A formal approach to organization of educational objectives

The organization of educational objectives plays an important role in curriculum development process, since it enables the sequencing of educational experiences. The main goal of this paper is to propose a framework for the formal representation of educational objectives, which enables the evaluation of organization of educational objectives. The model is based on domain ontology, Bloom's taxonomy and objectives organization in the competence-based knowledge space. The model is verified on the case study that evaluates the students' achievements in Chemistry field Solutions by conducting an informal knowledge test on the group of 199 14-year-old students of primary schools in the Republic of Serbia. The results obtained from the case study clearly indicate the necessity for including assessment of students' achievements in the organization of educational objectives. The proposed model enables evaluation of organization of educational objectives which could be further used for an iterative refinement of the organization of educational objectives.

[1]  B. Bloom Taxonomy of educational objectives , 1956 .

[2]  Zoltán Tóth Mapping students’ knowledge structure in understanding density, mass percent, molar mass, molar volume and their application in calculations by the use of the knowledge space theory , 2007 .

[3]  G. Savic,et al.  Optimal counterexamples expectation based method for knowledge space construction , 2010, IEEE 8th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics.

[4]  Mathieu Koppen,et al.  Extracting human expertise for constructing knowledge spaces: an algorithm , 1993 .

[5]  Mark Langdon SECURING A FUTURE , 2002 .

[6]  Ronald W. Tyrrell An Appraisal of the Tyler Rationale , 1974, The School Review.

[7]  Dietrich Albert,et al.  Component-based Knowledge Spaces in Problem Solving and Inductive Reasoning , 2009 .

[8]  Dietrich Albert,et al.  Competence-based knowledge structures for personalised learning: distributed resources and virtual experiments , 2005 .

[9]  Dietrich Albert,et al.  Activity- and taxonomy-based knowledge representation framework , 2008, Int. J. Knowl. Learn..

[10]  Ali Ünlü,et al.  Inductive item tree analysis: Corrections, improvements, and comparisons , 2009, Math. Soc. Sci..

[11]  Peter S. Hlebowitsh Designing the school curriculum , 2004 .

[12]  Dietrich Albert,et al.  Personalising Learning through Prerequisite Structures Derived from Concept Maps , 2007, ICWL.

[13]  Kieran Egan What Is Curriculum , 1978 .

[14]  Roberto Pirrone,et al.  Learning Path Generation by Domain Ontology Transformation , 2005, AI*IA.

[15]  E. Simpson THE CLASSIFICATION OF EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES, PSYCHOMOTOR DOMAIN. , 1966 .

[16]  Zora Konjovic,et al.  Knowledge Representation Framework for Curriculum Development , 2010, KEOD.

[17]  Martin Bush Quality assurance of multiple‐choice tests , 2006 .

[18]  Jean-Paul Doignon,et al.  A Markovian procedure for assessing the state of a system , 1988 .

[19]  Dietrich Albert,et al.  Component-based Construction of Surmise Relations for Chess Problems , 1999 .

[20]  Jean-Paul Doignon Knowledge Spaces and Skill Assignments , 1994 .

[21]  Jean-Claude Falmagne,et al.  Learning Spaces: Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics , 2010 .

[22]  Cosyn,et al.  A Practical Procedure to Build a Knowledge Structure. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[23]  Rick R. McCown,et al.  Educational Psychology: A Learning Centered Approach to Classroom Practice , 1995 .

[24]  Herbert M. Kliebard,et al.  The Tyler Rationale , 1970, The School Review.

[25]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[26]  D. Albert,et al.  Establishing knowledge spaces by systematical problem construction , 1994 .

[27]  David F. Treagust,et al.  SECURING A FUTURE FOR CHEMICAL EDUCATION , 2004 .

[28]  Andrea Tontini On the Limits of Chemical Knowledge , 2004 .

[29]  Ivo Düntsch,et al.  Skills and knowledge structures , 1995 .

[30]  E. Furst Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives for the Cognitive Domain: Philosophical and Educational Issues , 1981 .

[31]  Ralph W. Tyler,et al.  Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction , 1969 .

[32]  Jay McTighe,et al.  Understanding by Design, Expanded 2nd Edition , 2005 .

[33]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Model Driven Engineering and Ontology Development , 2009 .

[34]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[35]  Mathieu Koppen,et al.  Introduction to knowledge spaces: How to build, test, and search them , 1990 .