Guiding Fellows to Independent Practice

Background Recent studies highlight the importance of physician readiness to practice beyond graduate training. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education mandates that pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows be prepared for independent practice by allowing “progressive responsibility for patient care.” Prior unpublished surveys of program directors (PDs) indicate variability in approaches to provide opportunities for more independent practice during fellowship training. Objectives The aims of the study were to describe practices within PEM fellowship programs allowing fellows to work without direct supervision and to identify any barriers to independent practice in training. Design/Methods An anonymous electronic survey of PEM fellowship PDs was performed. Survey items were developed using an iterative modified Delphi process and pilot tested. Close-ended survey responses and demographic variables were summarized with descriptive statistics. Responses to open-ended survey items were reviewed and categorized by theme. Results Seventy two of 84 PDs (88%) responded to the survey; however, not all surveys were completed. Of the 68 responses to whether fellows could work without direct supervision (as defined by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education) during some part of their training, 31 (45.6%) reported that fellows did have this opportunity. In most programs, clinical independence was conditional on specific measures including the number of clinical hours completed, milestone achievement, and approval by the clinical competency committee. Reported barriers to fellow practice without direct oversight included both regulatory and economic constraints. Conclusions Current training practices that provide PEM fellows with conditional clinical independence are variable. Future work should aim to determine best practices of entrustment, identify ideal transition points, and mitigate barriers to graduated responsibility.

[1]  N. Zuckerbraun,et al.  Milestone achievements in a national sample of pediatric emergency medicine fellows: impact of primary residency training , 2021, AEM education and training.

[2]  B. Schnapp,et al.  Use of graded responsibility and common entrustment considerations among United States emergency medicine residency programs , 2020, Journal of educational evaluation for health professions.

[3]  C. V. D. van der Vleuten,et al.  Resident-Sensitive Quality Measures in the Pediatric Emergency Department: Exploring Relationships With Supervisor Entrustment and Patient Acuity and Complexity , 2020, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[4]  M. Suneja,et al.  Learning to drive: resident physicians’ perceptions of how attending physicians promote and undermine autonomy , 2019, BMC medical education.

[5]  T. Daskivich,et al.  Progressive Independence in Clinical Training: Perspectives of a National, Multispecialty Panel of Residents and Fellows. , 2015, Journal of graduate medical education.

[6]  J. Charpie,et al.  Perceptions of 24/7 In-house Attending Coverage on Fellow Education and Autonomy in a Pediatric Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit. , 2015, Congenital heart disease.

[7]  Dorene Balmer,et al.  The greater good: how supervising physicians make entrustment decisions in the pediatric emergency department. , 2014, Academic pediatrics.

[8]  G. Geis,et al.  The spectrum and frequency of critical procedures performed in a pediatric emergency department: implications of a provider-level view. , 2013, Annals of emergency medicine.

[9]  V. Arora,et al.  Effects of increased overnight supervision on resident education, decision-making, and autonomy. , 2012, Journal of hospital medicine.

[10]  A. Mattu,et al.  Duty hours in emergency medicine: balancing patient safety, resident wellness, and the resident training experience: a consensus response to the 2008 Institute of Medicine resident duty hours recommendations. , 2010, The Journal of emergency medicine.

[11]  A. Mattu,et al.  Duty hours in emergency medicine: balancing patient safety, resident wellness, and the resident training experience: a consensus response to the 2008 institute of medicine resident duty hours recommendations. , 2010, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[12]  B. Bell Supervision, not regulation of hours, is the key to improving the quality of patient care. , 1993, JAMA.