Inertial Sensing Based Assessment Methods to Quantify the Effectiveness of Post-Stroke Rehabilitation

In clinical settings, traditional stroke rehabilitation evaluation methods are subjectively scored by occupational therapists, and the assessment results vary individually. To address this issue, this study aims to develop a stroke rehabilitation assessment system by using inertial measurement units. The inertial signals from the upper extremities were acquired, from which three quantitative indicators were extracted to reflect rehabilitation performance during stroke patients’ movement examination, i.e., shoulder flexion. Both healthy adults and stroke patients were recruited to correlate the proposed quantitative evaluation indices and traditional rehab assessment scales. Especially, as a unique feature of the study the weight for each of three evaluation indicators was estimated by the least squares method. The quantitative results demonstrate the proposed method accurately reflects patients’ recovery from pre-rehabilitation, and confirm the feasibility of applying inertial signals to evaluate rehab performance through feature extraction. The implemented assessment scheme appears to have the potential to overcome some shortcomings of traditional assessment methods and indicates rehab performance correctly.

[1]  Deva Ramanan,et al.  Robust Tracking of the Upper Limb for Functional Stroke Assessment , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  E. Roth,et al.  Top Ten Things To Know Physical Activity and Exercise Recommendations for Stroke Survivors , 2004 .

[3]  E. Roth,et al.  Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention; the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; the Council on Nutrition, Physical , 2004, Circulation.

[4]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[5]  Donald M. Hilty The American Psychiatric Press Textbook of Geriatric Neuropsychiatry , 1995 .

[6]  G. Harris,et al.  An upper extremity kinematic model for evaluation of hemiparetic stroke. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Réjean Hébert,et al.  Development and Reliability of an Upper Extremity Function Test for the Elderly: The TEMPA , 1993 .

[8]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Web-based telerehabilitation for the upper extremity after stroke , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[9]  Sandra B. Davis,et al.  Effects of Trunk Restraint Combined With Intensive Task Practice on Poststroke Upper Extremity Reach and Function: A Pilot Study , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[10]  Audny Anke,et al.  Arm use in patients with subacute stroke monitored by accelerometry: association with motor impairment and influence on self-dependence. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[11]  M. Goffredo,et al.  A neural tracking and motor control approach to improve rehabilitation of upper limb movements , 2008, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[12]  Alan D. Lopez,et al.  The Global Burden of Disease Study , 2003 .

[13]  Huiru Zheng,et al.  Position-sensing technologies for movement analysis in stroke rehabilitation , 2005, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[14]  Mario Gerla,et al.  StrokeTrack: wireless inertial motion tracking of human arms for stroke telerehabilitation , 2011, mHealthSys '11.

[15]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[16]  Huosheng Hu,et al.  Inertial measurements of upper limb motion , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[17]  V. Feigin,et al.  Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010 , 2014, The Lancet.