Evaluation of the Enhanced Assumed Strain and Assumed Natural Strain in the SSH3D and RESS3 Solid Shell Elements for Single Point Incremental Forming Simulation

Single Point Incremental Forming (SPIF) is a recent sheet forming process which can give a symmetrical or asymmetrical shape by using a small tool. Without the need of dies, the SPIF is capable to deal with rapid prototyping and small batch productions at low cost. Extensive research from both experimental and numerical sides has been carried out in the last years. Recent developments in the finite element simulations for sheet metal forming have allowed new modeling techniques, such as the Solid Shell elements, which combine the main features of shell hypothesis with a solid-brick element. In this article, two recently developed elements -SSH3D element [1, 2] and RESS3 element [3]- implemented in Lagamine (finite element code developed by the ArGEnCo department of the University of Liège) are explained and evaluated using the SPIF line test. To avoid locking problems, the well-known Enhanced Assumed Strain (EAS) and Assumed Natural Strain (ANS) techniques are used. The influence of the different EAS and ANS parameters are analized comparing the predicted tool forces and the shape of a transversal cut, at the end of the process. The results show a strong influence of the EAS in the forces prediction, proving that a correct choice is fundamental for an accurate simulation of the SPIF using Solid Shell elements.

[1]  Joost R. Duflou,et al.  Force prediction for single point incremental forming deduced from experimental and FEM observations , 2010 .

[2]  Julian M. Allwood,et al.  The mechanics of incremental sheet forming , 2009 .

[3]  Joost Duflou,et al.  Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal , 2005 .

[4]  Jun Gu,et al.  Development of an inverse method for identification of materials parameters in the single point incremental sheet forming process , 2007 .

[5]  J. Duflou,et al.  Material data identification to model the single point incremental forming process , 2010 .

[6]  C. Henrard,et al.  Forming forces in single point incremental forming: prediction by finite element simulations, validation and sensitivity , 2011 .

[7]  K. Bathe,et al.  A continuum mechanics based four‐node shell element for general non‐linear analysis , 1984 .

[8]  Fabrizio Micari,et al.  Analysis of Material Formability in Incremental Forming , 2002 .

[9]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A CLASS OF MIXED ASSUMED STRAIN METHODS AND THE METHOD OF INCOMPATIBLE MODES , 1990 .

[10]  Christophe Henrard,et al.  Comparison of the tests chosen for material parameter identification to predict single point incremental forming forces , 2008 .

[11]  Laurent Duchene,et al.  Assessment of the enhanced assumed strain (EAS) and the assumed natural strain (ANS) techniques in the mechanical behavior of the SSH3D solid-shell element , 2011 .

[12]  Laurent Duchene,et al.  Length changes and texture prediction during free end torsion test of copper bars with FEM and remeshing techniques , 2007 .

[13]  Jeong Whan Yoon,et al.  On the use of a reduced enhanced solid-shell finite element for sheet metal forming , 2007 .

[14]  Laurent Duchene,et al.  New Solid‐Shell Finite Element Based on EAS and ANS Concepts for Sheet Metal Forming , 2011 .