On the relevance of modulation transfer function measurements in digital mammography quality control

Abstract. Purpose: The relevance of presampling modulation transfer function (MTF) measurements in digital mammography (DM) quality control (QC) is examined. Two studies are presented: a case study on the impact of a reduction in MTF on the technical image quality score and analysis of the robustness of routine QC MTF measurements. Approach: In the first study, two needle computed radiography (CR) plates with identical sensitivities were used with differences in the 50% point of the MTF (fMTF0.5) larger than the limiting value in the European guidelines (>10  %   change between successive measurements). Technical image quality was assessed via threshold gold thickness of the CDMAM phantom and threshold microcalcification diameter of the L1 structured phantom. For the second study, presampling MTF results from 595 half-yearly QC tests of 55 DM systems (16 types, six manufacturers) were analyzed for changes from the baseline value and changes in fMTF0.5 between successive tests. Results: A reduction of 20% in fMTF0.5 of the two CR plates was observed. There was a tendency to a lower score for task-based metrics, but none were significant. Averaging over 55 systems, the absolute relative change in fMTF0.5 between consecutive tests (with 95% confidence interval) was 3% (2.5% to 3.4%). Analysis of the maximum relative change from baseline revealed changes of up to −10  %   for one a-Se based system and −15  %   for a group of CsI-based systems. Conclusions: A limit of 10% is a relevant action level for investigation. If exceeded, then the impact on performance has to be verified with extra metrics.

[1]  F R Verdun,et al.  A comparison of the performance of digital mammography systems. , 2007, Medical physics.

[2]  I. Cunningham Applied Linear-Systems Theory , 2000 .

[3]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control. , 2005, Medical physics.

[4]  I A Cunningham,et al.  Fundamental x-ray interaction limits in diagnostic imaging detectors: spatial resolution. , 2008, Medical physics.

[5]  Martin J Yaffe,et al.  Detectors for digital mammography. , 2004, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[6]  F R Verdun,et al.  Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Dev P Chakraborty,et al.  The relationship between cancer detection in mammography and image quality measurements. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[8]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system. , 2012, Medical physics.

[9]  Louise Poissant Part I , 1996, Leonardo.

[10]  R. Adams Measurement of the Performance Characteristics of Diagnostic X-Ray Systems Used in Medicine: Part II, X-Ray Intensifier TelevisionSystems , 1983 .

[11]  K T Michael The application of quantitative data analysis for the assessment of flat panel x-ray detectors in digital radiography as part of a quality assurance programme , 2017 .

[12]  Ulrich Neitzel,et al.  Accuracy of a simple method for deriving the presampled modulation transfer function of a digital radiographic system from an edge image. , 2003, Medical physics.

[13]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Systematic approach to a channelized Hotelling model observer implementation for a physical phantom containing mass-like lesions: Application to digital breast tomosynthesis. , 2019, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[14]  Alistair Mackenzie,et al.  Simulation of images of CDMAM phantom and the estimation of measurement uncertainties of threshold gold thickness. , 2017, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[15]  Nicholas Marshall,et al.  Physical Image Quality Evaluation of X-ray Detectors for Digital Radiography and Mammography , 2017 .

[16]  N W Marshall,et al.  Early experience in the use of quantitative image quality measurements for the quality assurance of full field digital mammography x-ray systems , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  D. Dance,et al.  Design and application of a structured phantom for detection performance comparison between breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  J. Rowlands,et al.  The physics of computed radiography. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  F. Patrick Doty,et al.  Effect of Humidity on Scintillation Performance in Na and Tl Activated CsI Crystals , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[20]  E. Samei,et al.  A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. , 1998, Medical physics.

[21]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Tailoring automatic exposure control toward constant detectability in digital mammography. , 2015, Medical physics.

[22]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  15 years of remotely controlled daily quality control in digital mammography , 2020, Other Conferences.

[23]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Effect of image quality on calcification detection in digital mammography. , 2012, Medical physics.

[24]  N W Marshall,et al.  Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors. , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Evaluation of software for reading images of the CDMAM test object to assess digital mammography systems , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[26]  European protocol for the quality control of the physical and technical aspects of mammography screening 2 a Screen-film mammography 2 b Digital mammography , 1999 .

[27]  N W Marshall,et al.  Retrospective analysis of a detector fault for a full field digital mammography system , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  Goran Ristic,et al.  X-ray imaging performance of structured cesium iodide scintillators. , 2004, Medical physics.