This is a follow-on study to a 2010 correlation effort. Measured data from the SMART rotor test in the NASA Ames 40- by 80- Foot Wind Tunnel are compared with CAMRAD II calculations. As background, during the wind tunnel test, unexpectedly high inboard loads were encountered, and it was hypothesized at that time that due to changes in the flexbeams over the years, the flexbeam properties used in the analysis needed updating. Boeing Mesa, recently updated these properties. This correlation study uses the updated flexbeam properties. Compared to earlier studies, the following two enhancements are implemented: i) the inboard loads (pitchcase and flexbeam loads) correlation is included for the first time (reliable prediction of the inboard loads is a prerequisite for any future anticipated flight-testing); ii) the number of blade modes is increased to better capture the flap dynamics and the pitchcase-flexbeam dynamics. Also, aerodynamically, both the rolled-up wake model and the more complex, multiple trailer wake model are used, with the latter slightly improving the blade chordwise moment correlation. This sensitivity to the wake model indicates that CFD is needed. Three high-speed experimental cases, one uncontrolled free flap case and two commanded flap cases, are considered. The two commanded flap cases include a 2o flap deflection at 5P case and a 0o flap deflection case. For the free flap case, selected modifications to the HH-06 section flap airfoil pitching moment table are implemented. For the commanded 2o flap case, the experimental flap variation is approximately matched by increasing the analytical flap hinge stiffness. This increased flap hinge stiffness is retained for the commanded 0o flap case also, which is treated as a free flap case, but with larger flap hinge stiffness. The change in the mid-span and outboard loads correlation due to the updating of the flexbeam properties is not significant. Increasing the number of blade modes results in an effective, commanded flap hinge stiffness of 4X baseline, not 3X as reported earlier. The inboard loads correlation is reasonable, but needs further study. Overall, the free flap case correlation is reasonable, thus confirming the basic correctness of the current semi-empirical modifications; the correlation for the commanded 2o flap at 5P case and the 0o flap case is also reasonable.
[1]
Friedrich K. Straub,et al.
Active Flap Control of the SMART Rotor for Vibration Reduction
,
2009
.
[2]
David Sigl,et al.
A General Free Wake Geometry Calculation for Wings and Rotors
,
1995
.
[3]
Sesi Kottapalli.
Calculation of Hub Loads at Low Airspeeds with Active Control
,
2007
.
[4]
McDonnell Douglas Helicopter Co.,et al.
A Full-Scale Test of the McDonnell Douglas Advanced Bearingless Rotor in the NASA Ames 40 x 80 Foot Wind Tunnel
,
1993
.
[5]
Stephen A. Jacklin,et al.
Full-Scale Wind Tunnel Test of the McDonnell Douglas Five- Bladed Advanced Bearingless Rotor: Performance, Stability, Loads, Control Power, Vibration and HHC Data
,
1994
.
[6]
Wayne Johnson,et al.
Technology Drivers in the Development of CAMRAD II
,
1999
.
[7]
Sesi Kottapalli,et al.
Correlation of SMART Active Flap Rotor Loads
,
2009
.
[8]
R. J. Murrill,et al.
Bearingless Main Rotor Whirl Test: Design, Analysis and Test Results
,
1993
.
[9]
Dan Lauzon,et al.
Aeroelastic Stability of the McDonnell Douglas Advanced Bearingless Rotor
,
1993
.
[10]
Sesi B. R. Kottapalli.
Low Speed and High Speed Correlation of SMART Active Flap Rotor Loads
,
2010
.
[11]
W. Johnson,et al.
CAMRAD - A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYTICAL MODEL OF ROTORCRAFT AERODYNAMICS AND DYNAMICS
,
1994
.