Highly identified power‐holders feel responsible: The interplay between social identification and social power within groups

Power relations affect dynamics within groups. Power-holders' decisions not only determine their personal outcomes, but also the outcomes of others in the group that they control. Yet, power-holders often tend to overlook this responsibility to take care of collective interests. The present research investigated how social identification - with the group to which both the powerful and the powerless belong - alters perceived responsibility among power-holders (and the powerless). Combining research on social power and social identity, we argue that power-holders perceive more responsibility than the powerless when strongly (rather than when weakly) identifying with the group. A study among leaders and an experiment supported this, highlighting that although power-holders are often primarily concerned about personal outcomes, they do feel responsible for considering others' interests when these others are included in the (social) self.

[1]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[2]  A. Guinote.  IN TOUCH WITH YOUR FEELINGS: POWER INCREASES RELIANCE ON BODILY INFORMATION , 2010 .

[3]  Ana Guinote,et al.  Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility , 2007 .

[4]  H. Valen,et al.  [Power and morality]. , 1976, Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning.

[5]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Whether power holders construe their power as responsibility or opportunity influences their tendency to take advice from others , 2017 .

[6]  K. Sassenberg,et al.  Showing engagement or not: The influence of social identification and group deadlines on individual control strategies , 2015 .

[7]  D. Kipnis,et al.  Does power corrupt? , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  A. Guinote,et al.  Does Power Magnify the Expression of Dispositions? , 2012, Psychological science.

[9]  N. Mead,et al.  The essential tension between leadership and power: when leaders sacrifice group goals for the sake of self-interest. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  S. Giessner,et al.  Team-oriented leadership: the interactive effects of leader group prototypicality, accountability, and team identification. , 2013, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  Michael Inzlicht,et al.  Power changes how the brain responds to others. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Joris Lammers,et al.  Power increases dehumanization , 2011 .

[13]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influence. , 2002, The British journal of social psychology.

[14]  James W. Pennebaker,et al.  Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2007) , 2007 .

[15]  Ana Guinote,et al.  Power and Goal Pursuit , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[16]  A. Aron,et al.  Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness , 1992 .

[17]  Ana Guinote,et al.  Power and affordances: when the situation has more power over powerful than powerless individuals. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  N. Ellemers,et al.  MOTIVATING INDIVIDUALS AND GROUPS AT WORK : A SOCIAL IDENTITY PERSPECTIVE ON LEADERSHIP AND GROUP PERFORMANCE , 2004 .

[19]  Tom Postmes,et al.  The Induction of Shared Identity: The Positive Role of Individual Distinctiveness for Groups , 2011, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[20]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Identity processes in organizations , 2011 .

[21]  K. Vohs,et al.  How leaders self-regulate their task performance: evidence that power promotes diligence, depletion, and disdain. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  T. Chartrand,et al.  From Moses to Marcos: Individual differences in the use and abuse of power. , 2001 .

[23]  Ana Guinote,et al.  Behaviour variability and the Situated Focus Theory of Power , 2007 .

[24]  M. Brewer.  In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[25]  J. Bargh,et al.  Attitudes and Social Cognition Relationship Orientation as a Moderator of the Effects of Social Power , 2022 .

[26]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[27]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Leadership and the Psychology of Power , 2004 .

[28]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Social Identity Theory , 2019, Social Psychology in Action.

[29]  Joe C. Magee,et al.  Acceleration With Steering , 2014 .

[30]  N. Ellemers.  The Group Self , 2012, Science.

[31]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[32]  Jolanda Jetten,et al.  Individuality and the Group: Advances in Social Identity , 2006 .

[33]  D. Keltner,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Power, Distress, and Compassion Turning a Blind Eye to the Suffering of Others , 2022 .

[34]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[35]  T. Kessler,et al.  Group-based emotions as determinants of ingroup identification ☆ , 2005 .

[36]  Margarete Boos,et al.  Attitude Change in Computer-Mediated Communication: Effects of Anonymity and Category Norms , 2003 .

[37]  R. Ashmore,et al.  An organizing framework for collective identity: articulation and significance of multidimensionality. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[38]  A. Hayes.  Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[39]  D. Cremer,et al.  Social identification effects in social dilemmas : a transformation of motives , 1999 .

[40]  Joe C. Magee,et al.  Power, Culture, and Action: Considerations in the Expression and Enactment of Power in East Asian and Western Societies , 2006 .

[41]  D. D. Hartog,et al.  Ethical and despotic leadership, relationships with leader's social responsibility, top management team effectiveness and subordinates' optimism: A multi-method study , 2008 .

[42]  Robert F. Kidd,et al.  Manipulation checks: Advantage or disadvantage? , 1976 .

[43]  R. Spears,et al.  De‐individuation and group polarization in computer‐mediated communication , 1990 .

[44]  Bernadette Park,et al.  Powerful perceivers, powerless objects: Flexibility of powerholders’ social attention☆ , 2006 .

[45]  Bernadette Park,et al.  When power does not corrupt: superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[46]  Sharon Shavitt,et al.  Culture and concepts of power. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[47]  K. Sassenberg,et al.  Where could we stand if I had…? How social power impacts counterfactual thinking after failure , 2014 .

[48]  D. Keltner,et al.  Power Gets You High , 2014 .

[49]  Katie A. Liljenquist,et al.  Power reduces the press of the situation: implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  Amie M. Gordon,et al.  Does Power Help or Hurt? The Moderating Role of Self–Other Focus on Power and Perspective-Taking in Romantic Relationships , 2013, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[51]  Joe C Magee,et al.  From power to action. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  M. Hogg.  Social Identity Theory , 2016 .

[53]  Kelly E. See,et al.  The detrimental effects of power on confidence, advice taking, and accuracy , 2011 .

[54]  Daan van Knippenberg,et al.  Work Motivation and Performance: A Social Identity Perspective , 2000 .

[55]  J. Maner,et al.  The Essential Tension Between Leadership and Power , 2013 .

[56]  Michael J. Platow,et al.  The New Psychology of Leadership: Identity, Influence and Power , 2010 .

[57]  T. Postmes,et al.  Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalization , 2002 .

[58]  K. Vohs,et al.  Are groups more or less than the sum of their members? The moderating role of individual identification , 2015, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[59]  U. Kühnen.  Manipulation Checks as Manipulation: Another Look at the Ease-of-Retrieval Heuristic , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[60]  Fred A. Mael,et al.  Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification , 1992 .

[61]  Annika Scholl,et al.  Better Know When (Not) to Think Twice , 2015, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[62]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  A matter of focus: Power‐holders feel more responsible after adopting a cognitive other‐focus, rather than a self‐focus , 2017, The British journal of social psychology.

[63]  T. Postmes,et al.  Behavior Online: Does Anonymous Computer Communication Reduce Gender Inequality? , 2002 .

[64]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  The attraction of social power: The influence of construing power as opportunity versus responsibility , 2012 .

[65]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[66]  Michael W. Kraus,et al.  Social power facilitates the effect of prosocial orientation on empathic accuracy. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[67]  Johan C. Karremans,et al.  Having the Power to Forgive: When the Experience of Power Increases Interpersonal Forgiveness , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[68]  C. Judd,et al.  Less power = less human? Effects of power differentials on dehumanization , 2013 .

[69]  N. Ellemers,et al.  If we have the will, there will be a way: regulatory focus as a group identity , 2008 .

[70]  Michael W. Kraus,et al.  The power to be me: Power elevates self-concept consistency and authenticity , 2011 .

[71]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[72]  K. Sassenberg,et al.  Power in group contexts: the influence of group status on promotion and prevention decision making. , 2013, The British journal of social psychology.

[73]  K. Sassenberg,et al.  Power, Politics, and Paranoia: “Power corrupts” revisited: the role of construal of power as opportunity or responsibility , 2014 .

[74]  Ana Guinote,et al.  When subjective experiences matter: power increases reliance on the ease of retrieval. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[75]  D. S. Derue,et al.  Does power corrupt or enable? When and why power facilitates self-interested behavior. , 2012, The Journal of applied psychology.

[76]  E. Jonas,et al.  The role of control motivation in mortality salience effects on ingroup support and defense. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.