Success criteria and adaptive management for a large-scale wetland restoration project

We are using a 20+ year photographic history of relatively undisturbed and formerly diked sites to predict the restoration trajectories and equilibrium size of a 4,050 ha salt marsh on Delaware Bay, New Jersey (USA). The project was initiated to offset the loss of finfishes from once-through cooling at a local power plant. We used a simple food chain model to estimate the required restoration size. This model assumed that annual macrophyte detritus production and benthic algal production resulted in production of finfishes, including certain species of local interest. Because the marsh surface and intertidal drainage system are used by many finfishes and are the focal points for exchange of detrital materials, the restoration planning focused on both vegetational and hydrogeomorphological parameters. Recolonization bySpartina spp. and other desirable taxa will be promoted by returning a natural hydroperiod and drainage configuration to two types of degraded salt marsh: diked salt hay (Spartina patens) farms and brackish marsh dominated byPhragmites australis. The criteria for success of the project address two questions: What is the “bound of expectation” for restoration success, and how long will it take to get there? Measurements to be made are macrophyte production, vegetation composition, benthic algal production, and drainage features including stream order, drainage density, channel length, bifurcation ratios and sinuosity. A method for combining these individual parameters into a single success index is also presented. Finally, we developed adaptive management thresholds and corrective measures to guide the restoration process.

[1]  L. Rozas,et al.  Intertidal rivulets and creekbanks: corridors between tidal creeks and marshes , 1988 .

[2]  M. Turner,et al.  LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY : The Effect of Pattern on Process 1 , 2002 .

[3]  E. Odum.  THE STATUS OF THREE ECOSYSTEM-LEVEL HYPOTHESES REGARDING SALT MARSH ESTUARIES: TIDAL SUBSIDY, OUTWELLING, AND DETRITUS-BASED FOOD CHAINS , 1980 .

[4]  J. Dean,et al.  Temporal variation in the utilization of an intertidal creek by the bay anchovy (Anchoa mitchilli) , 1981 .

[5]  R. Forman.  Ecologically Sustainable Landscapes: The Role of Spatial Configuration , 1990 .

[6]  W. Niering,et al.  Restoration of an impounded salt marsh in New England , 1990 .

[7]  R. Kneib.  Flume weir for quantitative collection of nekton from vegetated intertidal habitats , 1991 .

[8]  R. Cain,et al.  Annual occurrence, abundance and diversity of fish in a South Carolina intertidal creek , 1976 .

[9]  Mary E. Kentula,et al.  An Approach to Improving Decision-Making in Wetland Restoration and Creation , 1992 .

[10]  W. Hettler.  Nekton use of regularly-flooded salt-marsh cordgrass habitat in North Carolina, USA , 1989 .

[11]  R. Rountree,et al.  Fauna of polyhaline subtidal marsh creeks in Southern New Jersey: Composition, abundance and biomass , 1992 .

[12]  S. L. Weiss,et al.  Multiple determinants of community structure in shallow marsh habitats, Cape Fear River estuary, North Carolina, USA , 1980 .

[13]  S. Woo,et al.  Estuarine Influences on a Continental Shelf Plankton Community , 1979, Science.

[14]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  COMMUNITY AND TROPHIC ORGANIZATION OF NEKTON UTILIZING SHALLOW MARSH HABITATS, YORK RIVER, VIRGINIA 1 , 1984 .

[15]  Aaron M. Ellison,et al.  Determinants of Pattern in a New England Salt Marsh Plant Community , 1987 .

[16]  Ken D. Bovee,et al.  A guide to stream habitat analysis using the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology. IFIP No. 12 , 1982 .

[17]  W. Niering,et al.  Salt marsh vegetation change in response to tidal restriction , 1984 .

[18]  M. Weinstein.  Shallow marsh habitats as primary nurseries for fishes and shellfish, Cape Fear River, North Carolina. , 1979 .

[19]  J. Dean,et al.  The utilization of an intertidal salt marsh creek by larval and juvenile fishes: Abundance, diversity and temporal variation , 1979 .

[20]  Linda A. Deegan,et al.  Nutrient and energy transport between estuaries and coastal marine ecosystems by fish migration , 1993 .

[21]  R. Hodson,et al.  Food Habits of Young Spots in Nursery Areas of the Cape Fear River Estuary, North Carolina , 1981 .

[22]  S. Szedlmayer,et al.  Population dynamics of spot,leiostomus xanthurus, in polyhaline tidal creeks of the York River estuary, Virginia , 1984 .

[23]  National Research Council,et al.  Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems. , 1993 .

[24]  E. Haines.  Interactions between Georgia Salt Marshes and Coastal Waters: A Changing Paradigm , 1979 .

[25]  F. Fosberg.  The Salt‐Marsh Ecosystem , 1961 .

[26]  W. Odum,et al.  Food, Predation Risk, and Microhabitat Selection in a Marsh Fish Assemblage , 1988 .

[27]  Scott W. Nixon,et al.  Between Coastal Marshes and Coastal Waters — A Review of Twenty Years of Speculation and Research on the Role of Salt Marshes in Estuarine Productivity and Water Chemistry , 1980 .

[28]  J. Teal.  Energy Flow in the Salt Marsh Ecosystem of Georgia , 1962 .

[29]  R. E. Turner,et al.  Dependence of fishery species on salt marshes: The role of food and refuge , 1984 .

[30]  J. Shisler,et al.  Avian utilisation of a tidally restored salt hay farm , 1983 .