Communication Styles of Interactive Tools for Self-Improvement

BackgroundInteractive products for self-improvement (e.g., online trainings to reduce stress, fitness gadgets) have become increasingly popular among consumers and healthcare providers. In line with the idea of positive computing, these tools aim to support their users on their way to improved well-being and human flourishing. As an interdisciplinary domain, the design of self-improvement technologies requires psychological, technological, and design expertise. One needs to know how to support people in behavior change, and one needs to find ways to do this through technology design. However, as recent reviews show, the interlocking relationship between these disciplines is still improvable. Many existing technologies for self-improvement neglect psychological theory on behavior change, especially motivational factors are not sufficiently considered. To counteract this, we suggest a focus on the dialog and emerging communication between product and user, considering the self-improvement tool as an interactive coach and advisor.MethodsThe present qualitative interview study (N = 18) explored the user experience of self-improvement technologies. A special focus was on the perceived dialog between tool and user, which we analyzed in terms of models from communication psychology.ResultsOur findings show that users are sensible to the way the product “speaks to them” and consider this as essential for their experience and successful change. Analysis revealed different communication styles of self-improvement tools (e.g., helpful-cooperative, rational-distanced, critical-aggressive), each linked to specific emotional consequences.ConclusionsThese findings form one starting point for a more psychologically founded design of self-improvement technology. On a more general level, our approach aims to contribute to a better integration of psychological and technological knowledge, and in consequence, supporting users on their way to enhanced well-being.

[1]  Yvonne de Kort,et al.  Persuasive Technology for Human Well-Being: Setting the Scene , 2006, PERSUASIVE.

[2]  Kathrin M. Möslein,et al.  Innovation practices and their boundary-crossing mechanisms: a review and proposals for the future , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[3]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Using Robots to Moderate Team Conflict: The Case of Repairing Violations , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[4]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do , 2002, UBIQ.

[5]  L. Rosenstiel,et al.  Führung von Mitarbeitern : Handbuch für erfolgreiches Personalmanagement , 1993 .

[6]  D. Lehr,et al.  Internetbasierte Ansätze in der Prävention und Behandlung von depressiven Beschwerden bei Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen , 2014 .

[7]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  An overview of intentional change from a complexity perspective , 2006 .

[8]  Jan P.L. Schoormans,et al.  Product personality in physical interaction , 2008 .

[9]  Christine L. Lisetti,et al.  Affect and Wellbeing: Introduction to Special Section , 2014, IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput..

[10]  Robbert-Jan Beun,et al.  Persuasive strategies in mobile insomnia therapy: alignment, adaptation, and motivational support , 2013, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[11]  Karl Rihaczek,et al.  Positive computing , 2016, Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD.

[12]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Computers are social actors , 1994, CHI '94.

[13]  P. Alex Linley,et al.  Enhancing goal self-concordance through coaching , 2007, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[14]  Robbert-Jan Beun,et al.  Improving Adherence in Automated e-Coaching - A Case from Insomnia Therapy , 2016, PERSUASIVE.

[15]  R. Calvo,et al.  Promoting Psychological Wellbeing: Loftier Goals for New Technologies [Opinion] , 2013, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[16]  P. Mayring Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution , 2014 .

[17]  Anna E. Pohlmeyer,et al.  Positive design : An introduction to design for subjective well-being , 2013 .

[18]  F. S. V. Thun Stile,werte und personlichkeitsentwicklung : Differentielle psychologie der kommunikation , 1981 .

[19]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  Effects of communication style and culture on ability to accept recommendations from robots , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[20]  D. Conroy,et al.  Behavior change techniques in top-ranked mobile apps for physical activity. , 2014, American journal of preventive medicine.

[21]  Heleen Riper,et al.  Log in and breathe out: internet-based recovery training for sleepless employees with work-related strain - results of a randomized controlled trial. , 2015, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[22]  Jürgen Ziegler,et al.  Supporting Users in Setting Effective Goals in Activity Tracking , 2016, PERSUASIVE.

[23]  Andreas Witzel The Problem-centered Interview , 2000 .

[24]  Willem-Paul Brinkman,et al.  Designing technologies that encourage the sharing of positive emotions , 2010 .

[25]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Can computer personalities be human personalities? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[26]  Y. Behar,et al.  Positive Design: An Introduction to Design for Subjective Well-Being , 2014 .

[27]  F. L. Ruch,et al.  Psychology and Life , 2001 .

[28]  Sarah Diefenbach,et al.  Exploring relationships between interaction attributes and experience , 2013, DPPI.

[29]  Ben Matthews,et al.  Easy doesn’t do it: skill and expression in tangible aesthetics , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.