A Tandem Affinity Tag for Two-step Purification under Fully Denaturing Conditions

Tandem affinity strategies reach exceptional protein purification grades and have considerably improved the outcome of mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments. However, current tandem affinity tags are incompatible with two-step purification under fully denaturing conditions. Such stringent purification conditions are desirable for mass spectrometric analyses of protein modifications as they result in maximal preservation of posttranslational modifications. Here we describe the histidine-biotin (HB) tag, a new tandem affinity tag for two-step purification under denaturing conditions. The HB tag consists of a hexahistidine tag and a bacterially derived in vivo biotinylation signal peptide that induces efficient biotin attachment to the HB tag in yeast and mammalian cells. HB-tagged proteins can be sequentially purified under fully denaturing conditions, such as 8 m urea, by Ni2+ chelate chromatography and binding to streptavidin resins. The stringent separation conditions compatible with the HB tag prevent loss of protein modifications, and the high purification grade achieved by the tandem affinity strategy facilitates mass spectrometric analysis of posttranslational modifications. Ubiquitination is a particularly sensitive protein modification that is rapidly lost during purification under native conditions due to ubiquitin hydrolase activity. The HB tag is ideal to study ubiquitination because the denaturing conditions inhibit hydrolase activity, and the tandem affinity strategy greatly reduces nonspecific background. We tested the HB tag in proteome-wide ubiquitin profiling experiments in yeast and identified a number of known ubiquitinated proteins as well as so far unidentified candidate ubiquitination targets. In addition, the stringent purification conditions compatible with the HB tag allow effective mass spectrometric identification of in vivo cross-linked protein complexes, thereby expanding proteomic analyses to the description of weakly or transiently associated protein complexes.

[1]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry , 2002, Nature.

[2]  A. Chapman-Smith,et al.  The enzymatic biotinylation of proteins: a post-translational modification of exceptional specificity. , 1999, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[3]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  A subset of membrane-associated proteins is ubiquitinated in response to mutations in the endoplasmic reticulum degradation machinery , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Andrew Emili,et al.  Defining the SUMO-modified Proteome by Multiple Approaches in Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  John R Yates,et al.  Applicability of Tandem Affinity Purification MudPIT to Pathway Proteomics in Yeast*S , 2004, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[6]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Retroviruses and yeast retrotransposons use overlapping sets of host genes. , 2005, Genome research.

[7]  J. Yates,et al.  Implication of a novel multiprotein Dam1p complex in outer kinetochore function , 2001, The Journal of cell biology.

[8]  Raymond J. Deshaies,et al.  Skp1 forms multiple protein complexes, including RAVE, a regulator of V-ATPase assembly , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[9]  Lan Huang,et al.  Global approaches to understanding ubiquitination , 2005, Genome Biology.

[10]  Steven P. Gygi,et al.  Weighing in on ubiquitin: the expanding role of mass-spectrometry-based proteomics , 2005, Nature Cell Biology.

[11]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[12]  David C Schwartz,et al.  A superfamily of protein tags: ubiquitin, SUMO and related modifiers. , 2003, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[13]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2003, Nature.

[14]  J. Yates,et al.  Proteolysis-independent regulation of the transcription factor Met4 by a single Lys 48-linked ubiquitin chain , 2004, Nature Cell Biology.

[15]  Dario Neri,et al.  In vivo protein biotinylation for identification of organ-specific antigens accessible from the vasculature , 2005, Nature Methods.

[16]  S. Reed,et al.  Protein kinase activity associated with the product of the yeast cell division cycle gene CDC28. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  P. Philippsen,et al.  Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR‐based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Yeast.

[18]  P. Philippsen,et al.  Heterologous modules for efficient and versatile PCR‐based gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe , 1998, Yeast.

[19]  J. Yates.  Mass spectral analysis in proteomics. , 2004, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[20]  S. Reed,et al.  Regulation of Transcription by Ubiquitination without Proteolysis Cdc34/SCFMet30-Mediated Inactivation of the Transcription Factor Met4 , 2000, Cell.

[21]  M. Tyers,et al.  Dual regulation of the met4 transcription factor by ubiquitin-dependent degradation and inhibition of promoter recruitment. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[22]  Juergen Kast,et al.  Identification of protein‐protein interactions using in vivo cross‐linking and mass spectrometry , 2004, Proteomics.

[23]  Lan Huang,et al.  An Integrated Mass Spectrometry‐Based Proteomics Approach‐QTAX to Decipher the 26S Proteasome Interacting Network , 2006 .

[24]  Thibault Mayor,et al.  Analysis of Polyubiquitin Conjugates Reveals That the Rpn10 Substrate Receptor Contributes to the Turnover of Multiple Proteasome Targets*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[25]  R. D. Gietz,et al.  New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. , 1988, Gene.

[26]  B. Séraphin,et al.  A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  R. Mayer,et al.  Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins as multifunctional signals , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[28]  Peter R. Baker,et al.  Comprehensive Analysis of a Multidimensional Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrometry Dataset Acquired on a Quadrupole Selecting, Quadrupole Collision Cell, Time-of-flight Mass Spectrometer , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[29]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  Proteomic insights into ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins. , 2005, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[30]  J. Cronan.  Biotination of proteins in vivo. A post-translational modification to label, purify, and study proteins. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[31]  Lan Huang,et al.  An Integrated Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomic Approach , 2006, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[32]  Toshihide Nishimura,et al.  Large‐scale analysis of the human ubiquitin‐related proteome , 2005, Proteomics.

[33]  Steven P. Gygi,et al.  A Proteomic Strategy for Gaining Insights into Protein Sumoylation in Yeast*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[34]  Gerald R. Fink,et al.  Guide to yeast genetics and molecular biology , 1993 .

[35]  F. Tamanoi,et al.  A tagging-via-substrate technology for detection and proteomics of farnesylated proteins. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Clifford Odets Papers.  Guide to the , 2003 .

[37]  Steven P Gygi,et al.  A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[38]  Raymond J. Deshaies,et al.  Function and regulation of cullin–RING ubiquitin ligases , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[39]  B. Séraphin,et al.  The tandem affinity purification (TAP) method: a general procedure of protein complex purification. , 2001, Methods.

[40]  M. Osley,et al.  Rad6-dependent ubiquitination of histone H2B in yeast. , 2000, Science.