Out of the Laboratory: A Case Study with the IRUS Natural Language Interface

As part of DARPA's Strategic Computing Program, we have moved a large natural language system out of the laboratory. This involved:• Delivery of knowledge acquisition software to the Naval Ocean Systems Center (NOSC) to build linguistic knowledge bases, such as dictionary entries and case frames,• Demonstration of the natural language interface in a naval decision-making setting, and• Delivery of the interface software to Texas Instruments, which has integrated it into the total software package of the Strategic Computing Fleet Command Center Battle Management Program (FCCBMP).The resulting natural language interface will be delivered to the Pacific Fleet Command Center in Hawaii.This paper is an overview of this effort in technology transfer, indicating the technology features that have made this possible and reflecting upon what the experience illustrates regarding transportability, technology status, and delivery of natural language processing outside of a laboratory setting. The paper will be most valuable to those engaged in applying state-of-the-art techniques to deliver natural language interfaces and to those interested in developing the next generation of complete natural language interfaces.

[1]  E. Lesch Bridge the gap. , 1984, Journal of nephrology nursing.

[2]  James D. Benson,et al.  Selected theoretical papers from the 9th International Systemic Workshop , 1985 .

[3]  Norman K. Sondheimer,et al.  Meta-Rules as a Basis for Processing III-Formed Input , 1983, Am. J. Comput. Linguistics.

[4]  David Stallard,et al.  The IRUS Transportable Natural Language Database Interface , 1984, Expert Database Workshop.

[5]  Fred J. Damerau,et al.  Operating Statistics for the Transformational Question Answering System , 1981, CL.

[6]  David J. Israel,et al.  Research in Knowledge Representation for Natural Language Understanding , 1980 .

[7]  T. Kaczmarek,et al.  The Consul/CUE interface: An integrated interactive environment , 1983, CHI '83.

[8]  Douglas E. Appelt,et al.  TEAM: An Experiment in the Design of Transportable Natural-Language Interfaces , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[9]  J. Meigs,et al.  WHO Technical Report , 1954, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[10]  Yorick Wilks,et al.  Preference Semantics, III-Formedness, and Metaphor , 1983, Am. J. Comput. Linguistics.

[11]  Alan W. Biermann Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics , 1986 .

[12]  N. S. Sridharan,et al.  Semi-Applicative Programming. Examples of Context Free Recognizers. , 1986 .

[13]  R. Scha Logical foundations for question answering , 1983 .

[14]  William C. Mann,et al.  Nigel: A Systemic Grammar for Text Generation. , 1983 .

[15]  James G. Schmolze,et al.  Classification in the KL-ONE Knowledge Representation System , 1983, IJCAI.

[16]  Larry Kerschberg,et al.  Expert Database Systems , 1987 .

[17]  David Stallard,et al.  A Terminological Simplification Transformation for Natural Language Question-Answering Systems , 1986, HLT.

[18]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Natural-Language Processing , 1982, Artificial Intelligence.

[19]  B. H. Thompson,et al.  Linguistic Analysis of Natural Language Communication With Computers , 1980, COLING.

[20]  Robert C. Moore Natural-Language Access to Databases-Theoretical/Technical Issues , 1982, ACL.

[21]  Alan Bundy,et al.  Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 1983 .

[22]  H. William Buttelmann,et al.  American Journal of Computational Linguistics , 1974 .

[23]  William A. Woods,et al.  Computational Linguistics Transition Network Grammars for Natural Language Analysis , 2022 .

[24]  Remko J. H. Scha English Words and Data Bases: How to Bridge the Gap , 1982, ACL.