Maximum Likelihood Detection With Ligand Receptors for Diffusion-Based Molecular Communications in Internet of Bio-Nano Things

Molecular Communication (MC) is a bio-inspired communication technique that uses molecules as a method of information transfer among nanoscale devices. MC receiver is an essential component having profound impact on the communication system performance. However, the interaction of the receiver with information bearing molecules has been usually oversimplified in modeling the reception process and developing signal detection techniques. In this paper, we focus on the signal detection problem of MC receivers employing receptor molecules to infer the transmitted messages encoded into the concentration of molecules, i.e., ligands. Exploiting the observable characteristics of ligand-receptor binding reaction, we first introduce a Maximum Likelihood (ML) detection method based on instantaneous receptor occupation ratio, as aligned with the current MC literature. Then, we propose a novel ML detection technique, which exploits the amount of time the receptors stay unbound in an observation time window. A comprehensive analysis is carried out to compare the performance of the detectors in terms of bit error probability. In evaluating the detection performance, emphasis is given to the receptor saturation problem resulting from the accumulation of messenger molecules at the receiver as a consequence of intersymbol interference. The results reveal that detection based on receptor unbound time is quite reliable even in saturation, whereas the reliability of detection based on receptor occupation ratio substantially decreases as the receiver gets saturated. Finally, we also discuss the potential methods of implementing the detectors.

[1]  A. Vasilakos,et al.  Molecular Communication Among Biological Nanomachines: A Layered Architecture and Research Issues , 2014, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[2]  Y. Koucheryavy,et al.  The internet of Bio-Nano things , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  Tuna Tugcu,et al.  Three-Dimensional Channel Characteristics for Molecular Communications With an Absorbing Receiver , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.

[4]  A. Vasilakos,et al.  Molecular Communication and Networking: Opportunities and Challenges , 2012, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[5]  Peter Adam Hoeher,et al.  Equivalent Discrete-Time Channel Modeling for Molecular Communication With Emphasize on an Absorbing Receiver , 2017, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[6]  Mauro Femminella,et al.  A simple and scalable receiver model in molecular communication systems , 2016, NANOCOM.

[7]  Robert Schober,et al.  Comprehensive Reactive Receiver Modeling for Diffusive Molecular Communication Systems: Reversible Binding, Molecule Degradation, and Finite Number of Receptors , 2016, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[8]  Maryam Farahnak-Ghazani,et al.  On the Capacity of Point-to-Point and Multiple-Access Molecular Communications With Ligand-Receptors , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications.

[9]  W. Bialek,et al.  Physical limits to biochemical signaling. , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Özgür B. Akan,et al.  Receiver Design for Molecular Communication , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[11]  W. Bialek Biophysics: Searching for Principles , 2012 .

[12]  N. Wingreen,et al.  Maximum likelihood and the single receptor. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[13]  Murat Kuscu,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of SiNW FET-Based Molecular Communication Receiver , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[14]  L. Looger,et al.  Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions , 2003, Nature.

[15]  M. Lohse,et al.  Conformational changes in G‐protein‐coupled receptors—the quest for functionally selective conformations is open , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.

[16]  Timothy K Lu,et al.  Synthetic analog and digital circuits for cellular computation and memory. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[17]  P. R. ten Wolde,et al.  Fundamental Limits to Cellular Sensing , 2015, 1505.06577.

[18]  Rahul Sarpeshkar,et al.  Synthetic analog computation in living cells , 2013, Nature.

[19]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Monaco: fundamentals of molecular nano-communication networks , 2012, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[20]  Murat Kuscu,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of SiNW BioFET as molecular antenna for Bio-cyber interfaces towards the Internet of Bio-NanoThings , 2015, 2015 IEEE 2nd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT).

[21]  Pietro Liò,et al.  Applications of molecular communications to medicine: A survey , 2016, Nano Commun. Networks.

[22]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  On Receiver Design for Diffusion-Based Molecular Communication , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[23]  Timothy K. Lu,et al.  Synthetic mixed-signal computation in living cells , 2016, Nature Communications.

[24]  I. Nemenman,et al.  Effects of receptor correlations on molecular information transmission. , 2016, Physical review. E.

[25]  Murat Kuscu,et al.  Fundamentals of Molecular Information and Communication Science , 2017, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[26]  A. Berezhkovskii,et al.  Effect of ligand diffusion on occupancy fluctuations of cell-surface receptors. , 2013, The Journal of chemical physics.

[27]  F. Tostevin,et al.  The Berg-Purcell limit revisited. , 2014, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Genetically Engineered Bacteria-Based BioTransceivers for Molecular Communication , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[29]  Adam Noel,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Molecular Communication Systems With a Reversible Adsorption Receiver , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications.

[30]  E. Andrianantoandro,et al.  Synthetic biology: new engineering rules for an emerging discipline , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[31]  Massimiliano Pierobon,et al.  Noise Analysis in Ligand-Binding Reception for Molecular Communication in Nanonetworks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[32]  Robert Schober,et al.  Optimal Receiver Design for Diffusive Molecular Communication With Flow and Additive Noise , 2013, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[33]  H. Berg,et al.  Physics of chemoreception. , 1977, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Urbashi Mitra,et al.  Receivers for Diffusion-Based Molecular Communication: Exploiting Memory and Sampling Rate , 2014, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[35]  Massimiliano Pierobon,et al.  Capacity of a Diffusion-Based Molecular Communication System With Channel Memory and Molecular Noise , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[36]  Murat Kuscu,et al.  The Internet of Molecular Things Based on FRET , 2016, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[37]  Chun Tung Chou,et al.  Maximum A-Posteriori Decoding for Diffusion-Based Molecular Communication Using Analog Filters , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[38]  Murat Kuscu,et al.  On the Physical Design of Molecular Communication Receiver Based on Nanoscale Biosensors , 2015, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[39]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .