Coherence, cohesion and comments on students’ academic essays

Abstract This study investigates the relationships between connectedness in discourse and the in-text comments that tutors write on postgraduate essays at a Thai university. Connectedness was divided into cohesion, propositional coherence and interactional coherence which were analysed using Hoey's lexical analysis [Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press], topical structure analysis and genre analysis respectively. From these analyses, text-level features of connectedness and points in the assignments which are potentially problematic in terms of connectedness were identified, and these were compared against the tutors’ comments. The findings show very little relationship between the analyses of connectedness and the tutors’ comments. The non-results may be due to the constructs of connectedness analysed, the methods of analysis, the data, or the lack of any clear relationship between the tutors’ comments and the quality of the texts as measured by grades.

[1]  J. Lyons.  New horizons in linguistics , 1972 .

[2]  Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse , 1982 .

[3]  F. Daneš.  Functional Sentence Perspective and the Organization of the Text , 1974 .

[4]  Teun A. van Dijk,et al.  Text and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse , 1977 .

[5]  Robert T. Craig,et al.  Conversational coherence : form, structure, and strategy , 1983 .

[6]  Meihua Liu,et al.  Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates , 2005 .

[7]  Icy Lee,et al.  Teaching coherence to ESL students: a classroom inquiry , 2002 .

[8]  John M. Swales,et al.  Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings , 1993 .

[9]  William E. Rutherford,et al.  Second Language Grammar: Learning and Teaching , 1987 .

[10]  Richard Watson Todd,et al.  Measuring the Coherence of Writing Using Topic-Based Analysis. , 2004 .

[11]  Kathleen M. Bailey,et al.  Learning About Language Assessment: Dilemmas, Decisions, and Directions , 1997 .

[12]  G. Yule.  The Study of Language , 1998 .

[13]  Michael Stubbs,et al.  Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic Analysis of Natural Language , 1983 .

[14]  Jonathan Shaw.  A schema approach to the formal literature review in engineering theses , 1995 .

[15]  K. Nwogu,et al.  Structure of science popularizations: A genre-analysis approach to the schema of popularized medical texts , 1991 .

[16]  Michael Halliday,et al.  Cohesion in English , 1976 .

[17]  M. Halliday.  NOTES ON TRANSITIVITY AND THEME IN ENGLISH. PART 2 , 1967 .

[18]  János S. Petöfi,et al.  Micro and macro connexity of texts , 1983 .

[19]  Ulla Connor,et al.  Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-Cultural Aspects of Second Language Writing , 1998 .

[20]  Ulla Connor,et al.  Analyzing Topical Structure in ESL Essays , 1990, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[21]  Susan Thompson,et al.  Frameworks and contexts: A genre-based approach to analysing lecture introductions , 1994 .

[22]  Michael Hoey,et al.  Patterns of Lexis In Text , 1991 .

[23]  Richard Watson Todd,et al.  Giving feedback on journals , 2001 .

[24]  G. Redeker.  Ideational and pragmatic markers of discourse structure , 1990 .

[25]  F. Daneš,et al.  Papers on functional sentence perspective , 1974 .

[26]  Richard Kern,et al.  Literacy and Language Teaching , 2000 .

[27]  Henry Widdowson.  Teaching language as communication , 1978 .

[28]  Ulla Connor,et al.  Second Language Writing: The teaching of topical structure analysis as a revision strategy for ESL writers , 1990 .

[29]  Richard Watson Todd.  Topics in classroom discourse , 2003 .

[30]  Richard Watson Todd,et al.  Topic-based analysis of classroom discourse , 1998 .

[31]  Cynthia Low Pik Ching.  Giving Feedback on Written Work. , 1991 .

[32]  Ulla Connor,et al.  Coherence in Writing: Research and Pedagogical Perspectives , 1990 .