Kinetic Modeling of Contrast-Enhanced MRI: An Automated Technique for Assessing Inflammation in the Rheumatoid Arthritis Wrist

In recent years, development of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) drug therapy has been more directly targeted to counteract specific mechanisms of inflammation, and it is now believed that early aggressive treatment with disease modifying drugs is important to inhibit future structural joint damage. The development of these new treatments has increased the need for methodologies to assess disease activity in RA and monitor the effectiveness of drug therapy. Unlike X-ray, which shows only structural bone damage, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can depict soft tissue damage and synovitis, the primary pathology of RA. Recent studies have also indicated that MRI is sensitive to pathophysiologic changes that may predate radiographic erosions and may predict future joint damage. In this study, we have developed a computer automated analysis technique for MR wrist images that provides an objective measure of RA synovitis. This method applies a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model to every voxel of a dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) dataset and outputs resulting parametric images. The aim of this technique is to not only objectively quantify the severity of rheumatoid synovitis, but to also locally determine where areas of serious disease activity are situated through kinetic modeling of blood-tissue exchange. Preliminary results show good correlation to early enhancement rate, which has previously been shown to be a useful clinical marker of RA activity. However, the use of tracer kinetic modeling methods potentially provides more specific information regarding underlying RA physiology. This approach could provide a useful new tool in RA patient management and could substantially improve RA therapeutic studies by calculating objective biomarkers of the disease state.

[1]  D. Bergin,et al.  Power Doppler ultrasound assessment of rheumatoid hand synovitis. , 2001, The Journal of rheumatology.

[2]  Enzo Silvestri,et al.  Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in patients with rheumatoid arthritis can discriminate active from inactive disease. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  C. Crone,et al.  THE PERMEABILITY OF CAPILLARIES IN VARIOUS ORGANS AS DETERMINED BY USE OF THE 'INDICATOR DIFFUSION' METHOD. , 1963, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[4]  F. McQueen,et al.  What is the fate of erosions in early rheumatoid arthritis? Tracking individual lesions using x rays and magnetic resonance imaging over the first two years of disease. , 2001, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[5]  Ting-Yim Lee,et al.  In vivo CT measurement of blood-brain transfer constant of iopamidol in human brain tumors , 1992, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[6]  Chun Yuan,et al.  Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Neovasculature Volume in Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque , 2003, Circulation.

[7]  H K Genant,et al.  MR imaging of the arthritic rabbit knee joint using albumin-(Gd-DTPA)30 with correlation to histopathology. , 1999, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  P. Hannonen,et al.  Comparison of combination therapy with single-drug therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[9]  Thomas M. Link,et al.  Correlation of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with histologic tumor grade: comparison of macromolecular and small-molecular contrast media , 1998, Pediatric Radiology.

[10]  K J Wolf,et al.  Rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of hypervascular and fibrous pannus with dynamic MR imaging enhanced with Gd-DTPA. , 1990, Radiology.

[11]  B. Dardzinski,et al.  Quantifying dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI of the knee in children with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis using an arterial input function (AIF) extracted from popliteal artery enhancement, and the effect of the choice of the AIF on the kinetic parameters , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  F. Amalric,et al.  Endothelial cell phenotypes in the rheumatoid synovium: activated, angiogenic, apoptotic and leaky , 2004, Arthritis research & therapy.

[13]  V. Jevtič,et al.  Precontrast and postcontrast (Gd-DTPA) magnetic resonance imaging of hand joints in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. , 1993, Clinical radiology.

[14]  Rene Westhovens,et al.  COBRA combination therapy in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: long-term structural benefits of a brief intervention. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[15]  A. Jackson,et al.  Parametric mapping of scaled fitting error in dynamic susceptibility contrast enhanced MR perfusion imaging. , 2000, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  J. Ridgway,et al.  Comparative assessment of leflunomide and methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, by dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[17]  D M Foster,et al.  Developing and testing integrated multicompartment models to describe a single-input multiple-output study using the SAAM II software system. , 1998, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[18]  D. Blake,et al.  Quantitative assessment of the rheumatoid synovial microvascular bed by gadolinium-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[19]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Reliability and sensitivity to change of a simplification of the Sharp/van der Heijde radiological assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1999, Rheumatology.

[20]  O. Henriksen,et al.  Changes in synovial membrane and joint effusion volumes after intraarticular methylprednisolone. Quantitative assessment of inflammatory and destructive changes in arthritis by MRI. , 1996, The Journal of rheumatology.

[21]  Michael J. Green,et al.  Elucidation of the relationship between synovitis and bone damage: a randomized magnetic resonance imaging study of individual joints in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[22]  Marcin Szkudlarek,et al.  New radiographic bone erosions in the wrists of patients with rheumatoid arthritis are detectable with magnetic resonance imaging a median of two years earlier. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[23]  J. Price Principles of tracer kinetic analysis. , 2003, Neuroimaging clinics of North America.

[24]  E. M. Renkin Transport of potassium-42 from blood to tissue in isolated mammalian skeletal muscles. , 1959, The American journal of physiology.

[25]  Orhan Nalcioglu,et al.  Correlation of dynamic contrast enhancement MRI parameters with microvessel density and VEGF for assessment of angiogenesis in breast cancer , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  S. van der Linden,et al.  Randomised comparison of combined step-down prednisolone, methotrexate and sulphasalazine with sulphasalazine alone in early rheumatoid arthritis , 1997, The Lancet.

[27]  D M Shames,et al.  Quantification of the extraction fraction for gadopentetate across breast cancer capillaries , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  M Ostergaard,et al.  Quantification of synovistis by MRI: correlation between dynamic and static gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and microscopic and macroscopic signs of synovial inflammation. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[29]  C. Cobelli,et al.  Evaluation of compartmental and spectral analysis models of [/sup 18/F]FDG kinetics for heart and brain studies with PET , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[30]  A. Jackson,et al.  Comparative study into the robustness of compartmental modeling and model‐free analysis in DCE‐MRI studies , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  F. Starr,et al.  Measurement of blood‐brain barrier permeability in a tumor model using magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium‐dtpa , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  A. Piccoli,et al.  Contrast medium in power Doppler ultrasound for assessment of synovial vascularity: comparison with arthroscopy. , 2003, The Journal of rheumatology.

[33]  T. Roberts,et al.  Physiologic measurements by contrast‐enhanced MR imaging: Expectations and limitations , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[34]  J J Anderson,et al.  American College of Rheumatology. Preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[35]  J. Ilonen,et al.  Delay to institution of therapy and induction of remission using single-drug or combination-disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis. , 2002, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[36]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[37]  C S Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data , 1983, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[38]  C Yuan,et al.  Surface coil phased arrays for high‐resolution imaging of the carotid arteries , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[39]  H. Kauczor,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI for assessing the disease activity of multiple myeloma: A comparative study with histology and clinical markers , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[40]  D M Shames,et al.  Measurement of capillary permeability to macromolecules by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging: A quantitative noninvasive technique , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[41]  Atle Bjørnerud,et al.  Quantification of breast tumor microvascular permeability with feruglose-enhanced MR imaging: initial phase II multicenter trial. , 2003, Radiology.