Spaces for interactive engagement or technology for differential academic participation? Google Groups for collaborative learning at a South African University

The rhetoric on the potential of Web 2.0 technologies to democratize online engagement of students often overlooks the discomforting, differential participation and asymmetrical engagement that accompanies student adoption of emerging technologies. This paper, therefore, constitutes a critical reality check for student adoption of technology to the extent that it explores the potential of Google Groups (i.e. self-organised online groups) to leverage collaborative engagement and balanced participation of students with minimal educator support. Community of Inquiry and a case study approach involving in-depth interviews with racially mixed students and Google Group artifacts were drawn upon as theoretical and methodological lenses for examining the equality of participation, academic rigor and complexity of engagement in Google Groups. Study findings were mixed: a semblance of authentic peer-based engagements, emergent academic networking, and inter-racial communication in Google Groups was juxtaposed with gender asymmetries in participation, dominance of group administrators’ postings and shallow collaborative engagements. The study, therefore, recommends actively engaged Group leaders who steer gender and racially balanced engagements, scaffold peer on-task behavior; including a sound pedagogical strategy anchored in collaborative problem-solving; authentic construction of knowledge; effective completion of collaborative tasks by students; and constructive assessments by the educator and peers.

[1]  James J. Appleton,et al.  Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. , 2008 .

[2]  Kel Jackson,et al.  What value assessment rubrics in shaping students' engagement in asynchronous online discussions? , 2010 .

[3]  Giuseppe Labianca,et al.  Network-building behavioral tendencies, range, and promotion speed , 2014, Soc. Networks.

[4]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Listening for Silence in Text‐Based, Online Encounters , 2007 .

[5]  Joanne M. McInnerney,et al.  Seven Problems of Online Group Learning (and Their Solutions) , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[6]  Heather P Libbey,et al.  Measuring student relationships to school: attachment, bonding, connectedness, and engagement. , 2004, The Journal of school health.

[7]  N. Laubenthal What Did You Do in School Today , 1979 .

[8]  Victoria I. Marín,et al.  A design of a postgraduate course on Google Apps based on an Institutional Personal Learning Environment (iPLE) , 2011 .

[9]  Robin J. Fogarty,et al.  Educating teachers for higher order thinking: The three‐story intellect , 1993 .

[10]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[11]  Anthony G. Picciano BEYOND STUDENT PERCEPTIONS: ISSUES OF INTERACTION, PRESENCE, AND PERFORMANCE IN AN ONLINE COURSE , 2019, Online Learning.

[12]  Irina Maslo,et al.  E-Learning for widening participation in higher education , 2014 .

[13]  Sharon Friesen,et al.  What Did You Do in School Today? Transforming Classrooms through Social, Academic, and Intellectual Engagement. (First National Report). , 2009 .

[14]  Gudrun Oberprieler,et al.  Encouraging equitable online participation through curriculum articulation , 2004, Comput. Educ..

[15]  D. Garrison ONLINE COMMUNITY OF INQUIRY REVIEW: SOCIAL, COGNITIVE, AND TEACHING PRESENCE ISSUES , 2019, Online Learning.

[16]  Gary Natriello,et al.  Achieving Educational Excellence: A Critical Assessment of Priorities and Practices in Higher Education , 1985 .

[17]  J. Finn Withdrawing From School , 1989 .

[18]  J. Creswell,et al.  Qualitative Research Designs , 2007 .

[19]  Audley Harris Using Google Groups in the Classroom: A Case Study , 2011 .

[21]  Jirí Srba An experiment with using Google tools for project supervision at tertiary education , 2010, CompSysTech '10.

[22]  Erman Yükseltürk,et al.  Exploring the link among entry characteristics, participation behaviors and course outcomes of online learners: An examination of learner profile using cluster analysis , 2013, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[23]  Maged N Kamel Boulos,et al.  The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. , 2007, Health information and libraries journal.

[24]  L. Smith-Lovin,et al.  Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. , 1987 .

[25]  Challenge of engagement inside and outside the classroom : the future for universities , 2010 .

[26]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  What Happens When Teachers Design Educational Technology? The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2005 .

[27]  Keith Wetzel,et al.  Professional Development 2.0 , 2010 .

[28]  A. Astin What matters in college? : four critical years revisited , 1994 .

[29]  L. Bécares,et al.  Understanding the Influence of Race/Ethnicity, Gender, and Class on Inequalities in Academic and Non-Academic Outcomes among Eighth-Grade Students: Findings from an Intersectionality Approach , 2015, PloS one.

[30]  Avner Caspi,et al.  Sharing and Collaborating with Google Docs: The influence of Psychological Ownership, Responsibility, and Student's Attitudes on Outcome Quality , 2009 .

[31]  Daniel A. McFarland,et al.  Influence flows in the academy: Using affiliation networks to assess peer effects among researchers , 2011 .

[32]  R. Weaver,et al.  Classroom Organization and Participation: College Students' Perceptions , 2005 .

[33]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[34]  Askin Asan,et al.  The Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Technology Enhanced Collaborative Learning Environment , 2006 .

[35]  Christine McDonald,et al.  Adjusting the community of inquiry approach to a synchronous mathematical context , 2008 .

[36]  Luis Borges Gouveia,et al.  Comparing Google Groups Use by Evaluating Flow Experience and Generated Messages in Laptop and Desktop Higher Education Students , 2011 .

[37]  S. Brookfield,et al.  Discussion as a Way of Teaching: Tools and Techniques for Democratic Classrooms , 1999 .

[38]  Christopher M. Hovey The Affect of Environmental Web-design on Student Perceptions of Social Presence in Online Learning Communities , 2014 .

[39]  Poh Yen Ng,et al.  Adaptation of Google group for online teaching and learning , 2008 .

[40]  George D. Kuh,et al.  Being (Dis)Engaged in Educationally Purposeful Activities: The Influences of Student and Institutional Characteristics , 2002 .

[41]  B. Turner Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) , 2001 .

[42]  Marjorie B. Platt,et al.  Class Participation inAccounting Courses: FactorsThatAffect Student Comfort and Learning , 2010 .

[43]  荒牧 草平,et al.  Modeling the Processes Generating Class Differences in Educational Attainment , 2011 .

[44]  Mark Guzdial,et al.  Situating CoWeb: a scholarship of application , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[45]  Barbara Lockee,et al.  Building modern online social presence: A review of social presence theory and its instructional design implications for future trends , 2012, Education and Information Technologies.

[46]  A. Sfard On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One , 1998 .

[47]  Marjorie B. Platt,et al.  Nonvoluntary Class Participation in Graduate Discussion Courses: Effects of Grading and Cold Calling , 2006 .

[48]  Said Hadjerrouit,et al.  Collaborative Writing with Web 2.0 Technologies: Education Students' Perceptions , 2011, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Innov. Pract..

[49]  S. Feld Social Structural Determinants of Similarity among Associates , 1982 .

[50]  Suzanne Martin,et al.  Better Together: The Trail User Participation Toolkit for Living Labs , 2012 .

[51]  Colla J. MacDonald,et al.  Community building, emergent design and expecting the unexpected: Creating a quality eLearning experience , 2005, Internet High. Educ..

[52]  David Jones,et al.  Indicators of engagement , 2010 .

[53]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Students' Use of Asynchronous Voice Discussion in a Blended-Learning Environment: A Study of Two Undergraduate Classes. , 2012 .

[54]  J. Willms,et al.  Student engagement at school : a sense of belonging and participation : results from PISA 2000 , 2003 .

[55]  Yigal Rosen,et al.  Complexity of Social Interactions in Collaborative Learning: The Case of Online Database Environment , 2010 .

[56]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  ASSESSING TEACHING PRESENCE IN A COMPUTER CONFERENCING CONTEXT , 2019, Online Learning.

[57]  Wei Chen,et al.  Participation Maximization Based on Social Influence in Online Discussion Forums , 2011, ICWSM.

[58]  S. Bennett,et al.  The adaptation of Chinese international students to online flexible learning: two case studies , 2008 .

[59]  Daniel J. McGrath,et al.  Student Content Engagement as a Construct for the Measurement of Effective Classroom Instruction and Teacher Knowledge , 2005 .

[60]  P. Burnard A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. , 1991, Nurse education today.

[61]  Zehra Akyol,et al.  Role of instructional technology in the transformation of higher education , 2009, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[62]  Laura Shackelford,et al.  Early Modern Humans and Morphological Variation in Southeast Asia: Fossil Evidence from Tam Pa Ling, Laos , 2015, PloS one.

[63]  P. Albion,et al.  Momentum in online discussions: the effect of social presence on motivation for participation , 2005 .

[64]  Andri Ioannou,et al.  Incorporating Wikis in an Educational Technology Course: Ideas, Reflections and Lessons Learned … , 2008 .

[65]  Prashant Kumar Astalin,et al.  Qualitative Research Designs: A Conceptual Framework , 2013 .

[66]  C. Greenwood,et al.  Teacher- versus peer-mediated instruction: an ecobehavioral analysis of achievement outcomes. , 1984, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[67]  Robert R. Weaver,et al.  Classroom Organization and Participation: College Students' Perceptions , 2005 .

[68]  B. Taye Online discussion for block teaching in postgraduate health professionals’ curriculum: the Ethiopian experience , 2014, BMC medical education.