Iceberg ahead: On electronic government research and societal aging

Abstract More than ten years ago, Peterson (1999, p. 3) warned that “[g]lobal aging, like a massive iceberg, looms ahead.” Government budgets have already been hit hard by a simultaneous increase in governmental spending and a decline in tax revenue related to a growing share of the elderly to the total population. While almost all industrialized countries can expect an aging population and resulting budget stress, the implications of the graying of society for a “graying of e-Government initiatives and budgets” are not readily apparent and therefore constitutes a subject worthy of investigation. Despite the increasing importance of this issue for e-Government in practice, there remains a clear need to assess our understanding and reflection of the phenomenon. Therefore, we examine (a) whether e-Government research presently provides adequate theory, vocabulary, and methods and (b) the extent to which future e-Government research is potentially able to contribute to tackling the substantial theoretical and practical challenges related to societal aging. Accordingly, we pursue a multi-method approach in terms of sequentially applying a retro spective literature review (12 journals, vol. 2000–2009) and a pro spective Delphi study (involving 24 e-Government experts). The results suggest that there is currently a significant gap between actual and potential e-Government research on societal aging. We discuss the implications for future e-Government research and describe potentially fruitful ways of bridging the prevailing gap between theory and practice.

[1]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Reconciling user and project manager perceptions of IT project risk: a Delphi study 1 , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[2]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Escalation and de‐escalation of commitment: a commitment transformation analysis of an e‐government project , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[3]  Jyoti Choudrie,et al.  Realising e-government in the UK: rural and urban challenges , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[4]  Yu-Che Chen,et al.  E-Government for Current and Future Senior Citizens , 2009 .

[5]  Cene Bavec,et al.  On stimulus for citizens’ use of e-government services , 2008, 2008 International Multiconference on Computer Science and Information Technology.

[6]  J. J. Po-An Hsieh,et al.  ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University , 2016 .

[7]  Henry M. Kim,et al.  How to compare and analyse risks of internet voting versus other modes of voting , 2006, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[8]  Roy C. Schmidt,et al.  MANAGING DELPHI SURVEYS USING NONPARAMETRIC STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES , 1997 .

[9]  Peter G. Peterson Gray Dawn: How the Coming Age Wave Will Transform America--and the World , 2000 .

[10]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  The ethical problem of framing e-government in terms of e-commerce. , 2005 .

[11]  Georg Aichholzer,et al.  Scenarios of e-Government in 2010 and implications for strategy design , 2010 .

[12]  Yan Li,et al.  Senior Citizens' Acceptance of Information Systems: A Study in the Context of e-Government Services , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[13]  Omiros D. Sarikas,et al.  Realising integrated e‐government services: a UK local government perspective , 2007 .

[14]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  The post mortem paradox: a Delphi study of IT specialist perceptions , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[15]  W. Martin,et al.  Implementing e-government: widening the lens , 2003 .

[16]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[17]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  Handbook of Research on Strategies for Local E-Government Adoption and Implementation: Comparative Studies , 2009 .

[18]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[19]  Timothy A. Nichols,et al.  How Old are your Participants? , 2001 .

[20]  Bartosz Przywara,et al.  The Economic Impact of Ageing Populations in the Eu25 Member States , 2005 .

[21]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[22]  Leela Damodaran,et al.  Citizen Participation and engagement in the Design of e-Government Services: The Missing Link in Effective ICT Design and Delivery , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[23]  George Wright,et al.  The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis , 1999 .

[24]  Elizabeth M. Daniel,et al.  The future of inter-organisational system linkages: findings of an international Delphi study , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Scenario building for E-Government in 2020: Consolidating the results from regional workshops , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[26]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  User-centered e-government: Challenges and benefits for government Web sites , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[27]  Kate S. Hone,et al.  Accessing e-Government Services: Design Requirements for the Older User , 2007, HCI.

[28]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Factors affecting consumers' behavioural intention to adopt broadband in Pakistan , 2007 .

[29]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Interorganizational information integration: A key enabler for digital government , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[30]  Roberts Alasdair,et al.  In the Eye of the Storm? Societal Aging and the Future of Public‐Service Reform , 2003 .

[31]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Guest editorial: From implementation to adoption: Challenges to successful E-Government diffusion , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[32]  Ralf Klischewski,et al.  E-Government Integration and Interoperability: Framing the Research Agenda , 2007 .

[33]  Leiser Silva,et al.  Fighting Against Windmills: Strategic Information Systems and Organizational Deep Structures , 2007, MIS Q..

[34]  Bo Xie,et al.  Civic Engagement Among Older Chinese Internet Users , 2008 .

[35]  John A. Shuler Policy implications of a model public information service: the DOSFAN experience , 2000, Gov. Inf. Q..

[36]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  Critically classifying: UK e‐government website benchmarking and the recasting of the citizen as customer , 2009, Inf. Syst. J..

[37]  J. Palfrey,et al.  Born digital: understanding the first generation of digital natives , 2009, Choice Reviews Online.

[38]  John Carlo Bertot,et al.  The E-Government paradox: Better customer service doesn't necessarily cost less , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[39]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Designing accessible technology , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[40]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  The Age-Divide in E-Government - Data, Interpretations, Theory Fragments , 2008, II3E.

[41]  Rachel S. Franklin Domestic Migration across Regions, Divisions, and States: 1995 to 2000 , 2003 .

[42]  Stephen Woods,et al.  Evaluating population estimates in the United States: Counting the population between the censuses , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[43]  Charles Mayo,et al.  Legislators and constituents: Examining demographics and online communication tools , 2008, Inf. Polity.

[44]  Shirley Ann Becker,et al.  E-government usability for older adults , 2005, CACM.

[45]  Michael Parent,et al.  Building Citizen Trust Through E-government , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[46]  Alan F. Newell,et al.  Methodologies for Involving Older Adults in the Design Process , 2007, HCI.

[47]  Ian Sommerville,et al.  Software Co-design with Older People , 2006 .

[48]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e‐government at the municipal level * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[49]  Stephen H. Holden,et al.  Distribution channel management in e-government: Addressing federal information policy issues , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[50]  Dudley L. Poston,et al.  Handbook of Population , 2005 .

[51]  Allen S. Lee Rigor and relevance in MIS research: beyond the approach of positivism alone , 1999 .

[52]  Stuart W. Shulman,et al.  E-Political Empowerment , 2005 .

[53]  Philip M. Hauser,et al.  The Study of Population. , 1959 .

[54]  Jean-Loup Chappelet,et al.  The appropriation of e-mail and the Internet by members of the Swiss Parliament , 2004, Inf. Polity.

[55]  I. Placencia-Porrero,et al.  The information society in demographically changing Europe , 2007 .

[56]  Paul D Jeanne Ellis Ormrod Leedy,et al.  Practical Research: Planning and Design , 1974 .

[57]  Fred D. Davis A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems : theory and results , 1985 .

[58]  Z. Fang E-Government in Digital Era: Concept, Practice, and Development , 2002 .

[59]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[60]  V. Weerakkody,et al.  Exploring E-Government in the UK: Challenges, Issues and Complexities , 2005 .

[61]  Benoît Otjacques,et al.  Interoperability of E-Government Information Systems: Issues of Identification and Data Sharing , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Demographic influence on UK citizens' e-government adoption , 2008, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[63]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Creating social entrepreneurship in local government , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[64]  Zoe S. Dimitriades,et al.  Internal service climate and psychological empowerment among public employees , 2007 .

[65]  G. C. Stewart,et al.  Inventory and Appraisal , 1958 .

[66]  Jyoti Choudrie,et al.  Using diffusion theory to determine the digital divide in e-services: two UK local-area perspectives , 2007, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[67]  R B Hudson,et al.  The "graying" of the federal budget and its consequences for old-age policy. , 1978, The Gerontologist.

[68]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Evaluating e‐government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[69]  Shirley Ann Becker,et al.  Architectural accessibility and reading complexity of US state e-government for older adult users , 2004, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[70]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Identifying Software Project Risks: An International Delphi Study , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[71]  Wolfgang E. Ebbers,et al.  Electronic government: Rethinking channel management strategies , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[72]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  When Subordinates Become IT Contractors: Persistent Managerial Expectations in IT Outsourcing , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[73]  Estelle James,et al.  Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth , 1994 .

[74]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  Research-derived web design guidelines for older people , 2005, Assets '05.

[75]  M. Oya,et al.  Towards Sustainable Society on Ubiquitous Networks , 2008 .

[76]  Björn Niehaves,et al.  The Demographic Challenge: Aging and Depopulation and their Consequences for eGovernment. , 2009 .

[77]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[78]  M. Adler,et al.  Gazing into the oracle : the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health , 1996 .

[79]  Harris Cooper,et al.  Scientific Guidelines for Conducting Integrative Research Reviews , 1982 .

[80]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[81]  Stuart W. Shulman,et al.  Generational Differences in Information Technology Use and Political Involvement , 2006, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[82]  Lynette Kvasny,et al.  The challenges of redressing the digital divide: a tale of two US cities , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[83]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Understanding e-Government project trajectories from an actor-network perspective , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..