Improving structural brain images acquired with the 3D FLASH sequence.

The three-dimension Fast Low Angle SHot Magnetic Resonance Imaging (3D FLASH) sequence has been widely adopted in medical diagnostic imaging because of its availability, simplicity, and high spatial resolution. To improve the quality of structural brain images acquired with the 3D FLASH sequence, we developed a parameter optimization scheme and image inhomogeneity correction methods. The optimal imaging parameters were determined by maximizing gray-matter and white-matter CNR efficiency. Compared to protocols based on published parameters, applying the proposed optimal imaging parameters increased CNR efficiency by >10%. Image inhomogeneity, including signal and CNR inhomogeneity, was corrected by the choice of an optimal flip angle, estimated transmit function, and estimated receive sensitivity. As a result, our optimization and image inhomogeneity correction greatly improved the quality of images acquired with the 3D FLASH sequence.

[1]  L. Wald,et al.  A wavelet‐based approximation of surface coil sensitivity profiles for correction of image intensity inhomogeneity and parallel imaging reconstruction , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[2]  P. Dechent,et al.  Increased SNR and reduced distortions by averaging multiple gradient echo signals in 3D FLASH imaging of the human brain at 3T , 2009, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[3]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  Steady-State Magnetizations in Rapid NMR Imaging Using Small Flip Angles and Short Repetition Intervals , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  A. Rovira,et al.  Brain volumetry counterparts of cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis , 2009, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[6]  D Louis Collins,et al.  Regional impact of field strength on voxel‐based morphometry results , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[7]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Sensitivity of voxel-based morphometry analysis to choice of imaging protocol at 3 T , 2009, NeuroImage.

[8]  K. Walhovd,et al.  Structural Brain Changes in Aging: Courses, Causes and Cognitive Consequences , 2010, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[9]  Maolin Qiu,et al.  T1 measurements incorporating flip angle calibration and correction in vivo. , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[10]  R P Velthuizen,et al.  MRI segmentation: methods and applications. , 1995, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[11]  Fernando A. Barrios,et al.  Erratum: 3-Dimensional functional imaging of human brain using echo- shifted flash MRI (Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (July) 32:1 (150-155)) , 1994 .

[12]  W R Hendee,et al.  Optimizing tissue contrast in magnetic resonance imaging. , 1984, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  A Haase,et al.  Functional MR imaging of the human brain using FLASH: influence of various imaging parameters. , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[14]  Maolin Qiu,et al.  In vivo method for correcting transmit/receive nonuniformities with phased array coils , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  R M Harrison,et al.  A comparison of two methods for measuring the signal to noise ratio on MR images , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  M. L. Wood,et al.  Spoiling of transverse magnetization in steady‐state sequences , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  N. Thacker,et al.  A fast model independent method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[18]  J P Mugler,et al.  Spoiling of transverse magnetization in gradient‐echo (GRE) imaging during the approach to steady state , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[19]  R. Constable,et al.  Measurement and correction of transmitter and receiver induced nonuniformities in vivo , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Dag Aarsland,et al.  Gray matter atrophy in Parkinson disease with dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies , 2007, Neurology.

[21]  Massimo Filippi,et al.  Multiple sclerosis in 2010: Advances in monitoring and treatment of multiple sclerosis , 2011, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[22]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  A Review of Methods for Correction of Intensity Inhomogeneity in MRI , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  A. Haase,et al.  FLASH imaging: rapid NMR imaging using low flip-angle pulses. 1986. , 1986, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[24]  Gaby S Pell,et al.  MR imaging of epilepsy: state of the art at 1.5 T and potential of 3 T. , 2003, Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape.

[25]  Ralf Deichmann,et al.  Improvement of the image quality of T1-weighted anatomical brain scans , 2006, NeuroImage.

[26]  Hidehiro Watanabe,et al.  Non-uniformity correction of human brain imaging at high field by RF field mapping of B1+ and B1-. , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[27]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  P. Dechent,et al.  Quantitative FLASH MRI at 3T using a rational approximation of the Ernst equation , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.