Design of robust flow processing networks with time-programmed responses

Abstract Can artificially designed networks reach the levels of robustness against local damage which are comparable with those of the biochemical networks of a living cell? We consider a simple model where the flow applied to an input node propagates through the network and arrives at different times to the output nodes, thus generating a pattern of coordinated responses. By using evolutionary optimization algorithms, functional networks – with required time-programmed responses – were constructed. Then, continuing the evolution, such networks were additionally optimized for robustness against deletion of individual nodes or links. In this manner, large ensembles of functional networks with different kinds of robustness were obtained, making statistical investigations and comparison of their structural properties possible. We have found that, generally, different architectures are needed for various kinds of robustness. The differences are statistically revealed, for example, in the Laplacian spectra of the respective graphs. On the other hand, motif distributions of robust networks do not differ from those of the merely functional networks; they are found to belong to the first Alon superfamily, the same as that of the gene transcription networks of single-cell organisms.

[1]  Yoshiki Kuramoto,et al.  Robust network clocks: design of genetic oscillators as a complex combinatorial optimization problem. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  A. Mikhailov,et al.  Self-correcting networks: function, robustness, and motif distributions in biological signal processing. , 2008, Chaos.

[3]  Martin Vingron,et al.  Design and statistical properties of robust functional networks: a model study of biological signal transduction. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Alexander S Mikhailov,et al.  Design of easily synchronizable oscillator networks using the Monte Carlo optimization method. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Kunihiko Kaneko,et al.  Networks of Interacting Machines – Production Organization in Complex Industrial Systems and Biological Cells , 2005 .

[6]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[7]  E. Raineri,et al.  Evolvability and hierarchy in rewired bacterial gene networks , 2008, Nature.

[8]  Alexander S. Mikhailov,et al.  Evolutionary design of functional networks robust against noise , 2007 .

[9]  M. Savageau,et al.  Parameter Sensitivity as a Criterion for Evaluating and Comparing the Performance of Biochemical Systems , 1971, Nature.

[10]  E. Ruppin,et al.  Multiple knockout analysis of genetic robustness in the yeast metabolic network , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[11]  K. Kaneko,et al.  Network Evolution of Body Plans , 2008, PloS one.

[12]  Alexander S. Mikhailov,et al.  Turing patterns in network-organized activator–inhibitor systems , 2008, 0807.1230.

[13]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Superfamilies of Evolved and Designed Networks , 2004, Science.

[14]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[15]  Alexander S. Mikhailov,et al.  Evolutionary design of oscillatory genetic networks , 2010 .