Methodologies for a dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of the fast cascade occurring in cascading failures leading to blackouts

Blackouts result from cascading failure in transmission power systems. The typical development of a cascading failure can be split in two phases. In an initial slow cascade phase, an initiating contingency triggers a thermal transient developing on characteristic times much larger than the electrical time constants. This transient increases significantly the likelihood of additional contingencies. The loss of additional elements can then trigger an electrical instability. This is the origin of a subsequent fast cascade, where a rapid succession of events can lead the system to blackout. Based on these two phases and because cascading mechanisms occurring in each phase are very different, the blackout Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) can be decomposed in two levels. A methodology for the level-I (PRA of the slow cascade) was already developed. Level-II analysis is the assessment of the fast cascade. It starts when the transmission power system becomes electrically unstable and finishes when the system reaches an electrically stable state (blackout state or operational state with load shedding). The aim of this paper is to discuss possible adequate methodologies for the level-II and to apply one of them to a test system.

[1]  Anne Kuefer,et al.  Voltage Stability Of Electric Power Systems , 2016 .

[2]  Pierre-Etienne Labeau,et al.  Modeling PSA Problems—I: The Stimulus-Driven Theory of Probabilistic Dynamics , 2005 .

[3]  Pierre-Etienne Labeau,et al.  Two-level blackout probabilistic risk analysis: application to a test system , 2013 .

[4]  Carol-Sophie Smidts,et al.  Probabilistic dynamics as a tool for dynamic PSA , 1996 .

[5]  P. Kundur,et al.  Power system stability and control , 1994 .

[6]  Pierre-Etienne Labeau,et al.  A level-1 probabilistic risk assessment to blackout hazard in transmission power systems , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  Pierre-Etienne Labeau,et al.  Transmission Grid Security: A PSA Approach , 2011 .

[8]  M. Kloos,et al.  MCDET: A Probabilistic Dynamics Method Combining Monte Carlo Simulation with the Discrete Dynamic Event Tree Approach , 2006 .

[9]  Paul M. Anderson Power System Protection , 1998 .

[10]  Pierre-Etienne Labeau,et al.  Dynamic reliability: towards an integrated platform for probabilistic risk assessment , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Éric Zamaï,et al.  Blackouts: Description, Analysis and Classification , 2006 .

[12]  Pierre-Etienne Labeau,et al.  Dynamic probabilistic risk analysis of the fast cascade phase of large disturbances in power system , 2012 .

[13]  Liisa Haarla,et al.  COMPUTING DYNAMIC INSTABILITY OF A POWER SYSTEM AFTER RELAY FAILURES , 2011 .

[14]  M. Cheok,et al.  Use of importance measures in risk-informed regulatory applications , 1998 .

[15]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .