Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations.

The origin of organismal complexity is generally thought to be tightly coupled to the evolution of new gene functions arising subsequent to gene duplication. Under the classical model for the evolution of duplicate genes, one member of the duplicated pair usually degenerates within a few million years by accumulating deleterious mutations, while the other duplicate retains the original function. This model further predicts that on rare occasions, one duplicate may acquire a new adaptive function, resulting in the preservation of both members of the pair, one with the new function and the other retaining the old. However, empirical data suggest that a much greater proportion of gene duplicates is preserved than predicted by the classical model. Here we present a new conceptual framework for understanding the evolution of duplicate genes that may help explain this conundrum. Focusing on the regulatory complexity of eukaryotic genes, we show how complementary degenerative mutations in different regulatory elements of duplicated genes can facilitate the preservation of both duplicates, thereby increasing long-term opportunities for the evolution of new gene functions. The duplication-degeneration-complementation (DDC) model predicts that (1) degenerative mutations in regulatory elements can increase rather than reduce the probability of duplicate gene preservation and (2) the usual mechanism of duplicate gene preservation is the partitioning of ancestral functions rather than the evolution of new functions. We present several examples (including analysis of a new engrailed gene in zebrafish) that appear to be consistent with the DDC model, and we suggest several analytical and experimental approaches for determining whether the complementary loss of gene subfunctions or the acquisition of novel functions are likely to be the primary mechanisms for the preservation of gene duplicates. For a newly duplicated paralog, survival depends on the outcome of the race between entropic decay and chance acquisition of an advantageous regulatory mutation. Sidow 1996(p. 717) On one hand, it may fix an advantageous allele giving it a slightly different, and selectable, function from its original copy. This initial fixation provides substantial protection against future fixation of null mutations, allowing additional mutations to accumulate that refine functional differentiation. Alternatively, a duplicate locus can instead first fix a null allele, becoming a pseudogene. Walsh 1995 (p. 426) Duplicated genes persist only if mutations create new and essential protein functions, an event that is predicted to occur rarely. Nadeau and Sankoff 1997 (p. 1259) Thus overall, with complex metazoans, the major mechanism for retention of ancient gene duplicates would appear to have been the acquisition of novel expression sites for developmental genes, with its accompanying opportunity for new gene roles underlying the progressive extension of development itself. Cooke et al. 1997 (p. 362)

[1]  J. Haldane,et al.  The Part Played by Recurrent Mutation in Evolution , 1933, The American Naturalist.

[2]  W. E. Jeffrey Development in Development. , 1964 .

[3]  C. R. Henson Conclusion , 1969 .

[4]  F. Allendorf,et al.  GENE DUPLICATION WITHIN THE FAMILY SALMONIDAE: II. DETECTION AND DETERMINATION OF THE GENETIC CONTROL OF DUPLICATE LOCI THROUGH INHERITANCE STUDIES AND THE EXAMINATION OF POPULATIONS , 1975 .

[5]  G. S. Whitt,et al.  Loss of duplicate gene expression after polyploidisation , 1977, Nature.

[6]  E. Lewis A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila , 1978, Nature.

[7]  W. Li,et al.  Rate of gene silencing at duplicate loci: a theoretical study and interpretation of data from tetraploid fishes. , 1980, Genetics.

[8]  M. Goodman,et al.  Linkage relationships of 19 enzyme Loci in maize. , 1980, Genetics.

[9]  G. A. Watterson,et al.  On the time for gene silencing at duplicate Loci. , 1983, Genetics.

[10]  J. Jack,et al.  Four distinct regulatory regions of the cut locus and their effect on cell type specification in Drosophila. , 1991, Genetics.

[11]  A. Chakravarti,et al.  Genetic linkage map of fishes of the genus Xiphophorus (Teleostei: Poeciliidae). , 1991, Genetics.

[12]  E. Coen,et al.  The war of the whorls: genetic interactions controlling flower development , 1991, Nature.

[13]  B. Kay,et al.  Xenopus laevis : practical uses in cell and molecular biology , 1991 .

[14]  C. A. Gardner,et al.  Expression patterns of engrailed‐like proteins in the chick embryo , 1992, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[15]  J. Doebley,et al.  Comparative genome mapping of Sorghum and maize. , 1992, Genetics.

[16]  J. Postlethwait,et al.  Structure of the zebrafish snail1 gene and its expression in wild-type, spadetail and no tail mutant embryos. , 1993, Development.

[17]  A. Hughes,et al.  Evolution of duplicate genes in a tetraploid animal, Xenopus laevis. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.

[18]  A. Sidow,et al.  Gene duplications and the origins of vertebrate development. , 1994, Development (Cambridge, England). Supplement.

[19]  A. Clark,et al.  Invasion and maintenance of a gene duplication. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  J. B. Walsh,et al.  How often do duplicated genes evolve new functions? , 1995, Genetics.

[21]  M. Ekker,et al.  The evolution of the vertebrate Dlx gene family. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  A. Mccarthy Development , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[23]  N. Williams,et al.  Sequence and embryonic expression of the amphioxus engrailed gene (AmphiEn): the metameric pattern of transcription resembles that of its segment-polarity homolog in Drosophila. , 1997, Development.

[24]  S. Carroll,et al.  Evolution of the entire arthropod Hox gene set predated the origin and radiation of the onychophoran/arthropod clade , 1997, Current Biology.

[25]  D W Stock,et al.  Relationship between the genomic organization and the overlapping embryonic expression patterns of the zebrafish dlx genes. , 1997, Genomics.

[26]  D. Sankoff,et al.  Comparable rates of gene loss and functional divergence after genome duplications early in vertebrate evolution. , 1997, Genetics.

[27]  J. Cooke,et al.  Evolutionary origins and maintenance of redundant gene expression during metazoan development. , 1997, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[28]  M. Westerfield,et al.  Relationships among msx gene structure and function in zebrafish and other vertebrates. , 1997, Molecular biology and evolution.

[29]  B. Gaut,et al.  DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Margaret R. Thomson,et al.  Vertebrate genome evolution and the zebrafish gene map , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[31]  R. Krumlauf,et al.  Hoxa1 and Hoxb1 synergize in patterning the hindbrain, cranial nerves and second pharyngeal arch. , 1998, Development.

[32]  H. Ruley,et al.  An Enhancer Element in the EphA2 (Eck) Gene Sufficient for Rhombomere-specific Expression Is Activated by HOXA1 and HOXB1 Homeobox Proteins* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  T. Jukes,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 2000, Genetics.