Analyzing the effects of geological and parameter uncertainty on prediction of groundwater head and travel time

Uncertainty of groundwater model predictions has in the past mostly been related to uncertainty in the hydraulic parameters, whereas uncertainty in the geological structure has not been considered to the same extent. Recent developments in theoretical methods for quantifying geological uncertainty have made it possible to consider this factor in groundwater modeling. In this study we have applied the multiple-point geostatistical method (MPS) integrated in the Stanford Geostatistical Modeling Software (SGeMS) for exploring the impact of geological uncertainty on groundwater flow patterns for a site in Denmark. Realizations from the geostatistical model were used as input to a groundwater model developed from Modular three-dimensional finitedifference ground-water model (MODFLOW) within the Groundwater Modeling System (GMS) modeling environment. The uncertainty analysis was carried out in three scenarios involving simulation of groundwater head distribution and travel time. The first scenario implied 100 stochastic geological models all assigning the same hydraulic parameters for the same geological units. In the second scenario the same 100 geological models were subjected to model optimization, where the hydraulic parameters for each of them were estimated by calibration against observations of hydraulic head and stream discharge. In the third scenario each geological model was run with 216 randomized sets of parameters. The analysis documented that the uncertainty on the conceptual geological model was as significant as the uncertainty related to the embedded hydraulic parameters.

[1]  You‐Kuan Zhang.  Stochastic Methods for Flow in Porous Media: Coping with Uncertainties , 2001 .

[2]  Esben Auken,et al.  SkyTEM–a New High-resolution Helicopter Transient Electromagnetic System , 2004 .

[3]  Andre G. Journel,et al.  Beyond Covariance: The Advent of Multiple-Point Geostatistics , 2005 .

[4]  Michael D. Dettinger,et al.  First order analysis of uncertainty in numerical models of groundwater flow part: 1. Mathematical development , 1981 .

[5]  Eileen P. Poeter,et al.  Uncertainty Associated with Semivariograms Used for Site Simulation , 1993 .

[6]  Tian-Chyi J. Yeh,et al.  Applied Stochastic Hydrogeology. , 2005 .

[7]  Andre G. Journel,et al.  New method for reservoir mapping , 1990 .

[8]  Philippe Renard,et al.  Stochastic Hydrogeology: What Professionals Really Need? , 2007, Ground water.

[9]  Jef Caers,et al.  Multiple-point Geostatistics: A Quantitative Vehicle for Integrating Geologic Analogs into Multiple Reservoir Models , 2004 .

[10]  Peter Dietrich,et al.  An inversion strategy for hydraulic tomography: Coupling travel time and amplitude inversion , 2007 .

[11]  G. Fogg,et al.  Transition probability-based indicator geostatistics , 1996 .

[12]  Philippe Renard,et al.  Truncated Plurigaussian Simulations to Characterize Aquifer Heterogeneity , 2009, Ground water.

[13]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[14]  S. Strebelle.  Sequential Simulation for Modeling Geological Structures from Training Images , 2006 .

[15]  Stefan Piasecki,et al.  Lithostratigraphy of the Upper Oligocene - Miocene succession of Denmark , 2010 .

[16]  Sebastien Strebelle,et al.  Conditional Simulation of Complex Geological Structures Using Multiple-Point Statistics , 2002 .

[17]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[18]  Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.  A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model , 1984 .

[19]  K. Abbaspour,et al.  Procedures for Uncertainty Analyses Applied to a Landfill Leachate Plume , 1998 .

[20]  Esben Auken,et al.  Combined interpretation of SkyTEM and high-resolution seismic data , 2011 .

[21]  R. Freeze.  A stochastic‐conceptual analysis of one‐dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media , 1975 .

[22]  Cheng Cheng,et al.  Evaluation of methods for determination of hydraulic properties in an aquifer–aquitard system hydrologically connected to a river , 2007 .

[23]  Mary P. Anderson,et al.  Simulation of Preferential Flow in Three-Dimensional, Heterogeneous Conductivity Fields with Realistic Internal Architecture , 1996 .

[24]  Alexandre Boucher,et al.  Considering complex training images with search tree partitioning , 2009, Comput. Geosci..

[25]  J. P. Delhomme,et al.  Spatial variability and uncertainty in groundwater flow parameters: A geostatistical approach , 1979 .

[26]  Philippe Renard,et al.  3D multiple-point statistics simulation using 2D training images , 2012, Comput. Geosci..

[27]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Methodology for construction, calibration and validation of a national hydrological model for Denmark , 2003 .

[28]  Arlen W. Harbaugh,et al.  MODFLOW-2000, The U.S. Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model - User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process , 2000 .

[29]  Mario L. V. Martina,et al.  Reply to comment by Keith Beven, Paul Smith and Jim Freer on “Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology” , 2007 .

[30]  Steven F. Carle,et al.  CONDITIONAL SIMULATION OF HYDROFACIES ARCHITECTURE: A TRANSITION PROBABILITY/MARKOV APPROACH1 , 1998 .

[31]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[32]  L. Feyen,et al.  Quantifying geological uncertainty for flow and transport modeling in multi-modal heterogeneous formations , 2006 .

[33]  A. Christiansen,et al.  Iterative modelling of AEM data based on a priori information from seismic and borehole data , 2014 .

[34]  Yuhong Liu,et al.  Using the Snesim program for multiple-point statistical simulation , 2006, Comput. Geosci..

[35]  J. Doherty,et al.  A hybrid regularized inversion methodology for highly parameterized environmental models , 2005 .

[36]  C. L. Winter,et al.  Stochastic hydrology: practical alternatives exist , 2004 .

[37]  Andre G. Journel,et al.  A WORKFLOW FOR MULTIPLE-POINT GEOSTATISTICAL SIMULATION , 2005 .

[38]  Keith Beven,et al.  Stochastic capture zone delineation within the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation methodology: Conditioning on head observations , 2001 .

[39]  Y. Rubin.  Applied Stochastic Hydrogeology , 2003 .

[40]  R. M. Srivastava,et al.  Multivariate Geostatistics: Beyond Bivariate Moments , 1993 .

[41]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Review of strategies for handling geological uncertainty in groundwater flow and transport modeling , 2012 .

[42]  Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen,et al.  Joint estimation of transmissivities and recharges—application: stochastic characterization of well capture zones , 2004 .

[43]  小川 勇二郎,et al.  第1回 SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) テーマミーティング出席報告 , 1991 .

[44]  David W. Pollock,et al.  User's guide for MODPATH/MODPATH-PLOT, Version 3; a particle tracking post-processing package for MODFLOW, the U.S. Geological Survey finite-difference ground-water flow model , 1994 .

[45]  Graham E Fogg,et al.  River‐Aquifer Interactions, Geologic Heterogeneity, and Low‐Flow Management , 2006, Ground water.

[46]  Alexandre Boucher,et al.  Applied Geostatistics with SGeMS: Bibliography , 2009 .

[47]  H. Baalousha.  Modelling surface–groundwater interaction in the Ruataniwha basin, Hawke’s Bay, New Zealand , 2012, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[48]  J. Vrugt,et al.  Inverse Modeling of Subsurface Flow and Transport Properties: A Review with New Developments , 2008 .

[49]  Hans Jørgen Henriksen,et al.  Capture zone, travel time, and solute-transport predictions using inverse modeling and different geological models , 2003 .

[50]  P. Adler,et al.  Multiple-Point Statistics for Modeling Facies Heterogeneities in a Porous Medium: The Komadugu-Yobe Alluvium, Lake Chad Basin , 2011 .

[51]  Jef Caers,et al.  Geostatistical Reservoir Modelling using Statistical Pattern Recognition , 2001 .

[52]  P. Mantovan,et al.  Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: Incoherence of the GLUE methodology , 2006 .

[53]  Katherine A. Klise,et al.  Exploring solute transport and streamline connectivity using lidar‐based outcrop images and geostatistical representations of heterogeneity , 2009 .

[54]  Jef Caers,et al.  Direct Pattern-Based Simulation of Non-stationary Geostatistical Models , 2012, Mathematical Geosciences.

[55]  Alexandre Boucher,et al.  Applied Geostatistics with SGeMS: Preface , 2009 .

[56]  Flemming Jørgensen,et al.  Buried and open tunnel valleys in Denmark—erosion beneath multiple ice sheets , 2006 .

[57]  Nicholas M. Johnson.  Characterization of alluvial hydrostratigraphy with indicator semivariograms , 1995 .

[58]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Analysis of the Spatial Structure of Properties of Selected Aquifers , 1985 .

[59]  Joel Massmann,et al.  Hydrogeological Decision Analysis: 1. A Framework , 1990 .

[60]  Ahmed E. Hassan,et al.  Uncertainty assessment of a stochastic groundwater flow model using GLUE analysis , 2008 .

[61]  Simon Stisen,et al.  Evaluation of Climate Input Biases and Water Balance Issues Using a Coupled Surface–Subsurface Model , 2011 .

[62]  P. Renard,et al.  Three-dimensional high resolution fluvio-glacial aquifer analog - Part 2: Geostatistical modeling , 2011 .

[63]  R. Olea.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation By Pierre Goovaerts, Oxford University Press, Applied Geostatistics Series, 1997, 483 p., hardcover, $65 (U.S.), ISBN 0-19-511538-4 , 1999 .

[64]  A. Journel,et al.  The Necessity of a Multiple-Point Prior Model , 2007 .