Tidal networks: 1. Automatic network extraction and preliminary scaling features from digital terrain maps

We propose a method of automatic extraction of the tidal channel network from topographic data of marsh and tidal flat lands that uses a combination of a threshold elevation and threshold curvature. Not only the location but also the area of the channel bed is identified. This method differs substantially from that used to identify terrestrial channel networks, and it successfully predicts all of the main channels and nearly all of the smaller tributaries of the channel networks derived from SPOT imagery of the northern Venice Lagoon. Channel network maps of Venice and other sites (Petaluma Marsh in the San Francisco Bay and Barnstable Marsh in Massachusetts) were examined for scaling properties. Because of the large width of the channels relative to a characteristic length of their drainage area, we had to develop procedures for automatically delineating channel width and then for identifying the skeleton of the channel network (the pattern connecting the loci of the channel centerlines) for box‐counting analysis. Box‐counting dimensions of the network skeleton proved site‐dependent and showed finite‐size effects. Because of the large widths we also performed a scaling analysis based on the proportions of the total channel bed area occupied by the tidal networks (i.e., a “fat” fractal analysis). This analysis showed a strong break in scaling between large and small channels. These analyses suggest that tidal channels differ significantly in their scaling relationships from terrestrial systems. In subsequent papers [Rinaldo et al., this issue (a), (b)] we pursue this point much further.

[1]  R. Horton.  EROSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF STREAMS AND THEIR DRAINAGE BASINS; HYDROPHYSICAL APPROACH TO QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY , 1945 .

[2]  L. B. Leopold,et al.  The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications , 1953 .

[3]  L. V. Straaten.  Composition and structure of recent marine sediments in the Netherlands , 1954 .

[4]  V. J. Chapman,et al.  Salt Marshes and Salt Deserts of the World. , 1960 .

[5]  V. J. Chapman,et al.  Salt Marshes and Salt Deserts of the World , 1962 .

[6]  Luna Bergere Leopold,et al.  Hydraulic geometry of a small tidal estuary , 1963 .

[7]  J. Dronkers,et al.  Tidal computations in rivers and coastal waters , 1964 .

[8]  R. Pestrong.  The development of drainage patterns on tidal marshes , 1965 .

[9]  Alfred C. Redfield,et al.  Development of a New England Salt Marsh , 1972 .

[10]  J. Boon.  Tidal discharge asymmetry in a salt marsh drainage system1,2 , 1975 .

[11]  M. Leeder,et al.  Sedimentary model for intertidal mudflat channels, with examples from the Solway Firth, Scotland , 1976 .

[12]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[13]  T. Spencer,et al.  Tidal Flows in Salt Marsh Creeks , 1979 .

[14]  R. Healey,et al.  Velocity variations in salt marsh creeks, Norfolk, England , 1981 .

[15]  L. B. Leopold,et al.  Channel and flow relationships in tidal salt marsh wetlands , 1984 .

[16]  P. Blondeaux,et al.  A unified bar–bend theory of river meanders , 1985, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Celso Grebogi,et al.  Exterior dimension of fat fractals , 1985 .

[18]  Relating the various scaling exponents used to characterize fat fractals in nonlinear dynamical systems , 1988 .

[19]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Where do channels begin? , 1988, Nature.

[20]  H. A. Jacobson.  Historical development of the saltmarsh at Wells, Maine , 1988 .

[21]  G. Ashley,et al.  Tidal channel classification for a low-mesotidal salt marsh , 1988 .

[22]  V. Nikora.  Fractal structures of river plan forms , 1991 .

[23]  Extension of the fat-fractal exponent β to arbitrary sets in D dimensions , 1992 .

[24]  J. French,et al.  Hydrodynamics of salt marsh creek systems: Implications for marsh morphological development and material exchange , 1992 .

[25]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Channel Initiation and the Problem of Landscape Scale , 1992, Science.

[26]  B. Troutman,et al.  Fat fractal scaling of drainage networks from a random spatial network model , 1992 .

[27]  Colin D. Woodroffe,et al.  The evolution of tidal creek networks, mary river, northern Australia , 1992 .

[28]  L. B. Leopold,et al.  Hydrology of some tidal channels in estuarine marshland near San Francisco , 1993 .

[29]  Denis Allard.  On the Connectivity of Two Random Set Models: The Truncated Gaussian and the Boolean , 1993 .

[30]  E. Foufoula‐Georgiou,et al.  Channel network source representation using digital elevation models , 1993 .

[31]  J. Kirchner.  Statistical inevitability of Horton's laws and the apparent randomness of stream channel networks , 1993 .

[32]  A. Howard.  A detachment-limited model of drainage basin evolution , 1994 .

[33]  R. Grossinger.  Historical Evidence of Freshwater Effects on the Plan Form of Tidal Marshlands in the Golden Gate Estuary , 1995 .

[34]  Henry F. Lamb,et al.  Geomorphic change of saltmarsh tidal creek networks in the Dyfi Estuary, Wales , 1995 .

[35]  B. S. Daya Sagar,et al.  Fractal relation of a morphological skeleton , 1996 .

[36]  Nicholas J. Clifford,et al.  Classics in physical geography revisited , 1996 .

[37]  M. Lapointe,et al.  DOWNVALLEY GRADIENTS IN FLOW PATTERNS, SEDIMENT TRANSPORT AND CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY IN A SMALL MACROTIDAL ESTUARY: DIPPER HARBOUR CREEK, NEW BRUNSWICK, CANADA , 1996 .

[38]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-Organization , 1997 .

[39]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  Tidal networks: 3. Landscape‐forming discharges and studies in empirical geomorphic relationships , 1999 .

[40]  A. Rinaldo,et al.  Tidal networks: 2. Watershed delineation and comparative network morphology , 1999 .