Predicting acute contact toxicity of pesticides in honeybees (Apis mellifera) through a k-nearest neighbor model.

Ecological risk assessment of plant protection products (PPPs) requires an understanding of both the toxicity and the extent of exposure to assess risks for a range of taxa of ecological importance including target and non-target species. Non-target species such as honey bees (Apis mellifera), solitary bees and bumble bees are of utmost importance because of their vital ecological services as pollinators of wild plants and crops. To improve risk assessment of PPPs in bee species, computational models predicting the acute and chronic toxicity of a range of PPPs and contaminants can play a major role in providing structural and physico-chemical properties for the prioritisation of compounds of concern and future risk assessments. Over the last three decades, scientific advisory bodies and the research community have developed toxicological databases and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models that are proving invaluable to predict toxicity using historical data and reduce animal testing. This paper describes the development and validation of a k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) model using in-house software for the prediction of acute contact toxicity of pesticides on honey bees. Acute contact toxicity data were collected from different sources for 256 pesticides, which were divided into training and test sets. The k-NN models were validated with good prediction, with an accuracy of 70% for all compounds and of 65% for highly toxic compounds, suggesting that they might reliably predict the toxicity of structurally diverse pesticides and could be used to screen and prioritise new pesticides.

[1]  Emilio Benfenati,et al.  Using toxicological evidence from QSAR models in practice. , 2013, ALTEX.

[2]  J. Devillers,et al.  A General QSAR Model for Predicting the Acute Toxicity of Pesticides to Oncorhynchus mykiss , 2000, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[3]  M. Berenbaum,et al.  A deficit of detoxification enzymes: pesticide sensitivity and environmental response in the honeybee , 2006, Insect molecular biology.

[4]  K. Goka,et al.  Pesticide Residues and Bees – A Risk Assessment , 2014, PloS one.

[5]  Zhi-Hua Zhou,et al.  A k-nearest neighbor based algorithm for multi-label classification , 2005, 2005 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing.

[6]  A. Sabatini,et al.  Influence of brood rearing temperature on honey bee development and susceptibility to poisoning by pesticides , 2010 .

[7]  Daniel Neagu,et al.  Chapter 2 – Databases for pesticide ecotoxicity , 2007 .

[8]  Miquel Sànchez-Marrè,et al.  Nearest-Neighbours for Time Series , 2004, Applied Intelligence.

[9]  J. Dorne,et al.  Human and animal health risk assessments of chemicals in the food chain: comparative aspects and future perspectives. , 2013, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[10]  L. Belzunces,et al.  Seasonal variations in susceptibility of Apis mellifera to the synergistic action of prochloraz and deltamethrin , 1998 .

[11]  J. Brunet,et al.  Interactions between Nosema microspores and a neonicotinoid weaken honeybees (Apis mellifera) , 2010, Environmental microbiology.

[12]  A. Decourtye,et al.  Learning performances of honeybees (Apis mellifera L) are differentially affected by imidacloprid according to the season. , 2003, Pest management science.

[13]  A Doucet-Panaye,et al.  Structure–activity relationship (SAR) modelling of mosquito larvicides , 2015, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[14]  E. Benfenati,et al.  Comparison of in silico tools for evaluating rat oral acute toxicity† , 2015, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[15]  E. Benfenati,et al.  Assessment of in silico models for acute aquatic toxicity towards fish under REACH regulation , 2015, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[16]  J. Devillers,et al.  Multivariate structure‐property relationships (MSPR) of pesticides , 1992 .

[17]  Dinesh Mohan,et al.  QSTR modeling for qualitative and quantitative toxicity predictions of diverse chemical pesticides in honey bee for regulatory purposes. , 2014, Chemical research in toxicology.

[18]  J. Devillers,et al.  Comparative toxicity and hazards of pesticides to Apis and non-Apis bees. A chemometrical study , 2003, SAR and QSAR in environmental research.

[19]  J. Settele,et al.  Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline , 2009 .

[20]  Emilio Benfenati,et al.  Predicting persistence in the sediment compartment with a new automatic software based on the k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) algorithm. , 2016, Chemosphere.

[21]  Reed M. Johnson Honey bee toxicology. , 2015, Annual review of entomology.

[22]  David Weininger,et al.  SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules , 1988, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[23]  Noa Simon Delso,et al.  Scientific Opinion on the science behind the development of a risk assessment of Plant Protection Products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees) , 2012 .

[24]  Fabrizio Sebastiani,et al.  Machine learning in automated text categorization , 2001, CSUR.

[25]  A. Klein,et al.  Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Martin Ester,et al.  Optimally discriminative subnetwork markers predict response to chemotherapy , 2011, Bioinform..

[27]  D. Biron,et al.  Parasite-insecticide interactions: a case study of Nosema ceranae and fipronil synergy on honeybee , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[28]  R. Maleszka,et al.  Contrasting Effects of Imidacloprid on Habituation in 7- and 8-Day-Old Honeybees (Apis mellifera) , 2001, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.