Gradient semi-interpenetrating polymer networks based on polyurethane and poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) for biomedical applications

Gradient semi-interpenetrating polymer networks (gradient semi-IPNs) as well as the traditional semi-interpenetrating polymer networks (semi-IPNs) were synthesized using polyurethane (PU) and poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA). The materials were characterized with respect to thermodynamic miscibility, NIR imaging, mechanical properties and morphological structure by tapping mode atomic force microscopy (TM AFM). The positive values of Gibbs free energy indicated that polymeric systems were thermodynamically immiscible. The dynamic mechanical analysis as well as TM AFM demonstrated that the systems under investigation were two-phase systems with incomplete phase separation. The gradient semi-IPNs were shown to have unique mechanical properties dependent on the composition and on the degree of microphase separation. The ability to create a layer of biocompatible polymer, such as PHEMA, at the surface, or create nanostructured surface consisting of nanodomains of different polymeric compositions, and engineer the improvements in the mechanical properties of the materials through the use of gradient systems should allow the creation of novel materials for biomedical application through the optimisation of mechanical properties, surface chemistry and biological properties.

[1]  Y. Lipatov,et al.  Gradient interpenetrating polymer networks , 1995 .

[2]  P. Lebaudy,et al.  Gradient structure materials from homogeneous system induced by UV photopolymerization , 2003 .

[3]  Weimin Cai,et al.  Damping properties and morphology of polyurethane/vinyl ester resin interpenetrating polymer network , 2004 .

[4]  R. J. Thoma Poly(ether) Urethane Reactivity with Metal-Ion in Calcification and Environmental Stress Cracking , 1986, Journal of biomaterials applications.

[5]  G. Boiteux,et al.  Polyurethane/poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) semi-interpenetrating polymer networks for biomedical applications , 2006, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[6]  G. Boiteux,et al.  Miscibility and thermal and dynamic mechanical behaviour of semi‐interpenetrating polymer networks based on polyurethane and poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) , 2004 .

[7]  G. Boiteux,et al.  Gradient semi-interpenetrating polymer networks based on polyurethane and poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) , 2005 .

[8]  L. Karabanova,et al.  Temperature transitions and compatibility in gradient interpenetrating polymer networks , 1992 .

[9]  Q. Tran‐Cong‐Miyata,et al.  Interpenetrating Polymer Networks with Spatially Graded Morphology Controllable by UV‐Radiation Curing , 2006 .

[10]  L. Karabanova,et al.  Thermodynamic state, temperature transitions, and broadband dielectric relaxation behavior in gradient interpenetrating polymer networks , 1998 .

[11]  S. Armes,et al.  Well-defined sulfobetaine-based statistical copolymers as potential antibioadherent coatings. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[12]  Moon Suk Kim,et al.  Gradient polymer surfaces for biomedical applications , 2008 .

[13]  Fabrication and mechanical properties of glass fibre–carbon fibre polypropylene functionally gradient materials , 1998 .

[14]  Simulation of conversion profiles within dimethacrylate thick material during photopolymerization. Validation of the simulation by thermal analysis data. Application to the synthesis of a gradient structure material , 2006 .

[15]  G. Martin,et al.  Mechanical behavior of gradient polymers , 1981 .

[16]  A. Lloyd,et al.  Ocular biomaterials and implants. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[17]  L. Karabanova,et al.  Gradient Semiinterpenetrating Polymer Networks Based on Polyurethane and Polyvinylpyrrolidone , 2002 .

[18]  M. Kryszewski Gradient polymers and copolymers , 1998 .