A computerized photographic assessment of the relationship between skeletal discrepancy and mandibular outline asymmetry.

The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between mandibular outline asymmetry and skeletal discrepancy in a sample of orthodontic patients (33 females, 33 males) aged from 8 to 19 years. Skeletal discrepancy was assessed in both the anteroposterior and vertical planes, using standard cephalometric analyses. All were photographed under standardized conditions and the photographs were then digitized for analysis using a computerized system to assess differences in four variables (area, perimeter, compactness and moment-ratio) between the right and left sides of the mandibular outline. The results showed good repeatability of the photographic, cephalometric and digitization methods. A statistically significant relationship was found between mandibular outline asymmetry and both anteroposterior and vertical skeletal discrepancy in this sample, when compared with patients with an average skeletal pattern. There appeared to be a statistically significant relationship between a reduced ANB angle (< 3 degrees) and mandibular outline asymmetry (P = 0.051), as well as between an increase in lower face height and mandibular asymmetry (P = 0.023).

[1]  L. Claman,et al.  Standardized portrait photography for dental patients. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[2]  A K Melnik,et al.  A cephalometric study of mandibular asymmetry in a longitudinally followed sample of growing children. , 1992, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[3]  Combined effects of errors in frontal-view asymmetry diagnosis. , 1996, European journal of orthodontics.

[4]  B. Malypetrovă [Asymmetry of the face]. , 1977, Ceskoslovenska stomatologie.

[5]  D. Wertheim,et al.  Clinical and computerized assessment of mandibular asymmetry. , 2001, European journal of orthodontics.

[6]  S M Shah,et al.  An assessment of asymmetry in the normal craniofacial complex. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[7]  Seiji Haraguchi,et al.  Facial asymmetry in subjects with skeletal Class III deformity. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[8]  J H Kronman,et al.  A posteroanterior cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial asymmetry. , 1967, The Angle orthodontist.

[9]  David Wertheim,et al.  A system for assessing mandibular outlines , 2000 .

[10]  Ezatollah Hazrati Distance from symmetry: A three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry. , 1996 .

[11]  David Wertheim,et al.  Comparison of radiographic and photographic measurement of mandibular asymmetry. , 2003, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  P W Major,et al.  Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[13]  R M Ricketts,et al.  Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. , 1981, The Angle orthodontist.

[14]  Mohammad Y Hajeer,et al.  Three-dimensional assessment of facial soft-tissue asymmetry before and after orthognathic surgery. , 2004, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[15]  David Wertheim,et al.  Mandibular outline assessment in three groups of orthodontic patients. , 2002, European journal of orthodontics.

[16]  V F Ferrario,et al.  The effect of sex and age on facial asymmetry in healthy subjects: a cross-sectional study from adolescence to mid-adulthood. , 2001, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[17]  B Solow,et al.  Natural head position in standing subjects. , 1971, Acta odontologica Scandinavica.

[18]  F S Chebib,et al.  Indices of craniofacial asymmetry. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[19]  D C Grummons,et al.  A frontal asymmetry analysis. , 1987, Journal of clinical orthodontics : JCO.

[20]  Grummons Dc,et al.  A frontal asymmetry analysis. , 1987 .

[21]  J. Cook Asymmetry of the Cranio-facial Skeleton , 1980, British journal of orthodontics.

[22]  D. Tm,et al.  Skeletal and dental arch asymmetries in individuals with normal dental occlusions. , 1994 .

[23]  B. C. Leighton,et al.  A Manual of Facial Growth: A Computer Analysis of Longitudinal Cephalometric Growth Data , 1993 .

[24]  P. Wilson,et al.  Angular asymmetries of the human face. , 2000, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[25]  J. R. Thompson Asymmetry of the Face , 1943 .

[26]  R. Pigott,et al.  A computer-aided method of measuring nasal symmetry in the cleft lip nose. , 1993, British journal of plastic surgery.

[27]  J. Mulick,et al.  AN INVESTIGATION OF CRANIOFACIAL ASYMMETRY USING THE SERIAL TWIN-STUDY METHOD. , 1965, American journal of orthodontics.

[28]  Proffit Wr,et al.  The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina. , 1997 .

[29]  S Peck,et al.  Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[30]  B. Matthews,et al.  A computer-based method of measuring facial asymmetry. Results from an assessment of the repair of cleft lip deformities. , 1987, British journal of plastic surgery.

[31]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[32]  Random Errors in Localization of Landmarks in Postero-anterior Cephalograms , 1999 .

[33]  P. Vig,et al.  Asymmetry of the human facial skeleton. , 1975, The Angle orthodontist.

[34]  S. Lindauer,et al.  Variability of facial photographs for use in treatment planning for orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. , 1997, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.