Unit-segment Analysis: A Space Syntax Approach to Capturing Vehicular Travel Behavior Emulating Configurational Properties of Roadway Structures

One of the critical concerns of axial analysis, a space syntax approach to capturing vehicular travel behavior emulating configurational properties of roadway structures, is the absence of the time-cost consideration while dealing with route-choice problems encountered in grid-like urban textures. This study shows that the time-cost parameter of travel can also be introduced into the syntax approach to capturing the route-choice decisions for the purpose of modeling vehicular movement networks with greater accuracy. Assuming that roadway units are trip-origins and trip-destinations and that they also act as connecting route segments among each other, a theoretical foundation has been proposed showing how the mobility characteristics of these units, in terms of the time-cost of travel, influence their accessibility measures or syntax integrations. These new roadway units are the unit segments, and their integrations are found to be better indicators of vehicular trip-makers’ route-choice decisions than axial integrations. Conclusions suggest that the unit-segment analysis of an urban grid captures the general behavior of vehicular flow by substantiating the fact that trip-makers tend to pick a specific set of roadway units that not only comprise the close connection between a triporigin and a trip-destination but also consume less time for travel.

[1]  Alasdair Turner,et al.  From Axial to Road-Centre Lines: A New Representation for Space Syntax and a New Model of Route Choice for Transport Network Analysis , 2007 .

[2]  Mahbub Rashid,et al.  The structure of urban space, movement and co-presence: The case of Atlanta , 1997 .

[3]  Lucas Figueiredo,et al.  Continuity lines in the axial system , 2005 .

[4]  Abhijit Paul An integrated approach to modeling vehicular movement networks : Trip assignment and space syntax , 2009 .

[5]  Alan Penn,et al.  CONFIGURATIONAL MODELLING OF URBAN MOVEMENT NETWORKS (CHAPTER 19 OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH: UPDATING THE STATE OF PLAY) , 1998 .

[6]  C. Ratti Space Syntax: Some Inconsistencies , 2004 .

[7]  Julienne Hanson,et al.  Syntactic Analysis of Settlements , 1987 .

[8]  A Turner,et al.  Depthmap: a program to perform visibility graph analysis , 2001 .

[9]  S. Hanson,et al.  The Geography Of Urban Transportation , 1986 .

[10]  L. Amorim,et al.  Decoding the urban grid: or why cities are neither trees nor perfect grids , 2007 .

[11]  A. Turner,et al.  Space Layout Affects Search Efficiency for Agents with Vision , 2003 .

[12]  Abhijit Paul,et al.  Axial Analysis: A Syntactic Approach to Movement Network Modeling , 2011 .

[13]  Bill Hillier,et al.  The social logic of space: Buildings and their genotypes , 1984 .

[14]  Alan Penn,et al.  Natural Movement: Or, Configuration and Attraction in Urban Pedestrian Movement , 1993 .

[15]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Network effects and psychological effects: a theory of urban movement , 2005 .

[16]  Peter C. Dawson,et al.  Analysing the effects of spatial configuration on human movement and social interaction in Canadian Arctic communities , 2003 .

[17]  Vice President,et al.  Institute of Transportation Engineers , 2010 .

[18]  Bill Hillier,et al.  The Hidden Geometry of Deformed Grids: Or, Why Space Syntax Works, When it Looks as Though it Shouldn't , 1999 .

[19]  K Karimi,et al.  The tale of two cities: Urban planning of the city Isfahan in the past and present , 2003 .