The Current State and Future of CRISPR-Cas9 gRNA Design Tools

Recent years have seen the development of computational tools to assist researchers in performing CRISPR-Cas9 experiment optimally. More specifically, these tools aim to maximize on-target activity (guide efficiency) while also minimizing potential off-target effects (guide specificity) by analyzing the features of the target site. Nonetheless, currently available tools cannot robustly predict experimental success as prediction accuracy depends on the approximations of the underlying model and how closely the experimental setup matches the data the model was trained on. Here, we present an overview of the available computational tools, their current limitations and future considerations. We discuss new trends around personalized health by taking genomic variants into account when predicting target sites as well as discussing other governing factors that can improve prediction accuracy.

[1]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  Henriette O'Geen,et al.  A genome-wide analysis of Cas9 binding specificity using ChIP-seq and targeted sequence capture , 2014, bioRxiv.

[3]  Matthew C. Canver,et al.  Impact of Genetic Variation on CRISPR-Cas Targeting. , 2018, The CRISPR journal.

[4]  Lei S. Qi,et al.  The New State of the Art: Cas9 for Gene Activation and Repression , 2015, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[5]  Matthew C. Canver,et al.  Variant-aware saturating mutagenesis using multiple Cas9 nucleases identifies regulatory elements at trait-associated loci , 2017, Nature Genetics.

[6]  L. Zhu,et al.  CRISPRseek: A Bioconductor Package to Identify Target-Specific Guide RNAs for CRISPR-Cas9 Genome-Editing Systems , 2014, PloS one.

[7]  Max A. Horlbeck,et al.  Nucleosomes impede Cas9 access to DNA in vivo and in vitro , 2016, eLife.

[8]  E. Lander,et al.  Genetic Screens in Human Cells Using the CRISPR-Cas9 System , 2013, Science.

[9]  B. Davies,et al.  CRISPR-Cas orthologues and variants: optimizing the repertoire, specificity and delivery of genome engineering tools , 2017, Mammalian Genome.

[10]  J. Joung,et al.  CIRCLE-seq: a highly sensitive in vitro screen for genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease off-targets , 2017, Nature Methods.

[11]  Toshio Ando,et al.  Real-space and real-time dynamics of CRISPR-Cas9 visualized by high-speed atomic force microscopy , 2017, Nature Communications.

[12]  Denis C. Bauer,et al.  High Activity Target-Site Identification Using Phenotypic Independent CRISPR-Cas9 Core Functionality. , 2018, The CRISPR journal.

[13]  Charles E. Vejnar,et al.  CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR/Cas9 targeting in vivo , 2015, Nature Methods.

[14]  James A. Gagnon,et al.  Efficient CRISPR-Cas9-mediated generation of knockin human pluripotent stem cells lacking undesired mutations at the targeted locus. , 2015, Cell reports.

[15]  J. Keith Joung,et al.  High frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[16]  J. Doudna,et al.  A Programmable Dual-RNA–Guided DNA Endonuclease in Adaptive Bacterial Immunity , 2012, Science.

[17]  Max A. Horlbeck,et al.  Compact and highly active next-generation libraries for CRISPR-mediated gene repression and activation , 2016, eLife.

[18]  Eli J. Fine,et al.  DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[19]  Shailesh Sharma,et al.  SSFinder: high throughput CRISPR-Cas target sites prediction tool. , 2014 .

[20]  David M. Reif,et al.  Machine Learning for Detecting Gene-Gene Interactions , 2006, Applied bioinformatics.

[21]  Nicole M. Gaudelli,et al.  Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage , 2017, Nature.

[22]  David A. Scott,et al.  Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  J. Kent,et al.  Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR , 2016, Genome Biology.

[24]  James E. DiCarlo,et al.  RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9 , 2013, Science.

[25]  W. Lim,et al.  Nucleosome breathing and remodeling constrain CRISPR-Cas9 function , 2016, eLife.

[26]  Leslie S. Edwards,et al.  Mapping the genomic landscape of CRISPR–Cas9 cleavage , 2017, Nature Methods.

[27]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  GUIDE-Seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[28]  Sangsu Bae,et al.  Microhomology-based choice of Cas9 nuclease target sites , 2014, Nature Methods.

[29]  David A. Scott,et al.  Implications of human genetic variation in CRISPR-based therapeutic genome editing , 2017, Nature Medicine.

[30]  Jin-Soo Kim,et al.  Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases , 2014, Bioinform..

[31]  Jennifer Listgarten,et al.  Prediction of off-target activities for the end-to-end design of CRISPR guide RNAs , 2018, Nature Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  Daniel Capurso,et al.  DNA Repair Profiling Reve als Nonrandom Outcomes at Cas 9-Mediated Breaks Graphical Abstract Highlights , 2016 .

[33]  Meagan E. Sullender,et al.  Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR-Cas9–mediated gene inactivation , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[34]  Mazhar Adli,et al.  Genome-wide analysis reveals characteristics of off-target sites bound by the Cas9 endonuclease , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[35]  Yilong Li,et al.  Genome-wide recessive genetic screening in mammalian cells with a lentiviral CRISPR-guide RNA library , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[36]  Qiang Sun,et al.  Homology-mediated end joining-based targeted integration using CRISPR/Cas9 , 2017, Cell Research.

[37]  Rongchen Wang,et al.  Production of Guide RNAs in vitro and in vivo for CRISPR Using Ribozymes and RNA Polymerase II Promoters. , 2017, Bio-protocol.

[38]  H. Kim,et al.  A guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases , 2014, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[39]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[40]  Meagan E. Sullender,et al.  Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR-Cas9 , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[41]  Xiaowei Wang,et al.  WU-CRISPR: characteristics of functional guide RNAs for the CRISPR/Cas9 system , 2015, Genome Biology.

[42]  Itay Mayrose,et al.  A machine learning approach for predicting CRISPR-Cas9 cleavage efficiencies and patterns underlying its mechanism of action , 2017, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[43]  Steven Salzberg,et al.  Short Read Mapping: An Algorithmic Tour , 2017, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[44]  G. Church,et al.  Unraveling CRISPR-Cas9 genome engineering parameters via a library-on-library approach , 2015, Nature Methods.

[45]  Jean-Claude Tardif,et al.  Human genetic variation alters CRISPR-Cas9 on- and off-targeting specificity at therapeutically implicated loci , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Mazhar Adli,et al.  Cas9-chromatin binding information enables more accurate CRISPR off-target prediction , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[47]  Jin-Soo Kim,et al.  Cas-Database: web-based genome-wide guide RNA library design for gene knockout screens using CRISPR-Cas9 , 2016, Bioinform..

[48]  Neville E. Sanjana,et al.  Genome-Scale CRISPR-Cas9 Knockout Screening in Human Cells , 2014, Science.

[49]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  One-Step Generation of Mice Carrying Reporter and Conditional Alleles by CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Genome Engineering , 2013, Cell.

[50]  T. Takumi,et al.  Sequence features associated with the cleavage efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9 system , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[51]  Yanhui Hu,et al.  Enhanced specificity and efficiency of the CRISPR/Cas9 system with optimized sgRNA parameters in Drosophila. , 2014, Cell reports.

[52]  Howard M. Salis,et al.  A Biophysical Model of CRISPR/Cas9 Activity for Rational Design of Genome Editing and Gene Regulation , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[53]  R. Tjian,et al.  Dynamics of CRISPR-Cas9 genome interrogation in living cells , 2015, Science.

[54]  Yanfang Jiang,et al.  Targeted activation of diverse CRISPR-Cas systems for mammalian genome editing via proximal CRISPR targeting , 2017, Nature Communications.

[55]  Jennifer Doudna,et al.  RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells , 2013, eLife.

[56]  Xingxu Huang,et al.  sgRNAcas9: A Software Package for Designing CRISPR sgRNA and Evaluating Potential Off-Target Cleavage Sites , 2014, PloS one.