Bridging the symmetry-related gap between physical and digital sculpting by application of reverse engineering modeling

Nowadays 3D technologies are integrated into all aspects of modern lives. This integration of 3D technologies paved new paths for further expansion of other fields, most recently the field of arts. In this paper bridging the symmetry-related gap between physical and digital sculpting by application of reverse engineering modeling was presented. This approach enables artists to express their art in physical 3D object form and then transfer it into a digital world in order to satisfy various prerequisites (here, the final 3D model is to be ideally symmetrical). In order to describe this process, one case study is selected. With the use of close-range photogrammetry based on structure from motion, as a 3D digitization technique, a physical 3D model of a human head manually sculpted in clay was digitized. In order to obtain a final physical or digital 3D model of sculpted head and to make it symmetrical, the symmetry analysis and correction was performed. Namely, by comparing digitized 3D model with its idealized 3D model (that was created based on symmetry-correction), symmetry analysis was carried out using computer-aided inspection. The results showed critical regions of the physical i.e. its digitized 3D model that, because of having no acceptable levels of dimensional deviations (regarding ideal symmetry), it must be corrected/minimized. This can be performed either by manual re-sculpting of the physical 3D model, or by modification of digitized 3D model (if there is no intention to use idealized 3D model for subsequent CNC-fabrication as an example).

[1]  Bridgette Mongeon,et al.  Digital Sculpting with Mudbox: Essential Tools and Techniques for Artists , 2010 .

[2]  Djordje Vukelic,et al.  Comparative analysis on measuring performances of dental intraoral and extraoral optical 3D digitization systems , 2014 .

[3]  Filiberto Chiabrando,et al.  Recent trends in cultural heritage 3D survey: The photogrammetric computer vision approach , 2018, Journal of Cultural Heritage.

[4]  Andreas Koschan,et al.  Methodologies and Techniques for Reverse Engineering–The Potential for Automation with 3-D Laser Scanners , 2008 .

[5]  Jack Burnham,et al.  Beyond Modern Sculpture , 1969 .

[6]  Hongbin Zha,et al.  3D Digitization and Its Applications in Cultural Heritage , 2010, EuroMed.

[7]  Richard J. Bibb,et al.  Medical Modelling: The Application of Advanced Design and Rapid Prototyping Techniques in Medicine (Woodhead Publishing Series in Biomaterials) , 2014 .

[8]  George Pavlidis,et al.  Multi-image 3D reconstruction data evaluation , 2014 .

[9]  Ertu Unver,et al.  Digital sculpting for historical representation: Neville tomb case study , 2017, Digit. Creativity.

[10]  Enrico Savio,et al.  Metrology of freeform shaped parts , 2007 .

[11]  Bing Yang,et al.  Applications of structure from motion: a survey , 2013, Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE C.

[12]  Mirko Soković,et al.  Reconstruction of 3D models of cast sculptures using close-range photogrammetry , 2015 .

[13]  Mico Stanojevic,et al.  Implementation of FEM and rapid prototyping in maxillofacial surgery , 2016 .

[14]  Fabio Menna,et al.  Photogrammetry applied to Problematic artefacts , 2014 .

[15]  George Pavlidis,et al.  Methods for 3D digitization of Cultural Heritage , 2007 .

[16]  Richard J. Bibb,et al.  Medical Modelling : The Application of Advanced Design and Rapid Prototyping Techniques in Medicine Ed. 2 , 2014 .

[17]  Mico Stanojevic,et al.  Comparing the accuracy of professional and consumer grade 3D printers in complex models production , 2017 .

[18]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Modeling the World from Internet Photo Collections , 2008, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[19]  Andreas Koschan,et al.  3D CAD model generation of mechanical parts using coded‐pattern projection and laser triangulation systems , 2005 .

[20]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty , 1998 .