Targeted chemical wedges reveal the role of allosteric DNA modulation in protein-DNA assembly.

The cooperative assembly of multiprotein complexes results from allosteric modulations of DNA structure as well as direct intermolecular contacts between proteins. Such cooperative binding plays a critical role in imparting exquisite sequence specificity on the homeobox transcription factor (Hox) family of developmental transcription factors. A well-characterized example includes the interaction of Hox proteins with extradenticle (Exd), a highly conserved DNA binding transcription factor. Although direct interactions are important, the contribution of indirect interactions toward cooperative assembly of Hox and Exd remains unresolved. Here we use minor groove binding polyamides as structural wedges to induce perturbations at specific base steps within the Exd binding site. We find that allosteric modulation of DNA structure contributes nearly 1.5 kcal/mol to the binding of Exd to DNA, even in the absence of direct Hox contacts. In contrast to previous studies, the sequence-targeted chemical wedges reveal the role of DNA geometry in cooperative assembly of Hox-Exd complexes. Programmable polyamides may well serve as general probes to investigate the role of DNA modulation in the cooperative and highly specific assembly of other protein-DNA complexes.

[1]  A. Brass,et al.  Crystal structure of PU.1/IRF-4/DNA ternary complex. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[2]  Evidence that a minor groove-binding peptide and a major groove-binding protein can simultaneously occupy a common site on DNA. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[3]  Bending in the right direction. , 2005, Structure.

[4]  T Marty,et al.  Regulation of Hox target genes by a DNA bound Homothorax/Hox/Extradenticle complex. , 1999, Development.

[5]  Jeffrey A. Lefstin,et al.  Allosteric effects of DNA on transcriptional regulators , 1998, Nature.

[6]  Irene K. Moore,et al.  A genomic code for nucleosome positioning , 2006, Nature.

[7]  S. Carroll,et al.  Hox repression of a target gene: extradenticle-independent, additive action through multiple monomer binding sites. , 2002, Development.

[8]  E. Wieschaus,et al.  Coordinate regulation of downstream genes by extradenticle and the homeotic selector proteins. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[9]  H. Saragovi,et al.  Residues Flanking the HOX YPWM Motif Contribute to Cooperative Interactions with PBX* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  P. Dervan,et al.  Toward artificial developmental regulators. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  P. Dervan,et al.  Recognition of the DNA minor groove by pyrrole-imidazole polyamides. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[12]  Christina M. Taylor,et al.  Allosteric inhibition of zinc-finger binding in the major groove of DNA by minor-groove binding ligands. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[13]  R. Mann,et al.  A structural model for a homeotic protein-extradenticle-DNA complex accounts for the choice of HOX protein in the heterodimer. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  M. Brenowitz,et al.  DNA structure and flexibility in the sequence-specific binding of papillomavirus E2 proteins. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  S. Carroll,et al.  Ultrabithorax regulates genes at several levels of the wing-patterning hierarchy to shape the development of the Drosophila haltere. , 1998, Genes & development.

[16]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational redesign of endonuclease DNA binding and cleavage specificity , 2006, Nature.

[17]  P. Dervan,et al.  Sequence specific fluorescence detection of double strand DNA. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  Aneel K. Aggarwal,et al.  Structure of a DNA-bound Ultrabithorax–Extradenticle homeodomain complex , 1999, Nature.

[19]  S. Harrison,et al.  An Atomic Model of the Interferon-β Enhanceosome , 2007, Cell.

[20]  Christopher L. Warren,et al.  Defining the sequence-recognition profile of DNA-binding molecules. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Yongli Zhang,et al.  Predicting indirect readout effects in protein-DNA interactions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  R. Sauer,et al.  Transcription factors: structural families and principles of DNA recognition. , 1992, Annual review of biochemistry.

[23]  S. Harrison,et al.  DNA recognition by proteins with the helix-turn-helix motif. , 1990, Annual review of biochemistry.

[24]  P. Beachy.  A molecular view of the Ultrabithorax homeotic gene of Drosophila. , 1990, Trends in Genetics.

[25]  M. Cleary,et al.  Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA Role of the Hexapeptide and a Fourth Homeodomain Helix in Complex Formation , 1999, Cell.

[26]  R. Lavery,et al.  Measuring the geometry of DNA grooves , 1994, Biopolymers.

[27]  R Lavery,et al.  The definition of generalized helicoidal parameters and of axis curvature for irregular nucleic acids. , 1988, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[28]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Changing the binding specificity of a represser by redesigning an α-helix , 1985, Nature.

[29]  R. Mann,et al.  Functional dissection of ultrabithorax proteins in D. melanogaster , 1990, Cell.

[30]  A. Ansari,et al.  Allosteric underwinding of DNA is a critical step in positive control of transcription by Hg-MerR , 1992, Nature.

[31]  K. Luger,et al.  Sequence-specific recognition of DNA in the nucleosome by pyrrole-imidazole polyamides. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[32]  C. Pabo,et al.  Oct-1 POU domain-DNA interactions: cooperative binding of isolated subdomains and effects of covalent linkage. , 1996, Genes & development.

[33]  Juan Botas,et al.  The DNA binding specificity of ultrabithorax is modulated by cooperative interactions with extradenticle, another homeoprotein , 1994, Cell.

[34]  C. Murre,et al.  The hexapeptide LFPWMR in Hoxb-8 is required for cooperative DNA binding with Pbx1 and Pbx2 proteins. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  Hans-Dieter Arndt,et al.  Minimization of a protein-DNA dimerizer. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[36]  A. Schepartz,et al.  STUDIES ON THE FORMATION OF DNA.PROTEIN INTERFACES: DNA SPECIFICITY AND STRAIGHTENING BY CREB , 1995 .

[37]  R. Lavery,et al.  Defining the structure of irregular nucleic acids: conventions and principles. , 1989, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[38]  R. Mann,et al.  Extra specificity from extradenticle: the partnership between HOX and PBX/EXD homeodomain proteins. , 1996, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[39]  W. Olson,et al.  3DNA: a software package for the analysis, rebuilding and visualization of three-dimensional nucleic acid structures. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[40]  Michael A. Crickmore,et al.  Functional Specificity of a Hox Protein Mediated by the Recognition of Minor Groove Structure , 2007, Cell.

[41]  C. Pabo,et al.  Geometric analysis and comparison of protein-DNA interfaces: why is there no simple code for recognition? , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  R. Beerli,et al.  Engineering polydactyl zinc-finger transcription factors , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[43]  P. Dervan,et al.  Solid phase synthesis of polyamides containing imidazole and pyrrole amino acids , 1996 .

[44]  C. Freund,et al.  Guidebook to the Homeobox Genes , 1995 .

[45]  Paul Carlson,et al.  DNA twisting and the effects of non-contacted bases on affinity of 434 operator for 434 represser , 1992, Nature.

[46]  P. Dervan,et al.  Temperature-sensitive protein-DNA dimerizers. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  C. Pabo,et al.  Design and selection of novel Cys2His2 zinc finger proteins. , 2001, Annual review of biochemistry.

[48]  L. Selleri,et al.  Hox cofactors in vertebrate development. , 2006, Developmental biology.

[49]  Kalle Gehring,et al.  Lock and Key Binding of the HOX YPWM Peptide to the PBX Homeodomain* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[50]  S. Carroll,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of selector gene function and evolution. , 2002, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[51]  C. S. Tung,et al.  Nucleic acid modeling tool (NAMOT): an interactive graphic tool for modeling nucleic acid structures , 1994, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[52]  Q. Lu,et al.  Structural determinants within Pbx1 that mediate cooperative DNA binding with pentapeptide-containing Hox proteins: proposal for a model of a Pbx1-Hox-DNA complex , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[53]  A Klug,et al.  Physical basis of a protein-DNA recognition code. , 1997, Current opinion in structural biology.

[54]  D. Crothers,et al.  Transmission of allosteric effects in DNA , 1979, Nature.

[55]  B. Sun,et al.  The degree of variation in DNA sequence recognition among four Drosophila homeotic proteins. , 1994, The EMBO journal.

[56]  Cynthia Wolberger,et al.  Structure of HoxA9 and Pbx1 bound to DNA: Hox hexapeptide and DNA recognition anterior to posterior. , 2003, Genes & development.

[57]  P. Dervan,et al.  Inhibition of major-groove-binding proteins by pyrrole-imidazole polyamides with an Arg-Pro-Arg positive patch. , 1998, Chemistry & biology.