Planning Unidirectional Flushing Operations as a Response to Drinking Water Distribution System Contamination

This paper addresses the issue of contaminated water evacuation as part of the response process in cases of intentional or accidental contamination of drinking water distribution systems (DWDSs). Following a previous study which addressed contaminant isolation, an original flushing procedure (FP) is introduced. Through a heuristic set of rules, the FP defines unidirectional flushing (UDF) strategies in a safe, structured, and efficient manner. In addition to the rather theoretical considerations related to hydraulics modeling, the FP also takes into account the operational issues of UDF implementation. Compared to other similar studies, the latter aspect establishes the main contribution of this paper. The FP has been applied to two real-world networks and application of the heuristic rules is demonstrated with the aid of a detailed example. General results suggest possible improvements to existing network configurations and to the design of projected networks to better support contamination response plan...

[1]  Olivier Piller,et al.  Battle of the Water Sensor Networks , 2008 .

[2]  Dan. Ellison Investigation of Pipe Cleaning Methods , 2003 .

[3]  Larry W. Mays,et al.  Battle of the network models: Epilogue , 1987 .

[4]  Robert D. Carr,et al.  Designing Contamination Warning Systems for Municipal Water Networks Using Imperfect Sensors , 2009 .

[5]  Louis Delorme,et al.  Heuristic Approach for Operational Response to Drinking Water Contamination , 2008 .

[6]  Jan Vreeburg Discolouration in drinking water systems: a particular approach , 2007 .

[7]  A. Preis,et al.  Genetic algorithm for contaminant source characterization using imperfect sensors , 2008 .

[8]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  Mixed-Integer Approach for Obtaining Unique Solutions in Source Inversion of Water Networks , 2006 .

[9]  Edward N. Antoun,et al.  Unidirectional flushing: a powerful tool , 1999 .

[10]  Terranna M. Baranowski,et al.  Consequence Management Utilizing Optimization , 2008 .

[11]  Don J. Wood,et al.  Reliability of Algorithms for Pipe Network Analysis , 1981 .

[12]  Gregory J. Kirmeyer,et al.  Developing and Implementing a Distribution System Flushing Program , 2002 .

[13]  T. Walski,et al.  Modeling a Hydraulic Response to a Contamination Event , 2009 .

[14]  Steven G. Buchberger,et al.  Assessing Intrusion Susceptibility in Distribution Systems , 2002 .

[15]  Kenneth Carlson,et al.  Expanded Summary: Modeling intentional distribution system Contamination and Detection , 2005 .

[16]  Avi Ostfeld,et al.  Multiobjective contaminant response modeling for water distribution systems security , 2008 .

[17]  J. Defrank Catalytic Enzyme-Based Methods for Water Treatment and Water Distribution System Decontamination. 1. Literature Survey , 2006 .

[18]  Gregg Kirmeyer,et al.  What to Do With Unavoidable Dead Ends , 2007 .

[19]  E. J. LeBoeuf,et al.  Consequence Management Optimization for Contaminant Detection and Isolation , 2006 .

[20]  Marco Propato Contamination Warning in Water Networks: General Mixed-Integer Linear Models for Sensor Location Design , 2006 .

[21]  Rolf A. Deininger,et al.  Safeguarding The Security Of Public Water Supplies Using Early Warning Systems: A Brief Review , 2009 .