Projected and receptive fields: a comparison of projected areas of sensations evoked by intraneural stimulation of mechanoreceptive units, and their innervation territories.

Microneurography and intraneural microstimulation were employed in awake human subjects to study the characteristics of cutaneous mechanoreceptive units and the sensations mediated by them. 172 units innervating the hand and forearm were identified as either PC, RA (FA in hairy skin), SA I or SA II. Analysis of action potential waveforms in a sample of units suggests that most recordings were from within the myelin sheath. Receptive fields of RA and SA I units were significantly smaller than those of PC and SA II units and showed a proximodistal size gradient, which the latter two did not. The quality of sensations evoked by intraneural stimulation was determined by the type of unit activated, except in the case of SA II units, and their magnitude could be influenced by mechanical coactivation of other sensory units. As a rule projected fields of evoked sensations were larger the further away they were from the limb tip. This grading indicates that inputs from single mechanoreceptive units are processed differently according to their source and sensory submodality, possibly as a result of unequal "resolving powers" of the corresponding cortical neurons.

[1]  I. Tasaki.  Properties of myelinated fibers in frog sciatic nerve and in spinal cord as examined with micro-electrodes. , 1952, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[2]  V. Mountcastle.  Modality and topographic properties of single neurons of cat's somatic sensory cortex. , 1957, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  V. Mountcastle,et al.  Neural mechanisms subserving cutaneous sensibility, with special reference to the role of afferent inhibition in sensory perception and discrimination. , 1959, Bulletin of the Johns Hopkins Hospital.

[4]  P R Burgess,et al.  Receptor types in cat hairy skin supplied by myelinated fibers. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  A. Vallbo,et al.  Activity from skin mechanoreceptors recorded percutaneously in awake human subjects. , 1968, Experimental neurology.

[6]  The action potentials recorded from undamaged nerve fibres with micro-electrodes. , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  K. Hagbarth,et al.  Afferent impulses in median nerve fascicles evoked by tactile stimuli of the human hand. , 1970, Brain research.

[8]  M. Knibestöl,et al.  Single unit analysis of mechanoreceptor activity from the human glabrous skin. , 1970, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[9]  K. Hagbarth,et al.  Single unit potentials with complex waveform seen in microelectrode recordings from the human median nerve. , 1970, Brain research.

[10]  A. Vallbo,et al.  Prediction of propagation block on the basis of impulse shape in single unit recordings from human nerves. , 1976, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[11]  K W Horch,et al.  A key to the classification of cutaneous mechanoreceptors. , 1977, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[12]  R. Johansson.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: receptive field characteristics of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin area. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  M. Hulliger,et al.  The responses of afferent fibres from the glabrous skin of the hand during voluntary finger movements in man. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  A. Vallbo,et al.  Somatosensory, proprioceptive, and sympathetic activity in human peripheral nerves. , 1979, Physiological reviews.

[15]  J. Kaas,et al.  Multiple representations of the body within the primary somatosensory cortex of primates. , 1979, Science.

[16]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensibility in the human hand: relative and absolute densities of four types of mechanoreceptive units in glabrous skin. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  H. E. Torebjörk,et al.  Specific sensations evoked by activity in single identified sensory units in man. , 1980 .

[18]  R. Johansson,et al.  Spatial properties of the population of mechanoreceptive units in the glabrous skin of the human hand , 1980, Brain Research.

[19]  C. Robinson,et al.  Organization of somatosensory receptive fields in cortical areas 7b, retroinsula, postauditory and granular insula of M. fascicularis , 1980, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  R. Dykes,et al.  Organization of primary somatosensory cortex in the cat. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Heikki Hämäläinen,et al.  Peripheral neural basis of tactile sensations in man: II. Characteristics of human mechanoreceptors in the hairy skin and correlations of their activity with tactile sensations , 1981, Brain Research.

[22]  P. Wall,et al.  Effect of peripheral nerve injury on receptive fields of cells in the cat spinal cord , 1981 .

[23]  A. Vallbo,et al.  Sensations evoked from the glabrous skin of the human hand by electrical stimulation of unitary mechanosensitive afferents , 1981, Brain Research.

[24]  J. Kaas,et al.  Reorganization of mammalian somatosensory cortex following peripheral nerve injury , 1982, Trends in Neurosciences.

[25]  J. Ochoa,et al.  Sensations evoked by intraneural microstimulation of single mechanoreceptor units innervating the human hand. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  H. E. Torebjörk,et al.  Cerebral localisation function from the input of single mechanoreceptive units in man. , 1983, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[27]  R. Johansson,et al.  Tactile sensory coding in the glabrous skin of the human hand , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  H. E. Torebjörk,et al.  Peripheral projections of nerve fibres in the human median nerve , 1983, Brain Research.