPARATIVE FIELD EVALUATION OF VEHICLE CRUISE SPEED AND ACCELERATION LEVEL IMPACTS ON HOT STABILIZED EMISSIONS , 2005 .

[13]  Patricia Delhomme,et al.  The influence of multiple goals on driving behavior: the case of safety, time saving, and fuel saving. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  E Scott Geller,et al.  An instrumented vehicle assessment of problem behavior and driving style: do younger males really take more risks? , 2002, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  G. T. Gardner,et al.  Household actions can provide a behavioral wedge to rapidly reduce US carbon emissions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  J. Barkenbus.  Eco-driving: An overlooked climate change initiative , 2010 .

[17]  Jeffrey Gonder,et al.  Final Report on the Fuel Saving Effectiveness of Various Driver Feedback Approaches , 2011 .

[18]  P. Leavy,et al.  The Practice of Qualitative Research , 2005 .

[19]  S. Azzi,et al.  Eco-Driving Performance Assessment With in-Car Visual and Haptic Feedback Assistance , 2010, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[20]  Steven Broekx,et al.  Using on-board logging devices to study the longer-term impact of an eco-driving course , 2009 .

[21]  D L Greene,et al.  DRIVER ENERGY CONSERVATION AWARENESS TRAINING: REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR A NATIONAL PROGRAM , 1986 .