Analysis of Biological Apatite Crystal Orientation in Anterior Cortical Bone of Human Mandible Using Microbeam X-ray Diffractometry

The human jaw is a unique bone that facilitates mastication. The structural properties of the jaw are determined by mechanical stresses transmitted via the teeth. However, it is very difficult to evaluate the impact of these mechanical stresses on bone. In recent years, it has become clear that the orientation of biological apatite (BAp) crystals is closely related to local stress, and is thought to respond more acutely to local stress than bone mineral density (BMD). Few studies have been conducted on BAp crystal alignment in response to mechanical stress in the human jaw, which has a complex masticatory function. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate BMD and BAp crystal orientation using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and microbeam X-ray diffractometry in the anterior cortical bone of human mandible. The intensity and direction of mechanical stresses in both the alveolar area and mandibular base were compared. The mandibular central incisor region in Japanese bone samples was designated as the region of interest and BMD and BAp crystal orientation in the alveolar area and mandibular base measured. Bone samples were imaged by micro-CT and the data obtained converted into BMD values. BAp crystal orientation was determined by both reflection- and transmission-based microbeam X-ray diffractometry. The diffraction intensity ratio was calculated using X-ray diffraction peaks of (002) and (310). The results showed no difference in BMD values among regions. BAp crystals were oriented predominantly in the mesiodistal direction in the mandibular base and along the direction of masticatory force in the alveolar area. These findings suggest that the mandibular base exhibits long bone-like characteristics, with the mandibular condyle acting as the head of the bone, while in the alveolar area alignment takes place in the direction of masticatory force resulting from mechanical stress exerted via the teeth. Qualitative evaluation revealed clear differences between the mandibular base and alveolar area, suggesting that BAp crystal orientation offers a more precise indicator of bone quality than BMD. [doi:10.2320/matertrans.M2011329]

[1]  Chi-Ming Lee,et al.  Morphologic and bony structural changes in the mandible after a unilateral injection of botulinum neurotoxin in adult rats. , 2010, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[2]  T. Nakano,et al.  Analysis of Biological Apatite Orientation in Rat Mandibles , 2010 .

[3]  Y. Shibata,et al.  Mineralization Potential of Polarized Dental Enamel , 2009, PloS one.

[4]  T. Ishimoto,et al.  Adaptation of BAp crystal orientation to stress distribution in rat mandible during bone growth , 2009 .

[5]  T. Nakano,et al.  New Technique for Evaluation of Preferential Alignment of Biological Apatite (BAp) Crystallites in Bone Using Transmission X-ray Diffractometry , 2008 .

[6]  Jacques P. Brown,et al.  Histomorphometric and Densitometric Changes in the Femora of Spinal Cord Transected Mice , 2008, Anatomical record.

[7]  I. Ichim,et al.  Functional significance of strain distribution in the human mandible under masticatory load: numerical predictions. , 2007, Archives of oral biology.

[8]  Y. Tabata,et al.  Areal distribution of preferential alignment of biological apatite (BAp) crystallite on cross-section of center of femoral diaphysis in osteopetrotic (op/op) mouse , 2007 .

[9]  T. Adachi,et al.  Two-Dimensional Quantitative Analysis of Preferential Alignment of BAp c-axis for Isolated Human Trabecular Bone Using Microbeam X-ray Diffractometer with a Transmission Optical System , 2007 .

[10]  Y. Tabata,et al.  Role of Stress Distribution on Healing Process of Preferential Alignment of Biological Apatite in Long Bones , 2006 .

[11]  Y. Tabata,et al.  Unique alignment and texture of biological apatite crystallites in typical calcified tissues analyzed by microbeam X-ray diffractometer system. , 2002, Bone.

[12]  M. Ito,et al.  Analysis of trabecular microarchitecture of human iliac bone using microcomputed tomography in patients with hip arthrosis with or without vertebral fracture. , 1998, Bone.

[13]  C. Mautalen,et al.  Bone Mineral Density and Bone Size in Men With Primary Osteoporosis and Vertebral Fractures , 1998, Calcified Tissue International.

[14]  Y. Ide,et al.  A morphological change of mandible and maxilla after loss of teeth , 1997 .

[15]  H. Kröger,et al.  Muscle strength and mineral densities in the mandible. , 1994, Gerodontology.

[16]  H. Frost Bone “mass” and the “mechanostat”: A proposal , 1987, The Anatomical record.

[17]  D. J. Wolff Ueber die innere Architectur der Knochen und ihre Bedeutung für die Frage vom Knochenwachsthum , 1870, Archiv für pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für klinische Medicin.

[18]  Kay Dickersin,et al.  Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. , 2000, NIH consensus statement.

[19]  G. Daculsi,et al.  Adaptive crystal formation in normal and pathological calcifications in synthetic calcium phosphate and related biomaterials. , 1997, International review of cytology.

[20]  J. Elliott,et al.  Structure and chemistry of the apatites and other calcium orthophosphates , 1994 .

[21]  N. Sasaki,et al.  Orientation of bone mineral and its role in the anisotropic mechanical properties of bone--transverse anisotropy. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[22]  R. Griffiths,et al.  Orientation of apatite crystals in relation to muscle attachment in the mandible. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.