Localization and Speech-Identification Ability of Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using Phase-Preserving Amplification

Objective: The purpose of these experiments was to determine the ability of hearing-impaired listeners to localize and to identify speech in noise using phase-preserving and non–phase-preserving amplification. Design: These abilities were measured 4 times over each of two 16-week periods, using a randomized, single-blinded, within-subject crossover design. Listeners were fitted bilaterally, using the National Acoustic Laboratories linear frequency-gain characteristic with a digital hearing aid programmed in one of two ways: (1) with a linear-phase filter and (2) with filters designed to compensate for the magnitude and phase anomalies caused by the hearing aid fitting, thus preserving interaural phase. Listeners identified a word and its location in background noise with a speech-shaped spectrum. Results: Immediately after fitting, both hearing aid programs reduced the listeners' ability to localize the speech in noise. The phase-preserving processing had a less detrimental effect on localization ability immediately after fitting. After 3 weeks, performance improved such that, for localization in noise, there was no detrimental effect of amplification and no difference between the two processing strategies. Over 16 weeks, speech understanding in noise improved. Speech understanding for phase-preserving processing was slightly and significantly better than linear-phase processing at 16 weeks. Conclusions: Localization ability using phase-preserving amplification does not differ from localization ability using traditional non–phase-preserving amplification after just 3 weeks of use. Listeners quickly acclimated to altered spatial cues. Phase-preserving amplification provided a 2.3% advantage for speech intelligibility in noise after 16 weeks.

[1]  D. M. Green,et al.  Sound localization by human listeners. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  J. C. R. Licklider,et al.  The Influence of Interaural Phase Relations upon the Masking of Speech by White Noise , 1948 .

[3]  S Gatehouse,et al.  The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  H S Colburn,et al.  Binaural interaction of impaired listeners. A review of past research. , 1981, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[5]  H S Colburn,et al.  Frequency dependence of binaural performance in listeners with impaired binaural hearing. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  F L Wightman,et al.  Interaural time discrimination ability of listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1980, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[7]  Paul M. Hofman,et al.  Relearning sound localization with new ears , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  H Levitt,et al.  A cancellation technique for the amplitude and phase calibration of hearing aids and nonconventional transducers. , 1987, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[9]  W Noble,et al.  Auditory localization under conditions of unilateral fitting of different hearing aid systems. , 1991, British journal of audiology.

[10]  M P Haggard,et al.  The four alternative auditory feature test (FAAF)--linguistic and psychometric properties of the material with normative data in noise. , 1987, British journal of audiology.

[11]  C. Lorenzi,et al.  Sound localization in noise in normal-hearing listeners. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Earl D. Schubert,et al.  Some Preliminary Experiments on Binaural Time Delay and Intelligibility , 1956 .

[13]  F. Wightman,et al.  The dominant role of low-frequency interaural time differences in sound localization. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Sam Glucksberg,et al.  Noise Localization after Unilateral Attenuation , 1966 .

[15]  L. Jongkees,et al.  Directional hearing capacity in hearing disorders. , 1957, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[16]  Ira J. Hirsh,et al.  The Relation between Localization and Intelligibility , 1950 .

[17]  S Gatehouse,et al.  Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection of frequency responses for hearing aids. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[18]  W. Noble,et al.  The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[19]  W. Noble,et al.  Auditory localization, detection of spatial separateness, and speech hearing in noise by hearing impaired listeners. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Stuart Gatehouse,et al.  Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap , 2004, International Journal of Audiology.

[21]  G Lidén,et al.  Sound localization with phase audiometry. , 1976, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[22]  W. Noble,et al.  Effects on sound localization of configuration and type of hearing impairment. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  William Noble,et al.  Hearing speech against spatially separate competing speech versus competing noise , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  H S Colburn,et al.  Effects of Reference Interaural Time and Intensity Differences on Binaural Performance in Listeners with Normal and Impaired Hearing , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[25]  John F. Culling,et al.  Effects of simulated reverberation on the use of binaural cues and fundamental-frequency differences for separating concurrent vowels , 1994, Speech Commun..

[26]  C. Lorenzi,et al.  Sound localization in noise in hearing-impaired listeners. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  N I Durlach,et al.  Adapting to supernormal auditory localization cues. I. Bias and resolution. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  W Noble,et al.  A comparison of different binaural hearing aid systems for sound localization in the horizontal and vertical planes. , 1990, British journal of audiology.

[29]  C Trahiotis,et al.  Discrimination of interaural temporal disparities by normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  S D Stephens,et al.  The use of an open-ended problems questionnaire in auditory rehabilitation. , 1980, British journal of audiology.

[31]  J. Koehnke,et al.  Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on interaural discrimination and virtual localization. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  H. Dillon,et al.  The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[33]  Jayne B Ahlstrom,et al.  Spectral contributions to the benefit from spatial separation of speech and noise. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[34]  D. Byrne,et al.  Effects of long-term bilateral and unilateral fitting of different hearing aid types on the ability to locate sounds. , 1992, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.