The Doors of Social Robot Perception: The Influence of Implicit Self-theories

[1]  Ryan W. Wohleber,et al.  Evolution and revolution: Personality research for the coming world of robots, artificial intelligence, and autonomous systems , 2021, Personality and Individual Differences.

[2]  G. Letendre,et al.  Robots for Future Classrooms: A Cross-Cultural Validation Study of “Negative Attitudes Toward Robots Scale” in the U.S. Context , 2020, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[3]  Timothy Hinks,et al.  Fear of Robots and Life Satisfaction , 2020, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[4]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  Robots, Jobs, Taxes, and Responsibilities , 2017, Philosophical Studies Series.

[5]  Bing Cai Kok,et al.  Trust in Robots: Challenges and Opportunities , 2020, Current Robotics Reports.

[6]  F. Eyssel,et al.  The Influence of Robot Number on Robot Group Perception—A Call for Action , 2020 .

[7]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Investigating family perceptions and design preferences for an in-home robot , 2020, IDC.

[8]  Elizabeth Solberg,et al.  Digital Mindsets: Recognizing and Leveraging Individual Beliefs for Digital Transformation , 2020, California Management Review.

[9]  Sam Thellman,et al.  Half Day Workshop on Mental Models of Robots , 2020, HRI.

[10]  Helen F. Hastie,et al.  Robots in the Danger Zone: Exploring Public Perception through Engagement , 2020, 2020 15th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[11]  Malene Flensborg Damholdt,et al.  Towards a new scale for assessing attitudes towards social robots , 2020 .

[12]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Evaluating People's Perceptions of Trust in a Robot in a Repeated Interactions Study , 2020, ICSR.

[13]  Martina Mara,et al.  The uncanny of mind in a machine: Humanoid robots as tools, agents, and experiencers , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Peter M. Gollwitzer,et al.  Mindset Theory of Action Phases , 2020, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[15]  Sarah C. Kucker,et al.  An MTurk Crisis? Shifts in Data Quality and the Impact on Study Results , 2019, Social Psychological and Personality Science.

[16]  B. Han,et al.  To Collaborate or Serve? Effects of Anthropomorphized Brand Roles and Implicit Theories on Consumer Responses , 2020, Cornell Hospitality Quarterly.

[17]  So young Lee,et al.  Does mindset matter for using social networking sites?: understanding motivations for and uses of Instagram with growth versus fixed mindset , 2019, International Journal of Advertising.

[18]  Aaron J. Moss,et al.  Tapped out or barely tapped? Recommendations for how to harness the vast and largely unused potential of the Mechanical Turk participant pool , 2019, PloS one.

[19]  Duane M. Nagel,et al.  The impact of implicit self-theories and loss salience on financial risk , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[20]  Kun Xu,et al.  First encounter with robot Alpha: How individual differences interact with vocal and kinetic cues in users’ social responses , 2019, New Media Soc..

[21]  Umit Morsunbul.  Human-robot interaction: How do personality traits affect attitudes towards robot? , 2019, Journal of Human Sciences.

[22]  Heather L. Urry,et al.  Children's Responding to Humanlike Agents Reflects an Uncanny Valley , 2019, 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[23]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  Why Would I Use This in My Home? A Model of Domestic Social Robot Acceptance , 2019, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[24]  Ronnel B. King,et al.  Are your emotions under your control or not? Implicit theories of emotion predict well-being via cognitive reappraisal , 2019, Personality and Individual Differences.

[25]  Dipankar Rai,et al.  The influence of implicit self-theories on consumer financial decision making , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[26]  C. Dweck,et al.  Mindsets: A View From Two Eras , 2019, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[27]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  Involve the user! Changing attitudes toward robots by user participation in a robot prototyping process , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[28]  Bethany S. Jurs,et al.  How serious is the ‘carelessness’ problem on Mechanical Turk? , 2019, International Journal of Social Research Methodology.

[29]  Markus Appel,et al.  Are robots becoming unpopular? Changes in attitudes towards autonomous robotic systems in Europe , 2018, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  S. Jain,et al.  Consumer psychology of implicit theories: A review and agenda , 2019 .

[31]  A. Hafeez,et al.  Promoting upskilling: How a situational growth mindset increases consumers’ adoption of really new products , 2019 .

[32]  Jesse J. Chandler,et al.  Common Concerns with MTurk as a Participant Pool: Evidence and Solutions , 2018 .

[33]  Emanuele Menegatti,et al.  Sex differences in expectations and perception of a social robot , 2018, 2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO).

[34]  Jasmin Bernotat,et al.  Can(‘t) Wait to Have a Robot at Home? - Japanese and German Users' Attitudes Toward Service Robots in Smart Homes , 2018, 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[35]  Jessica M. Szczuka,et al.  Do a robot’s social skills and its objection discourage interactants from switching the robot off? , 2018, PloS one.

[36]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  The impact of peoples’ personal dispositions and personalities on their trust of robots in an emergency scenario , 2018, Paladyn J. Behav. Robotics.

[37]  Robin A. Coulter,et al.  The Fresh Start Mindset: Transforming Consumers’ Lives , 2018 .

[38]  P. Nokelainen,et al.  Innovativeness of Staff in Higher Education: "Do Implicit Theories and Goal Orientations Matter?". , 2018 .

[39]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Developing Brand Relationships after a Brand Transgression: The Role of Implicit Theories of Relationships , 2018, Journal of the Association for Consumer Research.

[40]  Rob Law,et al.  The Mechanism that Links the Implicit Theories of Intelligence and Continuance of Information Technology: Evidence from the Use of Mobile Apps to Make Hotel Reservations , 2018, ENTER.

[41]  Joshua A. Tucker,et al.  Everyone On Mechanical Turk is Above a Threshold of Digital Literacy : Sampling Strategies for Studying Digital Media Effects ∗ , 2018 .

[42]  Mauricio Palmeira,et al.  Customers' reactions to technological products: The impact of implicit theories of intelligence , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  Kyla Haimovitz,et al.  The Origins of Children's Growth and Fixed Mindsets: New Research and a New Proposal. , 2017, Child development.

[44]  Fengxiang Wang,et al.  The Dark Side of Malleability: Incremental Theory Promotes Immoral Behaviors , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[45]  Virginia Contreras,et al.  The public's perception of humanlike robots: Online social commentary reflects an appearance-based uncanny valley, a general fear of a “Technology Takeover”, and the unabashed sexualization of female-gendered robots , 2017, 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[46]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Can we control it? Autonomous robots threaten human identity, uniqueness, safety, and resources , 2017, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[47]  Yuhua Liang,et al.  Fear of Autonomous Robots and Artificial Intelligence: Evidence from National Representative Data with Probability Sampling , 2017, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[48]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Investigating Human Perceptions of Trust in Robots for Safe HRI in Home Environments , 2017, HRI.

[49]  Alan R. Wagner,et al.  Effect of Robot Performance on Human–Robot Trust in Time-Critical Situations , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems.

[50]  John B. Ford.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A Comment , 2017 .

[51]  K. Sheehan,et al.  An Analysis of Data Quality: Professional Panels, Student Subject Pools, and Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2017 .

[52]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  An experimental psychological perspective on social robotics , 2017, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[53]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  The interactive effects of robot anthropomorphism and robot ability on perceived threat and support for robotics research , 2016 .

[54]  Francesco Ferrari,et al.  Blurring Human–Machine Distinctions: Anthropomorphic Appearance in Social Robots as a Threat to Human Distinctiveness , 2016, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[55]  Michael Horowitz,et al.  Public opinion and the politics of the killer robots debate , 2016 .

[56]  C. Dweck,et al.  Mindsets and consumer psychology: : A response , 2016 .

[57]  Mary C. Murphy,et al.  Mindsets shape consumer behavior , 2016 .

[58]  D. Maheswaran,et al.  Consumer mindsets and self-enhancement: Signaling versus learning , 2016 .

[59]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  Growing beyond growth: Why multiple mindsets matter for consumer behavior , 2016 .

[60]  Kristin E. Schaefer,et al.  Measuring Trust in Human Robot Interactions: Development of the “ Trust Perception Scale-HRI ” , 2016 .

[61]  S. C. Wheeler,et al.  Potential growth areas for implicit theories research , 2016 .

[62]  R. Petty,et al.  A research dialogue on mindsets , 2016 .

[63]  Maurice E. Schweitzer,et al.  Perceptions of High Integrity Can Persist After Deception: How Implicit Beliefs Moderate Trust Erosion , 2015 .

[64]  Daisuke Suzuki,et al.  Development of the Multi-dimensional Robot Attitude Scale: Constructs of People's Attitudes Towards Domestic Robots , 2015, ICSR.

[65]  D. Tingley,et al.  “Who are these people?” Evaluating the demographic characteristics and political preferences of MTurk survey respondents , 2015 .

[66]  F. Eyssel,et al.  Learning with Educational Companion Robots? Toward Attitudes on Education Robots, Predictors of Attitudes, and Application Potentials for Education Robots , 2015, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[67]  Thomas Kramer,et al.  Do Materialists Prefer the “Brand-as-Servant”? The Interactive Effect of Anthropomorphized Brand Roles and Materialism on Consumer Responses , 2015 .

[68]  Maartje M. A. de Graaf,et al.  Sharing a life with Harvey: Exploring the acceptance of and relationship-building with a social robot , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[69]  Eduardo Benítez Sandoval,et al.  Human Robot Interaction and Fiction: A Contradiction , 2014, ICSR.

[70]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  Perception of an Android Robot in Japan and Australia: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 2014, ICSR.

[71]  de M.M.A. Graaf,et al.  Long-term evaluation of a social robot in real homes , 2014, HRI 2014.

[72]  G. Oettingen,et al.  Implicit theories and motivational focus: Desired future versus present reality , 2014 .

[73]  Jesse Chandler,et al.  Risks and Rewards of Crowdsourcing Marketplaces , 2014, Handbook of Human Computation.

[74]  C. Dweck,et al.  Beliefs About Emotion: Links to Emotion Regulation, Well-Being, and Psychological Distress , 2013 .

[75]  D. Maheswaran,et al.  The influence of implicit theories and message frame on the persuasiveness of disease prevention and detection advocacies , 2013 .

[76]  E. M. Tong,et al.  The relation between implicit theories of personality and forgiveness , 2013 .

[77]  Chang-Hyun Jin,et al.  The effects of individual innovativeness on users' adoption of Internet content filtering software and attitudes toward children's Internet use , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[78]  Eric M. VanEpps,et al.  Mind-sets matter: a meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[79]  D. Wegner,et al.  Feeling robots and human zombies: Mind perception and the uncanny valley , 2012, Cognition.

[80]  F. Eyssel,et al.  (S)he's Got the Look: Gender Stereotyping of Robots1 , 2012 .

[81]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Capitalizing on brand personalities in advertising: The influence of implicit self‐theories on ad appeal effectiveness , 2012 .

[82]  Erfassung von Technikbereitschaft,et al.  Entwicklung und Validierung einer Kurzskala zur Erfassung von Technikbereitschaft , 2012 .

[83]  Friederike Eyssel,et al.  ‘If you sound like me, you must be more human’: On the interplay of robot and user features on human-robot acceptance and anthropomorphism , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[84]  Eran Halperin,et al.  Promoting the Middle East Peace Process by Changing Beliefs About Group Malleability , 2011, Science.

[85]  V. Quintanilla.  Judicial Mindsets: The Social Psychology of Implicit Theories and the Law , 2011 .

[86]  Carsten Zoll,et al.  The Social Role of Robots in the Future—Explorative Measurement of Hopes and Fears , 2011, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[87]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  The new ontological category hypothesis in human-robot interaction , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[88]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Got to Get You Into My Life: Do Brand Personalities Rub Off on Consumers? , 2011 .

[89]  Stephanie M. Carlson,et al.  Behaving as or behaving as if? Children's conceptions of personified robots and the emergence of a new ontological category , 2010, Neural Networks.

[90]  M. Schweitzer,et al.  How Implicit Beliefs Influence Trust Recovery , 2010, Psychological science.

[91]  Joseph C. Nunes,et al.  The Malleable Brand: The Role of Implicit Theories in Evaluating Brand Extensions , 2010 .

[92]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Age and gender factors in user acceptance of healthcare robots , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[93]  Y. Stephan,et al.  Coping with examinations: exploring relationships between students' coping strategies, implicit theories of ability, and perceived control. , 2009, The British journal of educational psychology.

[94]  Tai-Kong Kam.  Implicit Theories and the Trust Repair Process , 2009 .

[95]  Pierre Blazevic,et al.  Mechatronic design of NAO humanoid , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[96]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  Age differences and images of robots: Social survey in Japan , 2009 .

[97]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Preferences and perceptions of robot appearance and embodiment in human-robot interaction trials , 2009 .

[98]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  What do people expect from robots? , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[99]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: What everyday people think robots should do , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[100]  Charles R. Crowell,et al.  Robot social presence and gender: Do females view robots differently than males? , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[101]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Is a robot an appliance, teammate, or friend? age-related differences in expectations of and attitudes towards personal home-based robots , 2008 .

[102]  K. Stecher,et al.  Unexpected improvement, decline, and stasis: a prediction confidence perspective on achievement success and failure. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[103]  James J Gross,et al.  Implicit theories of emotion: affective and social outcomes across a major life transition. , 2007, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

[104]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Methodology & Themes of Human-Robot Interaction: A Growing Research Field , 2007 .

[105]  Lisa S. Blackwell,et al.  Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: a longitudinal study and an intervention. , 2007, Child development.

[106]  Tatsuya Nomura,et al.  The influence of people’s culture and prior experiences with Aibo on their attitude towards robots , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.

[107]  Jennifer A. Mangels,et al.  Why do beliefs about intelligence influence learning success? A social cognitive neuroscience model. , 2006, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[108]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Task Structure and User Attributes as Elements of Human-Robot Interaction Design , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[109]  Daniel C Molden,et al.  Finding "meaning" in psychology: a lay theories approach to self-regulation, social perception, and social development. , 2006, The American psychologist.

[110]  C. Dweck.  Mindset: The New Psychology of Success , 2006 .

[111]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler? , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[112]  Peter A. Heslin,et al.  The effect of implicit person theory on performance appraisals. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[113]  C. Mariné,et al.  Implicit Theories of Intelligence, Goal Orientation, Cognitive Engagement, and Achievement: A Test of Dweck's Model with Returning to School Adults. , 2005 .

[114]  Y. Trope,et al.  The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others' self-regulatory efforts ☆ , 2004 .

[115]  T. Kanda,et al.  Psychology in human-robot communication: an attempt through investigation of negative attitudes and anxiety toward robots , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[116]  Aaron Powers,et al.  Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation , 2003, The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003. Proceedings. ROMAN 2003..

[117]  Brian R. Duffy,et al.  Anthropomorphism and the social robot , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[118]  Heather Patrick,et al.  Implicit Theories of Relationships: Orientations Toward Evaluation and Cultivation , 2003, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[119]  R. Robins,et al.  Implicit Self-Theories in the Academic Domain: Implications for Goal Orientation, Attributions, Affect, and Self-Esteem Change , 2002 .

[120]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. , 2002, Psychological review.

[121]  C. Dweck,et al.  Person theories and attention allocation: preferences for stereotypic versus counterstereotypic information. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[122]  J. Perner,et al.  From an implicit to an explicit "theory of mind" , 2000 .

[123]  C. Dweck,et al.  Implicit theories, attributions, and coping : A meaning system approach , 1999 .

[124]  C. Dweck.  Self-theoriestheir role in motivation, personality, and development , 1999 .

[125]  C. Dweck,et al.  Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. , 1998 .

[126]  C. Dweck,et al.  Trait- Versus Process-Focused Social Judgment , 1998 .

[127]  C. Knee.  Implicit theories of relationships: Assessment and prediction of romantic relationship initiation, coping, and longevity. , 1998 .

[128]  Terry E. Duncan,et al.  Approaches to Testing Interaction Effects Using Structural Equation Modeling Methodology. , 1998, Multivariate behavioral research.

[129]  C. Dweck,et al.  Implicit theories and conceptions of morality , 1997 .

[130]  C. Dweck,et al.  Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[131]  C. Dweck,et al.  Implicit Theories and Evaluative Processes in Person Cognition , 1997 .

[132]  C. Dweck,et al.  Relations among children's social goals, implicit personality theories, and responses to social failure. , 1997, Developmental psychology.

[133]  C. Dweck,et al.  Implicit Theories: Elaboration and Extension of the Model , 1995 .

[134]  Josef Perner,et al.  Implicit Understanding of Belief , 1994 .

[135]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[136]  C. Dweck,et al.  A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality , 1988 .

[137]  C. Dweck,et al.  Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[138]  Jessica L. Tracy,et al.  The effects of goal progress cues : An implicit theory perspective , 2022 .