The use of Grounded Theory and of Arenas / Social Worlds Theory in Discourse Studies : A Case Study on the Discursive Adaptation of Information Systems

This paper exemplifies the combined use of Grounded Theory and of the Arenas/Social Worlds Theory in a study of the discursive interaction amongst middle managers at a UK University administration and academic computing services. This study aimed at exploring the role of discursive interaction and negotiation in the organisational adaptation of information systems, by defining the premises upon which discourses were constructed and deployed on the basis of particular worldviews and how in turn they informed back different worldviews. It presents key lessons learned from this approach in relationship to the roles of codification, of relationships bewtween conceptual categories and between between theoretical influences and empirical work, as well as those emerging from the lived experience of research analysts.

[1]  Simeon Yates,et al.  Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader , 2001 .

[2]  B. Glaser Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[3]  Paul Trowler,et al.  Academics Responding to Change: New Higher Education Frameworks and Academic Cultures , 1998 .

[4]  Paul Trowler,et al.  Captured by the Discourse? The Socially Constitutive Power of New Higher Education Discourse in the UK , 2001 .

[5]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[6]  Mika Kivimäki,et al.  Grounded theory in organizational research , 2004 .

[7]  H. Willmott Managing the Academics: Commodification and Control in the Development of University Education in the U.K. , 1995 .

[8]  C. Cassell,et al.  Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research , 2004 .

[9]  S. Reeves,et al.  Discourse Analysis , 2018, The Study of Language.

[10]  A. Strauss,et al.  Psychiatric Ideologies and Institutions , 1981 .

[11]  B. Glaser Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence Vs. Forcing , 1992 .

[12]  D. Partington Building Grounded Theories of Management Action , 2000 .

[13]  Laurie Cohen,et al.  The Meaning Professionals Give to Management... and Strategy , 2000 .

[14]  Andrew D. Brown Narrative, Politics and Legitimacy in an IT Implimentation , 1998 .

[15]  Laurie Cohen,et al.  Fueling Discovery or Monitoring Productivity: Research Scientists' Changing Perceptions of Management , 1999 .

[16]  Margaret Wetherell,et al.  Unfolding discourse analysis , 2003 .

[17]  J. Maybin Language, struggle and voice: The Bakhtin/Volosinov writings , 2001 .

[18]  I. Dey Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists , 1993 .

[19]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Just How Managed is the McUniversity? Craig Prichard, Hugh Willmott , 1997 .

[20]  Christina Goulding Grounded theory: the missing methodology on the interpretivist agenda , 1998 .

[21]  S. Clegg,et al.  Conceptualising Middle Management in Higher Education: A multifaceted discourse , 2005 .

[22]  Sheffield Hallam,et al.  Management Consultancies and Technology Consultancies in a Converging Market : A Knowledge Management Perspective , 2003 .

[23]  John McAuley,et al.  Exploring Issues in Culture and Competence , 1994 .

[24]  N. King Using interviews in qualitative research , 2004 .

[25]  John McCarthy,et al.  Toward a Dialogical Perspective on Agency , 2004 .