The influence of students' cognitive and motivational characteristics on students' use of a 4C/ID-based online learning environment and their learning gain

Research has revealed that the design of online learning environments can influence students' use and performance. In this study, an online learning environment for learning French as a foreign language was developed in line with the four component instructional design (4C/ID) model. While the 4C/ID-model is a well-established instructional design model, little is known about (1) factors impacting students' use of the four components, namely, learning tasks, part-task practice, supportive and procedural information during their learning process as well as about (2) the way in which students' differences in use of the 4C/ID-based online learning environment impacts course performance. The aim of this study is, therefore, twofold. Firstly, it investigates the influence of students' prior knowledge, task value and self-efficacy on students' use of the four different components of the 4C/ID-model. Secondly, it examines the influence of students' use of the components on their learning gain, taking into account their characteristics. The sample consisted of 161 students in higher education. Results, based on structural equation modelling (SEM), indicate that prior knowledge has a negative influence on students' use of learning tasks and part-task practice. Task value has a positive influence on use of learning tasks and supportive information. Additionally, results indicate that use of use of learning tasks, procedural information, controlled for students' prior knowledge significantly contribute to students' learning gain. Results suggest that students' use of the four components is based on their cognitive and motivational characteristics. Furthermore, results reveal the impact of students' use of learning tasks and procedural information on students' learning gain.

[1]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Self-efficacy and prior domain knowledge: to what extent does monitoring mediate their relationship with hypermedia learning? , 2009 .

[2]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Exploring differences between gifted and grade-level students' use of self-regulatory learning processes with hypermedia , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  The relationships between learner variables, tool-usage behaviour and performance , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  Michelle Taub,et al.  Can the use of cognitive and metacognitive self-regulated learning strategies be predicted by learners' levels of prior knowledge in hypermedia-learning environments? , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[6]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Productive use of learning resources in an online problem-based learning environment , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model , 2002 .

[8]  R. Azevedo,et al.  A Theoretical Review of Winne and Hadwin’s Model of Self-Regulated Learning: New Perspectives and Directions , 2007 .

[9]  Jan Elen,et al.  Effects of opportunities to learn in teacher education on the development of teachers’ professional knowledge of French as a foreign language , 2017 .

[10]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  The relation between self-regulation and the embedding of support in learning environments , 2010 .

[11]  Chia-Wen Tsai,et al.  An effective online teaching method: the combination of collaborative learning with initiation and self-regulation learning with feedback , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[12]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  Content Management Systems: Enriched learning opportunities for all? , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[13]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[14]  Theo J. Bastiaens,et al.  The impact of intrinsic motivation on e-learning in authentic computer tasks , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[15]  W. Lan,et al.  Self-regulation across time of first-generation online learners , 2010 .

[16]  P. Bentler,et al.  A Two-Stage Approach to Missing Data: Theory and Application to Auxiliary Variables , 2009 .

[17]  Mimi Bong,et al.  Role of Self-Efficacy and Task-Value in Predicting College Students' Course Performance and Future Enrollment Intentions. , 2001, Contemporary educational psychology.

[18]  Jan L. Plass,et al.  Interplay of prior knowledge, self-regulation and motivation in complex multimedia learning environments , 2016, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[19]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. , 1990 .

[20]  Kuan-Chung Chen,et al.  Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[22]  Furman S. McDonald,et al.  E-Learning: Is There Anything Special about the "E"? , 2008, Perspectives in biology and medicine.

[23]  P. Kirschner,et al.  Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning , 2003 .

[24]  JooYoung Ju,et al.  Locus of control, self-efficacy, and task value as predictors of learning outcome in an online university context , 2013 .

[25]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[26]  Bart Rienties,et al.  The impact of learning design on student behaviour, satisfaction and performance: A cross-institutional comparison across 151 modules , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Jan Elen,et al.  In search of attributes that support self-regulation in blended learning environments , 2017, Education and Information Technologies.

[28]  A GreeneJeffrey,et al.  Exploring differences between gifted and grade-level students' use of self-regulatory learning processes with hypermedia , 2008 .

[29]  Dirk T. Tempelaar,et al.  The role of academic motivation in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Martin J. Goedhart,et al.  The influence of student characteristics on the use of adaptive e-learning material , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[31]  Dominique Sluijsmans,et al.  Toward a Synthesis of Cognitive Load Theory, Four-Component Instructional Design, and Self-Directed Learning , 2009 .

[32]  Y. Nie,et al.  The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcome , 2008 .

[33]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  Students' tool-use within a web enhanced course: Explanatory mechanisms of students' tool-use pattern , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..