Development of seismic fragility curves for mainshock-damaged reinforced-concrete structures

This communication presents an original procedure to derive fragility curves for previously damaged structural systems. These damage state-dependent functions constitute an important component in the framework of time-dependent risk assessment. For instance, they are used to estimate the updated vulnerability of structures exposed to potential aftershocks, based on the knowledge of their damage state after the main seismic event. While the state-of-the-art method for deriving such functions relies on incremental dynamic analysis, the present work proposes an alternative approach based on (i) the application of sequences of ground-motion records to the undamaged structure in order to have a representative panel of structures in each damage state, and (ii) an innovative statistical treatment of the permanent residual drift of damaged structures Δ_(p,t0) to derive the fragility functions: the maximum transient additional drift (Δ_(t,max)-Δ_(p,t0)) is correlated to the intensity measure of the ground motion, and the influence of the initial permanent drift is then eliminated by estimating its distribution for a given initial damage state. The developed procedure is applied to a single story reinforced-concrete frame with a concentrated plasticity model and fragility curves are proposed for various initial damage states.

[1]  Paolo Franchin,et al.  Allowing Traffic Over Mainshock-Damaged Bridges , 2009 .

[2]  Bruce R. Ellingwood,et al.  Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment , 2009 .

[3]  John Douglas,et al.  Development of seismic fragility surfaces for reinforced concrete buildings by means of nonlinear time‐history analysis , 2009 .

[4]  T. Rossettoa,et al.  Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data , 2003 .

[5]  R. Medina,et al.  A practical method for proper modeling of structural damping in inelastic plane structural systems , 2010 .

[6]  P. Bazzurro,et al.  DYNAMIC VERSUS STATIC COMPUTATION OF THE RESIDUAL CAPACITY OF A MAINSHOCK-DAMAGED BUILDING TO WITHSTAND AN AFTERSHOCK , 2002 .

[7]  Curt B. Haselton,et al.  Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings , 2006 .

[8]  C. Cornell,et al.  GUIDELINES FOR SEISMIC ASSESSMENT OF DAMAGED BUILDINGS , 2002 .

[9]  A. Ang,et al.  Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete , 1985 .

[10]  N. Luco,et al.  Developing fragilities for mainshock-damaged structures through incremental dynamic analysis , 2011 .

[11]  L. Ibarra Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations , 2003 .

[12]  Nicolas Luco,et al.  A methodology for post-mainshock probabilistic assessment of building collapse risk , 2011 .

[13]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[14]  Nicholas N. AMBRASEYS,et al.  DISSEMINATION OF EUROPEAN STRONG-MOTION DATA , VOLUME 2 , 2002 .