Bayesian collocation tempering and generalized profiling for estimation of parameters from differential equation models

The widespread use of ordinary differential equation (ODE) models has long been underrepresented in the statistical literature. The most common methods for estimating parameters from ODE models are nonlinear least squares and an MCMC based method. Both of these methods depend on a likelihood involving the numerical solution to the ODE. The challenge faced by these methods is parameter spaces that are difficult to navigate, exacerbated by the wide variety of behaviours that a single ODE model can produce with respect to small changes in parameter values.%%%%In this work, two competing methods, generalized profile estimation and Bayesian collocation tempering are described. Both of these methods use a basis expansion to approximate the ODE solution in the likelihood, where the shape of the basis expansion, or data smooth, is guided by the ODE model. This approximation to the ODE, smooths out the likelihood surface, reducing restrictions on parameter movement.%%%%Generalized Profile Estimation maximizes the profile likelihood for the ODE parameters while profiling out the basis coefficients of the data smooth. The smoothing parameter determines the balance between fitting the data and the ODE model, and consequently is used to build a parameter cascade, reducing the dimension of the estimation problem. Generalized profile estimation is described with under a constraint to ensure the smooth follows known behaviour such as monotonicity or non-negativity.%%%%Bayesian collocation tempering, uses a sequence posterior densities with smooth approximations to the ODE solution. The level of the approximation is determined by the value of the smoothing parameter, which also determines the level of smoothness in the likelihood surface. In an algorithm similar to parallel tempering, parallel MCMC chains are run to sample from the sequence of posterior densities, while allowing ODE parameters to swap between chains. This method is introduced and tested against a variety of alternative Bayesian models, in terms of posterior variance and rate of convergence.%%%%The performance of generalized profile estimation and Bayesian collocation tempering are tested and compared using simulated data sets from the FitzHugh-Nagumo ODE system and real data from nylon production dynamics.

[1]  Michael Dowd,et al.  Bayesian statistical data assimilation for ecosystem models using Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 2007 .

[2]  Jiguo Cao,et al.  Parameter cascades and profiling in functional data analysis , 2007, Comput. Stat..

[3]  Elizabeth L. Scott,et al.  Consistent Estimates Based on Partially Consistent Observations Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[4]  Jiguo Cao,et al.  Parameter estimation for differential equations: a generalized smoothing approach , 2007 .

[5]  E L Ionides,et al.  Inference for nonlinear dynamical systems , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Hulin Wu,et al.  A Bayesian approach for estimating antiviral efficacy in HIV dynamic models , 2006 .

[7]  Ya I Molkov,et al.  Modified Bayesian approach for the reconstruction of dynamical systems from time series. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  S. Kou,et al.  Equi-energy sampler with applications in statistical inference and statistical mechanics , 2005, math/0507080.

[9]  Jiguo Cao Generalized profiling method and the applications to adaptive penalized smoothing, generalized semiparametric additive models and estimating differential equations , 2006 .

[10]  Wei Zheng,et al.  Effects of End-Group Balance on Melt-Phase Nylon 612 Polycondensation: Experimental Study and Mathematical Model , 2005 .

[11]  Lorenz T. Biegler,et al.  A Trust Region SQP Algorithm for Equality Constrained Parameter Estimation with Simple Parameter Bounds , 2004, Comput. Optim. Appl..

[12]  B. Ripley,et al.  Robust Statistics , 2018, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences.

[13]  K. McAuley,et al.  Experimental Study and Modeling of Nylon Polycondensation in the Melt Phase , 2003 .

[14]  Kevin Judd,et al.  Chaotic-time-series reconstruction by the Bayesian paradigm: right results by wrong methods. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[15]  Scott M. Berry,et al.  Bayesian Smoothing and Regression Splines for Measurement Error Problems , 2002 .

[16]  A. Raftery,et al.  Inference for Deterministic Simulation Models: The Bayesian Melding Approach , 2000 .

[17]  Meyer,et al.  Bayesian reconstruction of chaotic dynamical systems , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[18]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  Deterministic Global Optimization in Nonlinear Optimal Control Problems , 2000, J. Glob. Optim..

[19]  James O. Ramsay,et al.  Penalized regression with model‐based penalties , 2000 .

[20]  H. Wilson Spikes, Decisions, and Actions: The Dynamical Foundations of Neuroscience , 1999 .

[21]  Jun S. Liu,et al.  Simulated Sintering: Markov Chain Monte Carlo With Spaces of Varying Dimensions , 2007 .

[22]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Bayesian Backfitting , 1998 .

[23]  A. Gelman,et al.  Physiological Pharmacokinetic Analysis Using Population Modeling and Informative Prior Distributions , 1996 .

[24]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[25]  G. Parisi,et al.  Simulated tempering: a new Monte Carlo scheme , 1992, hep-lat/9205018.

[26]  P. Brockwell,et al.  Time Series: Theory and Methods , 2013 .

[27]  C. Geyer Markov Chain Monte Carlo Maximum Likelihood , 1991 .

[28]  Douglas M. Bates,et al.  Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications , 1988 .

[29]  J. Varah A Spline Least Squares Method for Numerical Parameter Estimation in Differential Equations , 1982 .

[30]  J. Neyman,et al.  Consistent Estimates Based on Partially Consistent Observations , 1948 .

[31]  C. Elton,et al.  The Ten-Year Cycle in Numbers of the Lynx in Canada , 1942 .